Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects
Rockfalls evolve rapidly and unpredictably in mountain environments and can cause considerable losses to human societies, structures, economical activities, and also natural and historical heritage. Rockfall risk analyses are complex and multi-scale processes involving several disciplines and techni...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Geosciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/3/98 |
_version_ | 1830509838317125632 |
---|---|
author | Claudio Scavia Monica Barbero Marta Castelli Maddalena Marchelli Daniele Peila Giulia Torsello Gianmarco Vallero |
author_facet | Claudio Scavia Monica Barbero Marta Castelli Maddalena Marchelli Daniele Peila Giulia Torsello Gianmarco Vallero |
author_sort | Claudio Scavia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Rockfalls evolve rapidly and unpredictably in mountain environments and can cause considerable losses to human societies, structures, economical activities, and also natural and historical heritage. Rockfall risk analyses are complex and multi-scale processes involving several disciplines and techniques. This complexity is due to the main features of rockfall phenomena, which are extremely variable over space and time. Today, a considerable number of methods exists for protecting land, as well as assessing and managing the risk level. These methodologies are often very different from each other, depending on the data required, the purposes of the analysis, and the reference scale adopted, i.e., the analysis level of detail. Nevertheless, several questions still remain open with reference to each phase of the hazard and risk process. This paper is devoted to a general overview of existing risk estimation methodologies and a critical analysis of some open questions with the aim of highlighting possible further research topics. A typical risk assessment framework is exemplified by analyzing a real case study. Each step of the process is treated at both the detailed and the large scale in order to highlight the main characteristics of each level of detail. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-22T01:41:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d08057b1fc82403a9603d772e3cd0493 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-3263 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-22T01:41:31Z |
publishDate | 2020-03-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Geosciences |
spelling | doaj.art-d08057b1fc82403a9603d772e3cd04932022-12-21T18:43:13ZengMDPI AGGeosciences2076-32632020-03-011039810.3390/geosciences10030098geosciences10030098Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical AspectsClaudio Scavia0Monica Barbero1Marta Castelli2Maddalena Marchelli3Daniele Peila4Giulia Torsello5Gianmarco Vallero6Department of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Environment, Land and Infrastructure Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyDepartment of Structural, Building and Geotechnical Engineering, Politecnico di Torino, C.so Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Turin, ItalyRockfalls evolve rapidly and unpredictably in mountain environments and can cause considerable losses to human societies, structures, economical activities, and also natural and historical heritage. Rockfall risk analyses are complex and multi-scale processes involving several disciplines and techniques. This complexity is due to the main features of rockfall phenomena, which are extremely variable over space and time. Today, a considerable number of methods exists for protecting land, as well as assessing and managing the risk level. These methodologies are often very different from each other, depending on the data required, the purposes of the analysis, and the reference scale adopted, i.e., the analysis level of detail. Nevertheless, several questions still remain open with reference to each phase of the hazard and risk process. This paper is devoted to a general overview of existing risk estimation methodologies and a critical analysis of some open questions with the aim of highlighting possible further research topics. A typical risk assessment framework is exemplified by analyzing a real case study. Each step of the process is treated at both the detailed and the large scale in order to highlight the main characteristics of each level of detail.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/3/98rockfall risk analysishazard analysisvulnerability assessmentrisk mitigationmulti-scale approachprotection devices conservation |
spellingShingle | Claudio Scavia Monica Barbero Marta Castelli Maddalena Marchelli Daniele Peila Giulia Torsello Gianmarco Vallero Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects Geosciences rockfall risk analysis hazard analysis vulnerability assessment risk mitigation multi-scale approach protection devices conservation |
title | Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects |
title_full | Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects |
title_fullStr | Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects |
title_short | Evaluating Rockfall Risk: Some Critical Aspects |
title_sort | evaluating rockfall risk some critical aspects |
topic | rockfall risk analysis hazard analysis vulnerability assessment risk mitigation multi-scale approach protection devices conservation |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3263/10/3/98 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT claudioscavia evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT monicabarbero evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT martacastelli evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT maddalenamarchelli evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT danielepeila evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT giuliatorsello evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects AT gianmarcovallero evaluatingrockfallrisksomecriticalaspects |