Evaluation of Frankfurt's Viewpoint in the Face of Indirect Consequence Argument
The different versions of van Inwagen’s indirect argument for the incompatibility of causal determinism and moral responsibility asserts that (1) the causal necessity and determination indicates that human actions are the results of past events and the laws of nature and thus does not have any alter...
Main Author: | Javad Danesh |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Imam Sadiq University
2017-04-01
|
Series: | پژوهشنامه فلسفه دین |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://prrj.isu.ac.ir/article_1965_aa35315d873ba5eda95aca9d1bf02e5f.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Divine Foreknowledge and Human Moral Responsibility (In Defense of Muslim Philosophers’ Approach)
by: توکل کوهی گیگلو, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Book Review: van Inwagen, Peter. Thinking about Free Will. (Cambridge University Press, 2017, 232 pages.)
by: PEDRO MERLUSSI
Published: (2019-04-01) -
The Flicker of Freedom in Defense of the Principle of Alternative Possibilities
by: Javad Danesh, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
Van Inwagen's Modal Skepticism and The Scope of Modal knowledge
by: Masoud Zia Ali Nasab Pour
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Free Will and Moral Responsibility in Islamic Philosophy
by: Javad Danesh
Published: (2019-06-01)