The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned
BackgroundWe describe our experiences with identifying and recruiting Ontario parents through the Internet, primarily, as well as other modes, for participation in focus groups about adding the influenza vaccine to school-based immunization programs. ObjectiveOur objectives were to asse...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2013-11-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| Online Access: | http://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e250/ |
| _version_ | 1818874658373500928 |
|---|---|
| author | Quach, Susan Pereira, Jennifer A Russell, Margaret L Wormsbecker, Anne E Ramsay, Hilary Crowe, Lois Quan, Sherman D Kwong, Jeff |
| author_facet | Quach, Susan Pereira, Jennifer A Russell, Margaret L Wormsbecker, Anne E Ramsay, Hilary Crowe, Lois Quan, Sherman D Kwong, Jeff |
| author_sort | Quach, Susan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | BackgroundWe describe our experiences with identifying and recruiting Ontario parents through the Internet, primarily, as well as other modes, for participation in focus groups about adding the influenza vaccine to school-based immunization programs.
ObjectiveOur objectives were to assess participation rates with and without incentives and software restrictions. We also plan to examine study response patterns of unique and multiple submissions and assess efficiency of each online advertising mode.
MethodsWe used social media, deal forum websites, online classified ads, conventional mass media, and email lists to invite parents of school-aged children from Ontario, Canada to complete an online questionnaire to determine eligibility for focus groups. We compared responses and paradata when an incentive was provided and there were no software restrictions to the questionnaire (Period 1) to a period when only a single submission per Internet protocol (IP) address (ie, software restrictions invoked) was permitted and no incentive was provided (Period 2). We also compared the median time to complete a questionnaire, response patterns, and percentage of missing data between questionnaires classified as multiple submissions from the same Internet protocol (IP) address or email versus unique submissions. Efficiency was calculated as the total number of hours study personnel devoted to an advertising mode divided by the resultant number of unique eligible completed questionnaires .
ResultsOf 1346 submitted questionnaires, 223 (16.6%) were incomplete and 34 (2.52%) did not meet the initial eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 1089 questionnaires, 246 (22.6%) were not from Ontario based on IP address and postal code, and 469 (43.1%) were submitted from the same IP address or email address (multiple submissions). In Period 2 vs Period 1, a larger proportion of questionnaires were submitted from Ontario (92.8%, 141/152 vs 75.1%, 702/937, P<.001), and a smaller proportion of same IP addresses (7.9%, 12/152 vs 47.1%, 441/937, P<.001) were received. Compared to those who made unique submissions, those who made multiple submissions spent less time per questionnaire (166 vs 215 seconds, P<.001), and had a higher percentage of missing data among their responses (15.0% vs 7.6%, P=.004). Advertisements posted on RedFlagDeals were the most efficient for recruitment (0.03 hours of staff time per questionnaire), whereas those placed on Twitter were the least efficient (3.64 hours of staff time per questionnaire).
ConclusionsUsing multiple online advertising strategies was effective for recruiting a large sample of participants in a relatively short period time with minimal resources. However, risks such as multiple submissions and potentially fraudulent information need to be considered. In our study, these problems were associated with providing an incentive for responding, and could have been partially avoided by activating restrictive software features for online questionnaires. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:14:06Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d0aec3010a63470bb19bfbf642a26eb9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1438-8871 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-19T13:14:06Z |
| publishDate | 2013-11-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| spelling | doaj.art-d0aec3010a63470bb19bfbf642a26eb92022-12-21T20:19:52ZengJMIR PublicationsJournal of Medical Internet Research1438-88712013-11-011511e25010.2196/jmir.2829The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons LearnedQuach, SusanPereira, Jennifer ARussell, Margaret LWormsbecker, Anne ERamsay, HilaryCrowe, LoisQuan, Sherman DKwong, JeffBackgroundWe describe our experiences with identifying and recruiting Ontario parents through the Internet, primarily, as well as other modes, for participation in focus groups about adding the influenza vaccine to school-based immunization programs. ObjectiveOur objectives were to assess participation rates with and without incentives and software restrictions. We also plan to examine study response patterns of unique and multiple submissions and assess efficiency of each online advertising mode. MethodsWe used social media, deal forum websites, online classified ads, conventional mass media, and email lists to invite parents of school-aged children from Ontario, Canada to complete an online questionnaire to determine eligibility for focus groups. We compared responses and paradata when an incentive was provided and there were no software restrictions to the questionnaire (Period 1) to a period when only a single submission per Internet protocol (IP) address (ie, software restrictions invoked) was permitted and no incentive was provided (Period 2). We also compared the median time to complete a questionnaire, response patterns, and percentage of missing data between questionnaires classified as multiple submissions from the same Internet protocol (IP) address or email versus unique submissions. Efficiency was calculated as the total number of hours study personnel devoted to an advertising mode divided by the resultant number of unique eligible completed questionnaires . ResultsOf 1346 submitted questionnaires, 223 (16.6%) were incomplete and 34 (2.52%) did not meet the initial eligibility criteria. Of the remaining 1089 questionnaires, 246 (22.6%) were not from Ontario based on IP address and postal code, and 469 (43.1%) were submitted from the same IP address or email address (multiple submissions). In Period 2 vs Period 1, a larger proportion of questionnaires were submitted from Ontario (92.8%, 141/152 vs 75.1%, 702/937, P<.001), and a smaller proportion of same IP addresses (7.9%, 12/152 vs 47.1%, 441/937, P<.001) were received. Compared to those who made unique submissions, those who made multiple submissions spent less time per questionnaire (166 vs 215 seconds, P<.001), and had a higher percentage of missing data among their responses (15.0% vs 7.6%, P=.004). Advertisements posted on RedFlagDeals were the most efficient for recruitment (0.03 hours of staff time per questionnaire), whereas those placed on Twitter were the least efficient (3.64 hours of staff time per questionnaire). ConclusionsUsing multiple online advertising strategies was effective for recruiting a large sample of participants in a relatively short period time with minimal resources. However, risks such as multiple submissions and potentially fraudulent information need to be considered. In our study, these problems were associated with providing an incentive for responding, and could have been partially avoided by activating restrictive software features for online questionnaires.http://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e250/ |
| spellingShingle | Quach, Susan Pereira, Jennifer A Russell, Margaret L Wormsbecker, Anne E Ramsay, Hilary Crowe, Lois Quan, Sherman D Kwong, Jeff The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned Journal of Medical Internet Research |
| title | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned |
| title_full | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned |
| title_fullStr | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned |
| title_full_unstemmed | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned |
| title_short | The Good, Bad, and Ugly of Online Recruitment of Parents for Health-Related Focus Groups: Lessons Learned |
| title_sort | good bad and ugly of online recruitment of parents for health related focus groups lessons learned |
| url | http://www.jmir.org/2013/11/e250/ |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT quachsusan thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT pereirajennifera thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT russellmargaretl thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT wormsbeckerannee thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT ramsayhilary thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT crowelois thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT quanshermand thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT kwongjeff thegoodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT quachsusan goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT pereirajennifera goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT russellmargaretl goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT wormsbeckerannee goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT ramsayhilary goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT crowelois goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT quanshermand goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned AT kwongjeff goodbadanduglyofonlinerecruitmentofparentsforhealthrelatedfocusgroupslessonslearned |