The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication
As an influential legal idea, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law has colored various legal discourses and practices in Indonesia. Court decisions, as legal texts that record and summarize the trial process, also show that litigants, experts, and court judges often use this legal idea. This research...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2023-09-01
|
Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2133 |
_version_ | 1797688994860892160 |
---|---|
author | Muhammad Zulfa Aulia Bimo Fajar Hantoro Wawan Sanjaya Mahrus Ali |
author_facet | Muhammad Zulfa Aulia Bimo Fajar Hantoro Wawan Sanjaya Mahrus Ali |
author_sort | Muhammad Zulfa Aulia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | As an influential legal idea, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law has colored various legal discourses and practices in Indonesia. Court decisions, as legal texts that record and summarize the trial process, also show that litigants, experts, and court judges often use this legal idea. This research will examine how progressive legal phrases are used in court decisions and whether the users have considered their underlying assumptions, pillars, or principles. This research is limited to Constitutional Court decisions in law review cases. The use of progressive legal phrases is generally accompanied by several progressive legal assumptions proposed by Satjipto Rahardjo. However, these are selected and used partially according to the needs and interests of their users, and thus can have bias implications when compared and examined comprehensively based on other assumptions or pillars. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:39:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d082383906de4b58b8c8ada4b486b0b9 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T01:39:31Z |
publishDate | 2023-09-01 |
publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
record_format | Article |
series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
spelling | doaj.art-d082383906de4b58b8c8ada4b486b0b92023-09-11T00:30:55ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572023-09-0120342345010.31078/jk3034895The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and ImplicationMuhammad Zulfa Aulia0https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9649-6791Bimo Fajar Hantoro1https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5959-7849Wawan Sanjaya2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0871-7631Mahrus Ali3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5864-1009Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaUniversity of Illinois College of Law, Champaign, United StatesFaculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaFaculty of Law, Universitas Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, IndonesiaAs an influential legal idea, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law has colored various legal discourses and practices in Indonesia. Court decisions, as legal texts that record and summarize the trial process, also show that litigants, experts, and court judges often use this legal idea. This research will examine how progressive legal phrases are used in court decisions and whether the users have considered their underlying assumptions, pillars, or principles. This research is limited to Constitutional Court decisions in law review cases. The use of progressive legal phrases is generally accompanied by several progressive legal assumptions proposed by Satjipto Rahardjo. However, these are selected and used partially according to the needs and interests of their users, and thus can have bias implications when compared and examined comprehensively based on other assumptions or pillars.https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2133progressive lawthe use of phrasecourt decisionhukum progresifpenggunaan frasaputusan pengadilan |
spellingShingle | Muhammad Zulfa Aulia Bimo Fajar Hantoro Wawan Sanjaya Mahrus Ali The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication Jurnal Konstitusi progressive law the use of phrase court decision hukum progresif penggunaan frasa putusan pengadilan |
title | The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication |
title_full | The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication |
title_fullStr | The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication |
title_full_unstemmed | The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication |
title_short | The Use of Progressive Law Phrase in Constitutional Court Decisions: Context, Meaning, and Implication |
title_sort | use of progressive law phrase in constitutional court decisions context meaning and implication |
topic | progressive law the use of phrase court decision hukum progresif penggunaan frasa putusan pengadilan |
url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/2133 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muhammadzulfaaulia theuseofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT bimofajarhantoro theuseofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT wawansanjaya theuseofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT mahrusali theuseofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT muhammadzulfaaulia useofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT bimofajarhantoro useofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT wawansanjaya useofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication AT mahrusali useofprogressivelawphraseinconstitutionalcourtdecisionscontextmeaningandimplication |