Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments
In this article, we aim to analyse whether a systematic meth- od for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be ap- plied to a novel legal domain, name- ly European asylum law. This analy- sis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of t...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Windsor
2016-09-01
|
| Series: | Informal Logic |
| Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4723 |
| _version_ | 1818514370681896960 |
|---|---|
| author | F.J. Bex V.M. Bex-Reimert |
| author_facet | F.J. Bex V.M. Bex-Reimert |
| author_sort | F.J. Bex |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | In this article, we aim to analyse whether a systematic meth- od for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be ap- plied to a novel legal domain, name- ly European asylum law. This analy- sis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:14:49Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d05c05abcf714aaa945127f32073fb92 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0824-2577 0824-2577 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-11T00:14:49Z |
| publishDate | 2016-09-01 |
| publisher | University of Windsor |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Informal Logic |
| spelling | doaj.art-d05c05abcf714aaa945127f32073fb922022-12-22T01:28:01ZengUniversity of WindsorInformal Logic0824-25770824-25772016-09-0136334937010.22329/il.v36i3.47233679Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and ArgumentsF.J. BexV.M. Bex-ReimertIn this article, we aim to analyse whether a systematic meth- od for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be ap- plied to a novel legal domain, name- ly European asylum law. This analy- sis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of the hybrid theory outside of the context of criminal law. Furthermore, the analysis will provide insights on how the hybrid theory can be used to improve the normative framework for evidence assessment in asylum cases.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4723 |
| spellingShingle | F.J. Bex V.M. Bex-Reimert Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments Informal Logic |
| title | Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments |
| title_full | Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments |
| title_fullStr | Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments |
| title_short | Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments |
| title_sort | evidence assessment in refugee law with stories and arguments |
| url | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4723 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fjbex evidenceassessmentinrefugeelawwithstoriesandarguments AT vmbexreimert evidenceassessmentinrefugeelawwithstoriesandarguments |