Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)

[b]Introduction[/b]. The airborne transmission of infectious diseases in livestock production is increasingly receiving research attention. Reliable techniques of air sampling are crucial to underpin the findings of such studies. This study evaluated the physical and biological efficiencies and dete...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yang Zhao, Andre J.A. Aarnink, Wei Wang, Teun Fabri, Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp, Mart C.M. de Jong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Rural Health 2014-09-01
Series:Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=1120585
_version_ 1830441810978144256
author Yang Zhao
Andre J.A. Aarnink
Wei Wang
Teun Fabri
Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp
Mart C.M. de Jong
author_facet Yang Zhao
Andre J.A. Aarnink
Wei Wang
Teun Fabri
Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp
Mart C.M. de Jong
author_sort Yang Zhao
collection DOAJ
description [b]Introduction[/b]. The airborne transmission of infectious diseases in livestock production is increasingly receiving research attention. Reliable techniques of air sampling are crucial to underpin the findings of such studies. This study evaluated the physical and biological efficiencies and detection limits of four samplers (Andersen 6-stage impactor, all-glass impinger “AGI-30”, OMNI-3000 and MD8 with gelatin filter) for collecting aerosols of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). [b]Materials and Method[/b]. IBDV aerosols mixed with a physical tracer (uranine) were generated in an isolator, and then collected by the bioaerosol samplers. Samplers’ physical and biological efficiencies were derived based on the tracer concentration and the virus/tracer ratio, respectively. Detection limits for the samplers were estimated with the obtained efficiency data. [b]Results.[/b] Physical efficiencies of the AGI-30 (96%) and the MD8 (100%) were significantly higher than that of the OMNI-3000 (60%). Biological efficiency of the OMNI-3000 (23%) was significantly lower than 100% (P < 0.01), indicating inactivation of airborne virus during sampling. The AGI-30, the Andersen impactor and the MD8 did not significantly inactivate virus during sampling. The 2-min detection limits of the samplers on airborne IBDV were 4.1 log[sub]10[/sub] 50% egg infective dose (EID[sub]50[/sub]) m [sup]-3[/sup] for the Andersen impactor, 3.3 log[sub]10[/sub] EID50 m [sup]-3[/sup] for the AGI-30, 2.5 log[sub]10[/sub] EID50 m [sup]-3[/sup] for the OMNI-3000, and 2.9 log[sub]10[/sub] EID[sub]50[/sub] m [sup]-3[/sup] for the MD8. The mean half-life of IBDV aerosolized at 20 °C and 70% was 11.9 min. Conclusion. Efficiencies of different samplers vary. Despite its relatively low sampling efficiency, the OMNI-3000 is suitable for use in environments with low viral concentrations because its high flow rate gives a low detection limit. With the 4 samplers investigated, negative air samples cannot guarantee virus-free aerial environments, which means that transmission of infectious agents between farms may still occur even when no virus has been detected.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T05:28:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0a2bc8fa5fe4f6b95f061636a725d43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1232-1966
1898-2263
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T05:28:10Z
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Institute of Rural Health
record_format Article
series Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d0a2bc8fa5fe4f6b95f061636a725d432022-12-21T19:14:37ZengInstitute of Rural HealthAnnals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine1232-19661898-22632014-09-0121875194464471Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)Yang Zhao0Andre J.A. Aarnink1Wei Wang2Teun Fabri3Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp4Mart C.M. de Jong5 Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands; Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Iowa State University, USA Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands Animal Health Service (GD), Deventer, The Netherlands Animal Health Service (GD), Deventer, The Netherlands Farm Technology Group, Wageningen University, The NetherlandsQuantitative Veterinary Epidemiology, Wageningen University, The Netherlands [b]Introduction[/b]. The airborne transmission of infectious diseases in livestock production is increasingly receiving research attention. Reliable techniques of air sampling are crucial to underpin the findings of such studies. This study evaluated the physical and biological efficiencies and detection limits of four samplers (Andersen 6-stage impactor, all-glass impinger “AGI-30”, OMNI-3000 and MD8 with gelatin filter) for collecting aerosols of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV). [b]Materials and Method[/b]. IBDV aerosols mixed with a physical tracer (uranine) were generated in an isolator, and then collected by the bioaerosol samplers. Samplers’ physical and biological efficiencies were derived based on the tracer concentration and the virus/tracer ratio, respectively. Detection limits for the samplers were estimated with the obtained efficiency data. [b]Results.[/b] Physical efficiencies of the AGI-30 (96%) and the MD8 (100%) were significantly higher than that of the OMNI-3000 (60%). Biological efficiency of the OMNI-3000 (23%) was significantly lower than 100% (P < 0.01), indicating inactivation of airborne virus during sampling. The AGI-30, the Andersen impactor and the MD8 did not significantly inactivate virus during sampling. The 2-min detection limits of the samplers on airborne IBDV were 4.1 log[sub]10[/sub] 50% egg infective dose (EID[sub]50[/sub]) m [sup]-3[/sup] for the Andersen impactor, 3.3 log[sub]10[/sub] EID50 m [sup]-3[/sup] for the AGI-30, 2.5 log[sub]10[/sub] EID50 m [sup]-3[/sup] for the OMNI-3000, and 2.9 log[sub]10[/sub] EID[sub]50[/sub] m [sup]-3[/sup] for the MD8. The mean half-life of IBDV aerosolized at 20 °C and 70% was 11.9 min. Conclusion. Efficiencies of different samplers vary. Despite its relatively low sampling efficiency, the OMNI-3000 is suitable for use in environments with low viral concentrations because its high flow rate gives a low detection limit. With the 4 samplers investigated, negative air samples cannot guarantee virus-free aerial environments, which means that transmission of infectious agents between farms may still occur even when no virus has been detected.http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=1120585Gumboro virus;bioaerosol;sampling efficiency;airborne transmission
spellingShingle Yang Zhao
Andre J.A. Aarnink
Wei Wang
Teun Fabri
Peter W.G. Groot Koerkamp
Mart C.M. de Jong
Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
Gumboro virus;bioaerosol;sampling efficiency;airborne transmission
title Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
title_full Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
title_fullStr Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
title_full_unstemmed Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
title_short Airborne virus sampling: Efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV)
title_sort airborne virus sampling efficiencies of samplers and their detection limits for infectious bursal disease virus ibdv
topic Gumboro virus;bioaerosol;sampling efficiency;airborne transmission
url http://journals.indexcopernicus.com/fulltxt.php?ICID=1120585
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzhao airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv
AT andrejaaarnink airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv
AT weiwang airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv
AT teunfabri airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv
AT peterwggrootkoerkamp airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv
AT martcmdejong airbornevirussamplingefficienciesofsamplersandtheirdetectionlimitsforinfectiousbursaldiseasevirusibdv