Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression

Aeroelastic modelling and stability analysis of wing with morphing trailing edge have attracted more and more attention. In order to explore the methods and characteristics between active flutter suppression of wings with morphing trailing edge and conventional control surface, a small aspect ratio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: YANG Yongjian, SONG Chen, ZHANG Zhenkai, YANG Chao
Format: Article
Language:zho
Published: Editorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering 2023-06-01
Series:Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2022149?st=article_issue
_version_ 1797682356434239488
author YANG Yongjian
SONG Chen
ZHANG Zhenkai
YANG Chao
author_facet YANG Yongjian
SONG Chen
ZHANG Zhenkai
YANG Chao
author_sort YANG Yongjian
collection DOAJ
description Aeroelastic modelling and stability analysis of wing with morphing trailing edge have attracted more and more attention. In order to explore the methods and characteristics between active flutter suppression of wings with morphing trailing edge and conventional control surface, a small aspect ratio wing with morphing trailing edge is taken as the object to research. Firstly, a structural finite element model is established, and the deformation modes of morphing trailing edge and conventional control surface are introduced to calculate the unsteady aerodynamic forc-es by employing subsonic doublet lattice method. Then, the rational function fitting based on minimum-state method is used to transform the frequency-domain model to time-domain model, and the aeroelastic models of two configuration wings are established. Finally, a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) method is used to design the con-trol law to perform the active flutter suppression, and the property difference of two control modes are analyzed.The results show that the wing with morphing trailing edge can increase the critical speed of flutter by 22%, the control effect is better than conventional control surface, and the required defection angle is smaller.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T23:58:29Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d06f19ecf8f041f6beaeaed5b72f23b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1674-8190
language zho
last_indexed 2024-03-11T23:58:29Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Editorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
record_format Article
series Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan
spelling doaj.art-d06f19ecf8f041f6beaeaed5b72f23b92023-09-18T06:59:06ZzhoEditorial Department of Advances in Aeronautical Science and EngineeringHangkong gongcheng jinzhan1674-81902023-06-011434149,6010.16615/j.cnki.1674-8190.2023.03.0420230304Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppressionYANG Yongjian0SONG Chen1ZHANG Zhenkai2YANG Chao3School of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaSchool of Aeronautic Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, ChinaAeroelastic modelling and stability analysis of wing with morphing trailing edge have attracted more and more attention. In order to explore the methods and characteristics between active flutter suppression of wings with morphing trailing edge and conventional control surface, a small aspect ratio wing with morphing trailing edge is taken as the object to research. Firstly, a structural finite element model is established, and the deformation modes of morphing trailing edge and conventional control surface are introduced to calculate the unsteady aerodynamic forc-es by employing subsonic doublet lattice method. Then, the rational function fitting based on minimum-state method is used to transform the frequency-domain model to time-domain model, and the aeroelastic models of two configuration wings are established. Finally, a linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) method is used to design the con-trol law to perform the active flutter suppression, and the property difference of two control modes are analyzed.The results show that the wing with morphing trailing edge can increase the critical speed of flutter by 22%, the control effect is better than conventional control surface, and the required defection angle is smaller.http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2022149?st=article_issuemorphing trailing edgesconventional control surfacesaeroelasticityactive flutter suppressionlinear quadratic gaussian method
spellingShingle YANG Yongjian
SONG Chen
ZHANG Zhenkai
YANG Chao
Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
Hangkong gongcheng jinzhan
morphing trailing edges
conventional control surfaces
aeroelasticity
active flutter suppression
linear quadratic gaussian method
title Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
title_full Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
title_fullStr Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
title_short Comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
title_sort comparison of morphing trailing edges and conventional control surfaces for active flutter suppression
topic morphing trailing edges
conventional control surfaces
aeroelasticity
active flutter suppression
linear quadratic gaussian method
url http://hkgcjz.cnjournals.com/hkgcjz/article/abstract/2022149?st=article_issue
work_keys_str_mv AT yangyongjian comparisonofmorphingtrailingedgesandconventionalcontrolsurfacesforactivefluttersuppression
AT songchen comparisonofmorphingtrailingedgesandconventionalcontrolsurfacesforactivefluttersuppression
AT zhangzhenkai comparisonofmorphingtrailingedgesandconventionalcontrolsurfacesforactivefluttersuppression
AT yangchao comparisonofmorphingtrailingedgesandconventionalcontrolsurfacesforactivefluttersuppression