Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions

In exploring psychology’s relationship with spirituality and religion, I argue that natural-science psychologists have tended to repress their discipline’s spiritual and religious heritage. History of psychology textbooks sharply distinguish “objective” psychology from “subjective” philosophy, theol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard Walsh-Bowers
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Windsor 2019-04-01
Series:Critical Social Work
Online Access:https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5779
_version_ 1819040997382815744
author Richard Walsh-Bowers
author_facet Richard Walsh-Bowers
author_sort Richard Walsh-Bowers
collection DOAJ
description In exploring psychology’s relationship with spirituality and religion, I argue that natural-science psychologists have tended to repress their discipline’s spiritual and religious heritage. History of psychology textbooks sharply distinguish “objective” psychology from “subjective” philosophy, theology, religion, and spirituality, while glossing over historical anomalies such as natural-science psychologists’ ambivalent stance regarding psychoanalysis. Psychologists’ scientism (“worship” of the experimental model, technology, scientific progress, and materialist conceptions of the soul) militates against resolving persistent, disciplinary tensions between objectivity and subjectivity. Rather than emulating psychology, social workers should turn to their own traditions and develop a human-science orientation for their profession. When theorizing, they could connect empowerment and the ecological metaphor with these concepts’ spiritual base. When researching, social workers could foster more active roles for their participants and could write their research articles in more personalized, inter-subjective, and contextualized ways. When educating, they could incorporate critical education in process and content.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T09:17:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d064ee2b339d4d67bd49f78dc409561a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1543-9372
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T09:17:59Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher University of Windsor
record_format Article
series Critical Social Work
spelling doaj.art-d064ee2b339d4d67bd49f78dc409561a2022-12-21T19:09:07ZengUniversity of WindsorCritical Social Work1543-93722019-04-017110.22329/csw.v7i1.5779Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious TraditionsRichard Walsh-Bowers0Professor of Psychology, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, CanadaIn exploring psychology’s relationship with spirituality and religion, I argue that natural-science psychologists have tended to repress their discipline’s spiritual and religious heritage. History of psychology textbooks sharply distinguish “objective” psychology from “subjective” philosophy, theology, religion, and spirituality, while glossing over historical anomalies such as natural-science psychologists’ ambivalent stance regarding psychoanalysis. Psychologists’ scientism (“worship” of the experimental model, technology, scientific progress, and materialist conceptions of the soul) militates against resolving persistent, disciplinary tensions between objectivity and subjectivity. Rather than emulating psychology, social workers should turn to their own traditions and develop a human-science orientation for their profession. When theorizing, they could connect empowerment and the ecological metaphor with these concepts’ spiritual base. When researching, social workers could foster more active roles for their participants and could write their research articles in more personalized, inter-subjective, and contextualized ways. When educating, they could incorporate critical education in process and content.https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5779
spellingShingle Richard Walsh-Bowers
Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
Critical Social Work
title Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
title_full Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
title_fullStr Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
title_full_unstemmed Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
title_short Psychology’s Potential for Reconciliation with Spiritual and Religious Traditions
title_sort psychology s potential for reconciliation with spiritual and religious traditions
url https://ojs.uwindsor.ca/index.php/csw/article/view/5779
work_keys_str_mv AT richardwalshbowers psychologyspotentialforreconciliationwithspiritualandreligioustraditions