Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics
Taiwan and Estonia are known as digital democracies facing threats from neighbors exploiting the vulnerabilities stemming from their degree of digitalization. Nevertheless, in their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan and Estonia have highlighted the strengths of digital democracy in combatin...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Social Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/112 |
| _version_ | 1797442125775765504 |
|---|---|
| author | Andrey Makarychev Elizabeth Wishnick |
| author_facet | Andrey Makarychev Elizabeth Wishnick |
| author_sort | Andrey Makarychev |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Taiwan and Estonia are known as digital democracies facing threats from neighbors exploiting the vulnerabilities stemming from their degree of digitalization. Nevertheless, in their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan and Estonia have highlighted the strengths of digital democracy in combating a non-traditional security threat without employing the strong-arm tactics of authoritarian states. The goal of the article is to distinguish between vulnerability in cyberspace and digital power and put forward a conception of digital power to explain how Estonia and Taiwan were using their digital prowess to combat COVID-19. We argue that on one hand, their reliance on cybertechnology makes them particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks, but on the other their digital power enhances their global stature and domestic capacity to address threats such as COVID-19. The article starts by engaging with the ongoing academic debate on the concept of digital power and its political core. In the next section we adapt this concept to the policy practices of digital governance in Estonia and Taiwan. Lastly, we look more specifically at how investments in the IT sphere and e-governance were helpful for the two countries during the initial stage of the COVID-19 crisis. In conclusion, we highlight the paradox of two democracies choosing to extend the reach of the state into society through the use of digital tools to combat COVID-19. We further note that the pandemic provides a new biopolitical understanding of vulnerability and power in the digital realm. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:37:17Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d048f93e62bc4e8eb3cfd5cbe1b3d32a |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-0760 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:37:17Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Social Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-d048f93e62bc4e8eb3cfd5cbe1b3d32a2023-11-30T22:22:40ZengMDPI AGSocial Sciences2076-07602022-03-0111311210.3390/socsci11030112Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and BiopoliticsAndrey Makarychev0Elizabeth Wishnick1Johan Skytte Institute of Political Studies, University of Tartu, Lossi 36, 51003 Tartu, EstoniaDepartment of Political Science and Law, Montclair State University, 1 Normal Avenue, Montclair, NJ 07043, USATaiwan and Estonia are known as digital democracies facing threats from neighbors exploiting the vulnerabilities stemming from their degree of digitalization. Nevertheless, in their responses to the COVID-19 pandemic, Taiwan and Estonia have highlighted the strengths of digital democracy in combating a non-traditional security threat without employing the strong-arm tactics of authoritarian states. The goal of the article is to distinguish between vulnerability in cyberspace and digital power and put forward a conception of digital power to explain how Estonia and Taiwan were using their digital prowess to combat COVID-19. We argue that on one hand, their reliance on cybertechnology makes them particularly vulnerable to cyberattacks, but on the other their digital power enhances their global stature and domestic capacity to address threats such as COVID-19. The article starts by engaging with the ongoing academic debate on the concept of digital power and its political core. In the next section we adapt this concept to the policy practices of digital governance in Estonia and Taiwan. Lastly, we look more specifically at how investments in the IT sphere and e-governance were helpful for the two countries during the initial stage of the COVID-19 crisis. In conclusion, we highlight the paradox of two democracies choosing to extend the reach of the state into society through the use of digital tools to combat COVID-19. We further note that the pandemic provides a new biopolitical understanding of vulnerability and power in the digital realm.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/112digitalcyberCOVID-19biopowerpandemicgovernmentality |
| spellingShingle | Andrey Makarychev Elizabeth Wishnick Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics Social Sciences digital cyber COVID-19 biopower pandemic governmentality |
| title | Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics |
| title_full | Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics |
| title_fullStr | Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics |
| title_full_unstemmed | Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics |
| title_short | Anti-Pandemic Policies in Estonia and Taiwan: Digital Power, Sovereignty and Biopolitics |
| title_sort | anti pandemic policies in estonia and taiwan digital power sovereignty and biopolitics |
| topic | digital cyber COVID-19 biopower pandemic governmentality |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/11/3/112 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT andreymakarychev antipandemicpoliciesinestoniaandtaiwandigitalpowersovereigntyandbiopolitics AT elizabethwishnick antipandemicpoliciesinestoniaandtaiwandigitalpowersovereigntyandbiopolitics |