Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes
(1) Background: To compare the results of a new intraoperative contactless device (INTEGRA Optomed, Poland) with the result of a manual method for determining the axis for toric intraocular lens implantation. (2) Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 60 eyes of 40 pat...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-09-01
|
| Series: | Healthcare |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/9/1773 |
| _version_ | 1797487802154221568 |
|---|---|
| author | Marcin Jaworski Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska Piotr Jaworski Michał Kowalski Krzysztof Jaskot Robert Bieda |
| author_facet | Marcin Jaworski Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska Piotr Jaworski Michał Kowalski Krzysztof Jaskot Robert Bieda |
| author_sort | Marcin Jaworski |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (1) Background: To compare the results of a new intraoperative contactless device (INTEGRA Optomed, Poland) with the result of a manual method for determining the axis for toric intraocular lens implantation. (2) Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 60 eyes of 40 patients (17 men, 23 women) who had toric intraocular lenses implanted. A video recording of each surgery that used the INTEGRA system was made for the analysis. Two researchers then independently assessed the location of the implant axes determined with both digital and manual slit-lamp methods, and compared the results between methods. (3) Results: The implantation axes suggested through the manual and INTEGRA methods were similar. The median axis disparities were 0.0 degrees for both groups. The standard deviation was 0.63 and 0.75 for researcher 1 and 2, respectively. The dominant value was 0.0 in both groups. The INTEGRA axis designation was statistically significantly different from the manual method for researcher 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but it was statistically insignificant for researcher 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.79). (4) Conclusions: The INTEGRA system is a digital ink-free device for image tracking scleral vessels. It was helpful for determining the implantation axis in a precise manner, and the measurements were comparable with those obtained through a manual technique. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:52:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d0c867b714ca469e91b9178fd7200cba |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2227-9032 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T23:52:59Z |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Healthcare |
| spelling | doaj.art-d0c867b714ca469e91b9178fd7200cba2023-11-23T16:30:41ZengMDPI AGHealthcare2227-90322022-09-01109177310.3390/healthcare10091773Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 EyesMarcin Jaworski0Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska1Piotr Jaworski2Michał Kowalski3Krzysztof Jaskot4Robert Bieda5Ophthalmological Center for Children and Adults Optomed, 41-500 Chorzów, PolandDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, PolandOphthalmological Center for Children and Adults Optomed, 41-500 Chorzów, PolandSalMed Michał Kowalski, 91-502 Łódź, PolandDepartment of Automatic Control and Robotics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, PolandDepartment of Automatic Control and Robotics, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland(1) Background: To compare the results of a new intraoperative contactless device (INTEGRA Optomed, Poland) with the result of a manual method for determining the axis for toric intraocular lens implantation. (2) Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study included 60 eyes of 40 patients (17 men, 23 women) who had toric intraocular lenses implanted. A video recording of each surgery that used the INTEGRA system was made for the analysis. Two researchers then independently assessed the location of the implant axes determined with both digital and manual slit-lamp methods, and compared the results between methods. (3) Results: The implantation axes suggested through the manual and INTEGRA methods were similar. The median axis disparities were 0.0 degrees for both groups. The standard deviation was 0.63 and 0.75 for researcher 1 and 2, respectively. The dominant value was 0.0 in both groups. The INTEGRA axis designation was statistically significantly different from the manual method for researcher 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.05), but it was statistically insignificant for researcher 2 (<i>p</i> = 0.79). (4) Conclusions: The INTEGRA system is a digital ink-free device for image tracking scleral vessels. It was helpful for determining the implantation axis in a precise manner, and the measurements were comparable with those obtained through a manual technique.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/9/1773computer-assisted surgerydigital assisted surgeryaxis designationintegraintraoperative deviceaxis determination |
| spellingShingle | Marcin Jaworski Dorota Wyględowska-Promieńska Piotr Jaworski Michał Kowalski Krzysztof Jaskot Robert Bieda Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes Healthcare computer-assisted surgery digital assisted surgery axis designation integra intraoperative device axis determination |
| title | Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes |
| title_full | Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes |
| title_short | Comparison of INTEGRA and the Manual Method to Determine the Axis for Intraocular Lens Implantation—A Case Series of 60 Eyes |
| title_sort | comparison of integra and the manual method to determine the axis for intraocular lens implantation a case series of 60 eyes |
| topic | computer-assisted surgery digital assisted surgery axis designation integra intraoperative device axis determination |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9032/10/9/1773 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT marcinjaworski comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes AT dorotawygledowskapromienska comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes AT piotrjaworski comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes AT michałkowalski comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes AT krzysztofjaskot comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes AT robertbieda comparisonofintegraandthemanualmethodtodeterminetheaxisforintraocularlensimplantationacaseseriesof60eyes |