Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine

The challenges of sustainability are transversal to all human activities, and the wine sector has its own role to play in the march for a more sustainable development. The proper definition of the most adequate measures and/or policies must be based on an objective and quantitative evaluation of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martins A.A., Costa M.C., Araújo A.R., Morgado A., Pereira J.M., Fontes N., Graça A., Caetano N.S., Mata T.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2019-01-01
Series:BIO Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_03017/bioconf-oiv2018_03017.html
_version_ 1818727081118269440
author Martins A.A.
Costa M.C.
Araújo A.R.
Morgado A.
Pereira J.M.
Fontes N.
Graça A.
Caetano N.S.
Mata T.M.
author_facet Martins A.A.
Costa M.C.
Araújo A.R.
Morgado A.
Pereira J.M.
Fontes N.
Graça A.
Caetano N.S.
Mata T.M.
author_sort Martins A.A.
collection DOAJ
description The challenges of sustainability are transversal to all human activities, and the wine sector has its own role to play in the march for a more sustainable development. The proper definition of the most adequate measures and/or policies must be based on an objective and quantitative evaluation of the sustainability of a product or process. In this work the sustainability of a “terroir” wine is assessed taking into account its life cycle and using the following indicators: carbon and water footprint, material intensity, solid waste generated, worker turnover rate, investment in H&S training and EBITDA. All indicators are expressed per functional unit of 0.75 L of wine. The evaluation used data from the company complemented with data/information from the literature or life cycle inventory databases. To account for climatic variability, data from three consecutive years was used. Average values of 3.51 kgCO2eq and 481.4 L per functional unit were obtained for the carbon and water footprint respectively, both values within the range of values reported in the literature.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:08:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d08925ada7a84b79b2db7cc3d84db088
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2117-4458
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:08:25Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series BIO Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-d08925ada7a84b79b2db7cc3d84db0882022-12-21T21:30:47ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582019-01-01120301710.1051/bioconf/20191203017bioconf-oiv2018_03017Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wineMartins A.A.0Costa M.C.1Araújo A.R.2Morgado A.3Pereira J.M.4Fontes N.5Graça A.6Caetano N.S.Mata T.M.7LEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NLEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NLEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NLEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NLEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NSogrape Vinhos, S.ASogrape Vinhos, S.ALEPABE, Faculty of Engineering-University of Porto (FEUP), R. Dr. Roberto Frias S/NThe challenges of sustainability are transversal to all human activities, and the wine sector has its own role to play in the march for a more sustainable development. The proper definition of the most adequate measures and/or policies must be based on an objective and quantitative evaluation of the sustainability of a product or process. In this work the sustainability of a “terroir” wine is assessed taking into account its life cycle and using the following indicators: carbon and water footprint, material intensity, solid waste generated, worker turnover rate, investment in H&S training and EBITDA. All indicators are expressed per functional unit of 0.75 L of wine. The evaluation used data from the company complemented with data/information from the literature or life cycle inventory databases. To account for climatic variability, data from three consecutive years was used. Average values of 3.51 kgCO2eq and 481.4 L per functional unit were obtained for the carbon and water footprint respectively, both values within the range of values reported in the literature.https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_03017/bioconf-oiv2018_03017.html
spellingShingle Martins A.A.
Costa M.C.
Araújo A.R.
Morgado A.
Pereira J.M.
Fontes N.
Graça A.
Caetano N.S.
Mata T.M.
Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
BIO Web of Conferences
title Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
title_full Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
title_fullStr Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
title_full_unstemmed Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
title_short Sustainability evaluation of a Portuguese “terroir” wine
title_sort sustainability evaluation of a portuguese terroir wine
url https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2019/01/bioconf-oiv2018_03017/bioconf-oiv2018_03017.html
work_keys_str_mv AT martinsaa sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT costamc sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT araujoar sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT morgadoa sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT pereirajm sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT fontesn sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT gracaa sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT caetanons sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine
AT matatm sustainabilityevaluationofaportugueseterroirwine