Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Abstract Background The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 1...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mitsuyoshi Tei, Yozo Suzuki, Toshinori Sueda, Kazuya Iwamoto, Atsushi Naito, Masatoshi Nomura, Yukihiro Yoshikawa, Masahisa Ohtsuka, Mitsunobu Imasato, Tsunekazu Mizushima, Hiroki Akamatsu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-12-01
Series:BMC Gastroenterology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02597-z
_version_ 1811302216591474688
author Mitsuyoshi Tei
Yozo Suzuki
Toshinori Sueda
Kazuya Iwamoto
Atsushi Naito
Masatoshi Nomura
Yukihiro Yoshikawa
Masahisa Ohtsuka
Mitsunobu Imasato
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hiroki Akamatsu
author_facet Mitsuyoshi Tei
Yozo Suzuki
Toshinori Sueda
Kazuya Iwamoto
Atsushi Naito
Masatoshi Nomura
Yukihiro Yoshikawa
Masahisa Ohtsuka
Mitsunobu Imasato
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hiroki Akamatsu
author_sort Mitsuyoshi Tei
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I–III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis. Results After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n = 44 in each group). SILS was successful in 97.7% of the matched cohort. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes. Morbidity rates were similar between groups. Recurrence pattern did not differ between groups. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survivals. Conclusion SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for patients with DCC.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T07:24:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d073519df7b3471caa206c57e6b228e0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-230X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T07:24:06Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Gastroenterology
spelling doaj.art-d073519df7b3471caa206c57e6b228e02022-12-22T02:56:33ZengBMCBMC Gastroenterology1471-230X2022-12-012211910.1186/s12876-022-02597-zComparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysisMitsuyoshi Tei0Yozo Suzuki1Toshinori Sueda2Kazuya Iwamoto3Atsushi Naito4Masatoshi Nomura5Yukihiro Yoshikawa6Masahisa Ohtsuka7Mitsunobu Imasato8Tsunekazu Mizushima9Hiroki Akamatsu10Department of Surgery, Osaka Rosai HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Rosai HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Police HospitalDepartment of Surgery, Osaka Minato Central HospitalAbstract Background The clinical impact of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for descending colon cancer (DCC) is unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of SILS for DCC compared with multi-port laparoscopic surgery (MPLS). Methods We retrospectively analyzed 137 consecutive patients with stage I–III DCC who underwent SILS or MPLS at two high-volume multidisciplinary tertiary hospitals between April 2008 and December 2018, using propensity score-matched analysis. Results After propensity score-matching, we enrolled 88 patients (n = 44 in each group). SILS was successful in 97.7% of the matched cohort. Compared with the MPLS group, the SILS group showed significantly less blood loss and a greater number of harvested lymph nodes. Morbidity rates were similar between groups. Recurrence pattern did not differ between groups. No significant differences were found between groups in terms of 3-year disease-free and overall survivals. Conclusion SILS appears safe and feasible and can provide satisfactory oncological outcomes for patients with DCC.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02597-zSingle-incision laparoscopic surgeryDescending cancerOutcome
spellingShingle Mitsuyoshi Tei
Yozo Suzuki
Toshinori Sueda
Kazuya Iwamoto
Atsushi Naito
Masatoshi Nomura
Yukihiro Yoshikawa
Masahisa Ohtsuka
Mitsunobu Imasato
Tsunekazu Mizushima
Hiroki Akamatsu
Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
BMC Gastroenterology
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery
Descending cancer
Outcome
title Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_short Comparison of clinical outcomes of single-incision versus multi-port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
title_sort comparison of clinical outcomes of single incision versus multi port laparoscopic surgery for descending colon cancer a propensity score matched analysis
topic Single-incision laparoscopic surgery
Descending cancer
Outcome
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-022-02597-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mitsuyoshitei comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yozosuzuki comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT toshinorisueda comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT kazuyaiwamoto comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT atsushinaito comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT masatoshinomura comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT yukihiroyoshikawa comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT masahisaohtsuka comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT mitsunobuimasato comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT tsunekazumizushima comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis
AT hirokiakamatsu comparisonofclinicaloutcomesofsingleincisionversusmultiportlaparoscopicsurgeryfordescendingcoloncancerapropensityscorematchedanalysis