Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
The different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alter...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Imam Sadiq University
2017-04-01
|
Series: | پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdf |
_version_ | 1797272314417512448 |
---|---|
author | Javad Danesh |
author_facet | Javad Danesh |
author_sort | Javad Danesh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alternative possibilities, while (2) every type of human free will and moral responsibility is based on such an alternative possibility to be capable of being chosen. Agreeing with the incompatibility of causal determination and the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP), Frankfurt tries to call the dependence of moral responsibility on the PAP into question. It seems, however, that the Frankfurt-style approach against the indirect argument suffers from being ambiguous in the status of the intervener. It is also incapable of explaining the significance and function of alternative possibility. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:26:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d0e1df3ecc514b24aa25e29f46a4c849 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2228-6578 2228-6586 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T14:26:34Z |
publishDate | 2017-04-01 |
publisher | Imam Sadiq University |
record_format | Article |
series | پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین |
spelling | doaj.art-d0e1df3ecc514b24aa25e29f46a4c8492024-03-06T08:03:09ZfasImam Sadiq Universityپژوهشنامه فلسفه دین2228-65782228-65862017-04-01151557610.30497/prr.2017.19651965Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence ArgumentJavad Danesh0Assistant professor at Islamic Sciences and Culture Academy, Qom, IranThe different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alternative possibilities, while (2) every type of human free will and moral responsibility is based on such an alternative possibility to be capable of being chosen. Agreeing with the incompatibility of causal determination and the principle of alternative possibilities (PAP), Frankfurt tries to call the dependence of moral responsibility on the PAP into question. It seems, however, that the Frankfurt-style approach against the indirect argument suffers from being ambiguous in the status of the intervener. It is also incapable of explaining the significance and function of alternative possibility.https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdfindirect argumentmoral responsibilitythe principle of alternative possibilitiesfrankfurtvan inwagen |
spellingShingle | Javad Danesh Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین indirect argument moral responsibility the principle of alternative possibilities frankfurt van inwagen |
title | Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument |
title_full | Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument |
title_short | Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument |
title_sort | evaluation of frankfurt s viewpoint in the face of indirect consequence argument |
topic | indirect argument moral responsibility the principle of alternative possibilities frankfurt van inwagen |
url | https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT javaddanesh evaluationoffrankfurtsviewpointinthefaceofindirectconsequenceargument |