COMPARISON OF DINOPROSTONE PLUS ‎OXYTOCIN AND OXYTOCIN ALONE FOR INDUCTION ‎OF LABOR

COMPARISON OF DINOPROSTONE PLUS ‎OXYTOCIN AND OXYTOCIN ALONE FOR INDUCTION ‎OF LABOR

Show other versions (1)

Role of labor induction has increased in the last decade due to the ‎early detection of fetal jeopardy. Although very useful, oxytocin alone is not always successful for induction of ‎labor. In a randomized clinical ‎trial we compared vaginal dinoprostone plus oxytocin with oxytocin alone for ‎induc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	‎M. Valadan, S. Niroomanesh, K. Noori, S. Khalilian M. Tehrani
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2005-08-01
Series:	Acta Medica Iranica
Subjects:	Induction cervical ripening dinoprostone
Online Access:	https://acta.tums.ac.ir/index.php/acta/article/view/3005

Similar Items

COMPARISON OF DINOPROSTONE PLUS ‎OXYTOCIN AND OXYTOCIN ALONE FOR INDUCTION ‎OF LABOR
by: ‎M. Valadan, et al.
Published: (2005-07-01)

Comparison of Two Methods in Labor Induction in Nulliparous Women with Unfavorable Cervix at Term: Oxytocin Alone Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Slow-Release System (Propess®) + Oxytocin
by: Tunç Canda, et al.
Published: (2010-12-01)

Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
by: Khaled Ibrahim Abu El aish, et al.
Published: (2013-06-01)

Oral misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal tablets for labor induction
by: Khaled İbrahim Abu El AİSH, et al.
Published: (2013-09-01)

Induction of Labor: A Comparative Study of Intravaginal Misoprostol and Dinoprostone
by: Aqueela Ayaz
Published: (2010-06-01)

Labor induction in term nulliparous women with premature rupture of membranes: oxytocin versus dinoprostone
by: Nur Gozde Kulhan, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Is Low Dose Vaginal Misoprostol Better Than Dinoprostone Gel For Induction of Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Monika Madaan, et al.
Published: (2014-09-01)

Sublingual misoprostol versus dinoprostone gel in labour induction
by: Juveria Jahangir, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

Prostaglandins in the induction of labour – do we have the optimal substance, dose, and route of administration? Literature review
by: Jakub Mlodawski, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Term induction of labour in nulliparous women: When to draw the line?
by: Jill M. Mitchell, et al.
Published: (2022-08-01)

Dinoprostone vaginal insert vs the Foley catheter in labor induction. Observational study
by: Jakub Mlodawski, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Using dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor: A single institute experience
by: Jen-Yu Tseng, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01)

Comparison of the Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert and Dinoprostone Tablet for the Induction of Labor in Primipara: A Retrospective Cohort Study
by: Ning-Shiuan Ting, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Is there an interest in repeating the vaginal administration of dinoprostone (Propess®), to promote induction of labor of pregnant women at term? (RE-DINO): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
by: P. Coste Mazeau, et al.
Published: (2020-01-01)

The role of dinoprostone for labor induction in postterm and high-risk term pregnancies
by: I.F. Urunsak, et al.
Published: (2020-10-01)

Maternal serum progesterone, estradiol and estriol levels in successful dinoprostone-induced labor
by: C.K. Konopka, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)

Dinoprostone tablet versus continuous vaginal insert (Propess®) for elective induction in low-risk nulliparous women at term
by: Yu-Cheng Nien, et al.
Published: (2023-11-01)

Double Balloon Catheter (Plus Oxytocin) versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert for Term Rupture of Membranes: A Randomized Controlled Trial (RUBAPRO)
by: Eric Devillard, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Comparing the effectiveness and safety of Dinoprostone vaginal insert and double-balloon catheter as cervical ripening treatments in Chinese patients
by: Jinjing Yan, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Comparative Study of Intracervical Prostaglandin E2 and Intravenous Oxytocin for Induction of Term Labor
by: S Khavari, et al.
Published: (2001-06-01)

The Successful Use of Nitroglycerin for Uterine Hyperstimulation with Fetal Heart Rate Abnormality Caused by a Controlled-Release Dinoprostone Vaginal Delivery System (PROPESS): A Case Report
by: Sho Takakura, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Efficacy and safety of administering oral misoprostol by titration compared to vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical ripening and induction of labour: study protocol for a randomised clinical trial
by: O. Lapuente-Ocamica, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Safety and efficacy of double-balloon catheter for cervical ripening: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Ge Zhao, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Comparative Analytical Study of Dinoprostone Gel and Hyaluronidase Injection for Induction of Labour in Term Primigravida in Tertiary Rural Medical Centre of Western Uttar Pradesh
by: Neelam Swaroop, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert versus Cervical Ripening Balloon for Term Induction of Labor in Obese Nulliparas—A Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Roy Lauterbach, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

"A comparison of vaginal Misoprostol with intravenous Oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction "
by: Eftekhari N, et al.
Published: (2002-12-01)

"A comparison of vaginal Misoprostol with intravenous Oxytocin for cervical ripening and labor induction "
by: Eftekhari N, et al.
Published: (2002-08-01)

Effects of gestational diabetes mellitus on time to delivery and pregnancy outcomes in full-term pregnancies with dinoprostone labor induction
by: Ting-ting Jiang, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Propess versus prostin for induction of labour in term primiparous women
by: Chien-Hui Hung, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Pilot Study of Labor Induction with Titrated oral Misoprostol
by: Shi-Yann Cheng, et al.
Published: (2006-09-01)

Titrated oral misoprostol solution compared with oxytocin for induction of labor in women with unfavorable cervix
by: Akrami M, et al.
Published: (2011-10-01)

SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF SUBLINGUAL MISOPROSTOL AND INTRACERVICAL DINOPROSTONE GEL AS CERVICAL RIPENING AGENT IN TERM PRELABOUR RUPTURE OF MEMBRANES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY
by: Monica R, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

The effect of dexamethasone on labor induction: a systematic review
by: Zaynab Mohaghegh, et al.
Published: (2021-08-01)

Conventional versus modified application of COOK Cervical Ripening Balloon for induction of labor at term: a randomized controlled trial
by: Chaoyue Wen, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

The Efficacy of Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts for Induction of Labor in Women with Very Unfavorable Cervices
by: Maciej W. Socha, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

A cross-sectional study on incidence and indications for induction of labor and the factors associated with failure of induction
by: Kalpana N, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

Influence of morning versus midnight initiation of induction of labour in late-term pregnancy on perinatal outcome and time of birth
by: Danijel Bursać, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

A Comparison Between Sublingual Misoprostol and Intravenous Oxytocin for Inducing labor in Women with Term Pregnancy
by: Leila Habibi, et al.
Published: (2012-09-01)

Prostaglandin insert dinoprostone versus trans-cervical balloon catheter for outpatient labour induction: a randomised controlled trial of feasibility (PROBIT-F)
by: Amarnath Bhide, et al.
Published: (2020-08-01)

A comparison of misoprostol vaginal insert and misoprostol vaginal tablets for induction of labor in nulliparous women: a retrospective cohort study
by: Kjersti Engen Marsdal, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)