Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments
In this article, we aim to analyse whether a systematic meth- od for reasoning with evidence in legal cases – the hybrid theory of stories and arguments – can be ap- plied to a novel legal domain, name- ly European asylum law. This analy- sis serves as a case study for testing the applicability of t...
Main Authors: | F.J. Bex, V.M. Bex-Reimert |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Windsor
2016-09-01
|
Series: | Informal Logic |
Online Access: | https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/ojs/leddy/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/4723 |
Similar Items
-
Evidence Assessment in Refugee Law with Stories and Arguments
by: F.J. Bex, et al.
Published: (2016-09-01) -
Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue
by: Floris Bex, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
Special issue: Computational models of natural argument
by: Floriana Grasso, et al.
Published: (2016-07-01) -
RationalGRL: A framework for argumentation and goal modeling
by: Marc van Zee, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01) -
Deductive and abductive argumentation based on information graphs
by: Remi Wieten, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01)