Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument

The different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Javad Danesh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Imam Sadiq University 2017-04-01
Series:پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
Subjects:
Online Access:https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdf
_version_ 1797272314417512448
author Javad Danesh
author_facet Javad Danesh
author_sort Javad Danesh
collection DOAJ
description The different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alternative possibilities, while (2) every type of human free will and moral responsibility is based on such an alternative possibility to be capable of being chosen. Agreeing with the incompatibility of causal determination and the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP), Frankfurt tries to call the dependence of moral responsibility on the PAP into question. It seems, however, that the Frankfurt-style approach against the indirect argument suffers from being ambiguous in the status of the intervener. It is also incapable of explaining the significance and function of alternative possibility.
first_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0e1df3ecc514b24aa25e29f46a4c849
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2228-6578
2228-6586
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-07T14:26:34Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Imam Sadiq University
record_format Article
series پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
spelling doaj.art-d0e1df3ecc514b24aa25e29f46a4c8492024-03-06T08:03:09ZfasImam Sadiq Universityپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین2228-65782228-65862017-04-01151557610.30497/prr.2017.19651965Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence ArgumentJavad Danesh0Assistant professor at Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, IranThe different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alternative possibilities, while (2) every type of human free will and moral responsibility is based on such an alternative possibility to be capable of being chosen. Agreeing with the incompatibility of causal determination and the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP), Frankfurt tries to call the dependence of moral responsibility on the PAP into question. It seems, however, that the Frankfurt-style approach against the indirect argument suffers from being ambiguous in the status of the intervener. It is also incapable of explaining the significance and function of alternative possibility.https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdfindirect argumentmoral responsibilitythe principle of alternative possibilitiesfrankfurtvan inwagen
spellingShingle Javad Danesh
Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین
indirect argument
moral responsibility
the principle of alternative possibilities
frankfurt
van inwagen
title Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
title_full Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
title_fullStr Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
title_short Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
title_sort evaluation of frankfurt s viewpoint in the face of indirect consequence argument
topic indirect argument
moral responsibility
the principle of alternative possibilities
frankfurt
van inwagen
url https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT javaddanesh evaluationoffrankfurtsviewpointinthefaceofindirectconsequenceargument