On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory

Recent years have seen a renewed interest in the traditional pre-Keynesian quantity theory. This paper is concerned with the contention that - in the formal development of this theory in the past - a change in the quantity of money expends itself solely in influencing the price level, but not the vo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: D. PATINKIN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Associazione Economia civile 2013-11-01
Series:PSL Quarterly Review
Subjects:
Online Access:https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/11125
_version_ 1811172536504811520
author D. PATINKIN
author_facet D. PATINKIN
author_sort D. PATINKIN
collection DOAJ
description Recent years have seen a renewed interest in the traditional pre-Keynesian quantity theory. This paper is concerned with the contention that - in the formal development of this theory in the past - a change in the quantity of money expends itself solely in influencing the price level, but not the volume of output even in the short run. This contention about the nature of the theory seems to be common both to its critics and to at least one of its modern-day adherents. The author examines the writings of Irving Fisher, the Chicago school, the Cambridge economists, and other quantity theorists to determine the validity of the interpretations put forth by Lawrence Ritter and Milton Friedman.   JEL: E31, E40, E51
first_indexed 2024-04-10T17:31:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0c25393878b4f0594721a6f4ed29403
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2037-3635
2037-3643
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T17:31:49Z
publishDate 2013-11-01
publisher Associazione Economia civile
record_format Article
series PSL Quarterly Review
spelling doaj.art-d0c25393878b4f0594721a6f4ed294032023-02-03T16:45:22ZengAssociazione Economia civilePSL Quarterly Review2037-36352037-36432013-11-012510010.13133/2037-3643/11125On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theoryD. PATINKINRecent years have seen a renewed interest in the traditional pre-Keynesian quantity theory. This paper is concerned with the contention that - in the formal development of this theory in the past - a change in the quantity of money expends itself solely in influencing the price level, but not the volume of output even in the short run. This contention about the nature of the theory seems to be common both to its critics and to at least one of its modern-day adherents. The author examines the writings of Irving Fisher, the Chicago school, the Cambridge economists, and other quantity theorists to determine the validity of the interpretations put forth by Lawrence Ritter and Milton Friedman.   JEL: E31, E40, E51 https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/11125Quantity theorynon-neutrality of moneyFisherChicago SchoolRitterFriedman
spellingShingle D. PATINKIN
On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
PSL Quarterly Review
Quantity theory
non-neutrality of money
Fisher
Chicago School
Ritter
Friedman
title On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
title_full On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
title_fullStr On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
title_full_unstemmed On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
title_short On the short-run non-neutrality of money in the quantity theory
title_sort on the short run non neutrality of money in the quantity theory
topic Quantity theory
non-neutrality of money
Fisher
Chicago School
Ritter
Friedman
url https://rosa.uniroma1.it/rosa04/psl_quarterly_review/article/view/11125
work_keys_str_mv AT dpatinkin ontheshortrunnonneutralityofmoneyinthequantitytheory