Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes

Abstract Objectives Ankle fractures are common and can be treated with or without surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare patient reported outcomes between patients who sustained an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-B1 ankle fracture who had either surgical or non-surgical fixation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rajat Mittal, Prajith Jeyaprakash, Ian A. Harris, Justine M. Naylor
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-07-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2676-8
_version_ 1818145085442752512
author Rajat Mittal
Prajith Jeyaprakash
Ian A. Harris
Justine M. Naylor
author_facet Rajat Mittal
Prajith Jeyaprakash
Ian A. Harris
Justine M. Naylor
author_sort Rajat Mittal
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Ankle fractures are common and can be treated with or without surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare patient reported outcomes between patients who sustained an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-B1 ankle fracture who had either surgical or non-surgical fixation. Results Forty-six people were recruited; 38 were treated non-surgically and 8 were treated surgically. Mean follow-up time was 24 and 25 months for surgical and non-surgical groups respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. On unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to any outcome. After adjusting for age and gender, the surgical group had a significantly lower outcome score with respect to the FAOQ. Surgical management was associated with a significantly lower patient-reported ankle function compared to non-surgical management for the treatment of patients with type 44-B1 ankle fracture after adjusting for age and gender. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the general health outcomes or adverse events. Higher-level evidence is required to inform optimal practice for this common fracture.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T11:57:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0b5afea523e437aae06f25369619705
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T11:57:51Z
publishDate 2017-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-d0b5afea523e437aae06f253696197052022-12-22T01:08:10ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002017-07-011011510.1186/s13104-017-2676-8Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomesRajat Mittal0Prajith Jeyaprakash1Ian A. Harris2Justine M. Naylor3Whitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSWUniversity of New South WalesWhitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSWWhitlam Orthopaedic Research Centre, Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, South Western Sydney Clinical School, UNSWAbstract Objectives Ankle fractures are common and can be treated with or without surgery. The aim of the present study was to compare patient reported outcomes between patients who sustained an Orthopaedic Trauma Association type 44-B1 ankle fracture who had either surgical or non-surgical fixation. Results Forty-six people were recruited; 38 were treated non-surgically and 8 were treated surgically. Mean follow-up time was 24 and 25 months for surgical and non-surgical groups respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. On unadjusted analysis, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to any outcome. After adjusting for age and gender, the surgical group had a significantly lower outcome score with respect to the FAOQ. Surgical management was associated with a significantly lower patient-reported ankle function compared to non-surgical management for the treatment of patients with type 44-B1 ankle fracture after adjusting for age and gender. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the general health outcomes or adverse events. Higher-level evidence is required to inform optimal practice for this common fracture.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2676-8AnkleFracturePatient-reported ankle function
spellingShingle Rajat Mittal
Prajith Jeyaprakash
Ian A. Harris
Justine M. Naylor
Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
BMC Research Notes
Ankle
Fracture
Patient-reported ankle function
title Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
title_full Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
title_fullStr Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
title_short Type B ankle fractures: a retrospective study of longer-term outcomes
title_sort type b ankle fractures a retrospective study of longer term outcomes
topic Ankle
Fracture
Patient-reported ankle function
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13104-017-2676-8
work_keys_str_mv AT rajatmittal typebanklefracturesaretrospectivestudyoflongertermoutcomes
AT prajithjeyaprakash typebanklefracturesaretrospectivestudyoflongertermoutcomes
AT ianaharris typebanklefracturesaretrospectivestudyoflongertermoutcomes
AT justinemnaylor typebanklefracturesaretrospectivestudyoflongertermoutcomes