Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study
BackgroundPrevious research shows that providing social support in socioevaluative stress situations reduces participants’ stress responses. This stress-buffer effect, however, does not hold for everybody, and some studies even found a stress-amplifying effect of social suppo...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
JMIR Publications
2022-08-01
|
| Series: | JMIR Research Protocols |
| Online Access: | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/8/e39509 |
| _version_ | 1797734882536849408 |
|---|---|
| author | Alisa Haufler Beate Ditzen Julia Schüler |
| author_facet | Alisa Haufler Beate Ditzen Julia Schüler |
| author_sort | Alisa Haufler |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
BackgroundPrevious research shows that providing social support in socioevaluative stress situations reduces participants’ stress responses. This stress-buffer effect, however, does not hold for everybody, and some studies even found a stress-amplifying effect of social support. Motive disposition research suggests that social motives (affiliation and power) lead to differential and sometimes even opposing affective and physiological responses to interpersonal interaction processes. We here integrate both lines of research and hypothesize that participants with strong affiliation motives benefit, while participants with strong power motives do not benefit from social support in terms of psychobiological responses to a given stressor. Further, participants with strong affiliation and power motives are expected to respond to social support with the arousal of motive-specific affects and reproductive hormone responses (affiliation: progesterone; power: estradiol and testosterone). In addition, we test sex differences in the response to social support and in the strengths of social motives.
ObjectiveThe main objective of this study is to test whether social motives and participants’ sex moderate the effects of social support in stressful situations.
MethodsWe aim to collect data from 308 participants recruited at our local university. Participants’ social motives are assessed using a standardized measure in motive research (Picture Story Exercise). Then, the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G) is used to experimentally induce psychosocial stress. One group of participants receives social support from an associate of the experimenter, while the control group does not receive social support. Stress responses will be assessed by a modified version of the state anxiety scale of the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and by physiological indicators of stress (cortisol and α-amylase from saliva samples) at 7 measurement points. Reproductive hormones will be analyzed in 4 of these 7 saliva samples. Heart rate and heart rate variability will be assessed continuously. We will additionally measure participants’ performance in an interview (part of the TSST-G) using a self-developed categorization system.
ResultsThe Ethics Committee of the University of Constance approved the application to conduct the study on December 18, 2018. Furthermore, the study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DKRS; ID: DRKS00028503) on March 09, 2022. The start of the experiment was planned for the beginning of 2019, but was postponed to June 2021 due to COVID-19. Publication of the first results is planned for spring 2023.
ConclusionsOur theory-driven integration of social motives in social support research and the precise analysis of sex differences might disentangle inconsistent findings in TSST research. The more faceted view on individual differences has direct implications for applied contexts as it provides a framework for tailored conceptualizations of social support programs.
Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028503; https://tinyurl.com/5a87x4da
International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/39509 |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:50:56Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d0d9a90edcb148a98b79454c3d1b506e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1929-0748 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T12:50:56Z |
| publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
| publisher | JMIR Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JMIR Research Protocols |
| spelling | doaj.art-d0d9a90edcb148a98b79454c3d1b506e2023-08-28T22:50:00ZengJMIR PublicationsJMIR Research Protocols1929-07482022-08-01118e3950910.2196/39509Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized StudyAlisa Hauflerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5139-5733Beate Ditzenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-5853-4572Julia Schülerhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-7790-0491 BackgroundPrevious research shows that providing social support in socioevaluative stress situations reduces participants’ stress responses. This stress-buffer effect, however, does not hold for everybody, and some studies even found a stress-amplifying effect of social support. Motive disposition research suggests that social motives (affiliation and power) lead to differential and sometimes even opposing affective and physiological responses to interpersonal interaction processes. We here integrate both lines of research and hypothesize that participants with strong affiliation motives benefit, while participants with strong power motives do not benefit from social support in terms of psychobiological responses to a given stressor. Further, participants with strong affiliation and power motives are expected to respond to social support with the arousal of motive-specific affects and reproductive hormone responses (affiliation: progesterone; power: estradiol and testosterone). In addition, we test sex differences in the response to social support and in the strengths of social motives. ObjectiveThe main objective of this study is to test whether social motives and participants’ sex moderate the effects of social support in stressful situations. MethodsWe aim to collect data from 308 participants recruited at our local university. Participants’ social motives are assessed using a standardized measure in motive research (Picture Story Exercise). Then, the Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G) is used to experimentally induce psychosocial stress. One group of participants receives social support from an associate of the experimenter, while the control group does not receive social support. Stress responses will be assessed by a modified version of the state anxiety scale of the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory and by physiological indicators of stress (cortisol and α-amylase from saliva samples) at 7 measurement points. Reproductive hormones will be analyzed in 4 of these 7 saliva samples. Heart rate and heart rate variability will be assessed continuously. We will additionally measure participants’ performance in an interview (part of the TSST-G) using a self-developed categorization system. ResultsThe Ethics Committee of the University of Constance approved the application to conduct the study on December 18, 2018. Furthermore, the study was retrospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DKRS; ID: DRKS00028503) on March 09, 2022. The start of the experiment was planned for the beginning of 2019, but was postponed to June 2021 due to COVID-19. Publication of the first results is planned for spring 2023. ConclusionsOur theory-driven integration of social motives in social support research and the precise analysis of sex differences might disentangle inconsistent findings in TSST research. The more faceted view on individual differences has direct implications for applied contexts as it provides a framework for tailored conceptualizations of social support programs. Trial RegistrationGerman Clinical Trials Register DRKS00028503; https://tinyurl.com/5a87x4da International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)PRR1-10.2196/39509https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/8/e39509 |
| spellingShingle | Alisa Haufler Beate Ditzen Julia Schüler Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study JMIR Research Protocols |
| title | Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study |
| title_full | Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study |
| title_fullStr | Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study |
| title_short | Social Support as a Stress Buffer or Stress Amplifier and the Moderating Role of Implicit Motives: Protocol for a Randomized Study |
| title_sort | social support as a stress buffer or stress amplifier and the moderating role of implicit motives protocol for a randomized study |
| url | https://www.researchprotocols.org/2022/8/e39509 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT alisahaufler socialsupportasastressbufferorstressamplifierandthemoderatingroleofimplicitmotivesprotocolforarandomizedstudy AT beateditzen socialsupportasastressbufferorstressamplifierandthemoderatingroleofimplicitmotivesprotocolforarandomizedstudy AT juliaschuler socialsupportasastressbufferorstressamplifierandthemoderatingroleofimplicitmotivesprotocolforarandomizedstudy |