The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena
Background Health apps are a booming, yet under-regulated market, with potential consumer harms in privacy and health safety. Regulation of the health app market tends to be siloed, with no single sector holding comprehensive oversight. We sought to explore this phenomenon by critically analysing h...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kerman University of Medical Sciences
2019-03-01
|
| Series: | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3576_c193c1581dab865d02c2b0ff2e863a45.pdf |
| _version_ | 1819111321698828288 |
|---|---|
| author | Lisa Parker Lisa Bero Donna Gillies Melissa Raven Quinn Grundy |
| author_facet | Lisa Parker Lisa Bero Donna Gillies Melissa Raven Quinn Grundy |
| author_sort | Lisa Parker |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Background
Health apps are a booming, yet under-regulated market, with potential consumer harms in privacy and health safety. Regulation of the health app market tends to be siloed, with no single sector holding comprehensive oversight. We sought to explore this phenomenon by critically analysing how the problem of health app regulation is being presented and addressed in the policy arena.
Methods
We conducted a critical, qualitative case study of regulation of the Australian mental health app market. We purposively sampled influential policies from government, industry and non-profit organisations that provided oversight of app development, distribution or selection for use. We used Bacchi’s critical, theoretical approach to policy analysis, analysing policy solutions in relation to the ways the underlying problem was presented and discussed. We analysed the ways that policies characterised key stakeholder groups and the rationale policy authors provided for various mechanisms of health app oversight.
Results
We identified and analysed 29 policies from Australia and beyond, spanning 5 sectors: medical device, privacy, advertising, finance, and digital content. Policy authors predominantly framed the problem as potential loss of commercial reputations and profits, rather than consumer protection. Policy solutions assigned main responsibility for app oversight to the public, with a heavy onus on consumers to select safe and high-quality apps. Commercial actors, including powerful app distributors and commercial third parties were rarely subjects of policy initiatives, despite having considerable power to affect app user outcomes.
Conclusion
A stronger regulatory focus on app distributors and commercial partners may improve consumer privacy and safety. Policy-makers in different sectors should work together to develop an overarching regulatory framework for health apps, with a focus on consumer protection. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:55:46Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d0e3bacb739842bfb445125e6a78ada4 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2322-5939 2322-5939 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-22T03:55:46Z |
| publishDate | 2019-03-01 |
| publisher | Kerman University of Medical Sciences |
| record_format | Article |
| series | International Journal of Health Policy and Management |
| spelling | doaj.art-d0e3bacb739842bfb445125e6a78ada42022-12-21T18:39:52ZengKerman University of Medical SciencesInternational Journal of Health Policy and Management2322-59392322-59392019-03-018316817610.15171/IJHPM.2018.117The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy ArenaLisa Parker0Lisa Bero1Donna Gillies2Melissa Raven3Quinn Grundy4Charles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, NSW, Sydney, AustraliaCharles Perkins Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health School of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, NSW, Sydney, AustraliaNDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, Penrith, NSW, AustraliaCritical and Ethical Mental Health Research Group, Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, AustraliaFaculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, CanadaBackground Health apps are a booming, yet under-regulated market, with potential consumer harms in privacy and health safety. Regulation of the health app market tends to be siloed, with no single sector holding comprehensive oversight. We sought to explore this phenomenon by critically analysing how the problem of health app regulation is being presented and addressed in the policy arena. Methods We conducted a critical, qualitative case study of regulation of the Australian mental health app market. We purposively sampled influential policies from government, industry and non-profit organisations that provided oversight of app development, distribution or selection for use. We used Bacchi’s critical, theoretical approach to policy analysis, analysing policy solutions in relation to the ways the underlying problem was presented and discussed. We analysed the ways that policies characterised key stakeholder groups and the rationale policy authors provided for various mechanisms of health app oversight. Results We identified and analysed 29 policies from Australia and beyond, spanning 5 sectors: medical device, privacy, advertising, finance, and digital content. Policy authors predominantly framed the problem as potential loss of commercial reputations and profits, rather than consumer protection. Policy solutions assigned main responsibility for app oversight to the public, with a heavy onus on consumers to select safe and high-quality apps. Commercial actors, including powerful app distributors and commercial third parties were rarely subjects of policy initiatives, despite having considerable power to affect app user outcomes. Conclusion A stronger regulatory focus on app distributors and commercial partners may improve consumer privacy and safety. Policy-makers in different sectors should work together to develop an overarching regulatory framework for health apps, with a focus on consumer protection.http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3576_c193c1581dab865d02c2b0ff2e863a45.pdfmobile applicationsmhealthregulationpolicy analysismental healthaustralia |
| spellingShingle | Lisa Parker Lisa Bero Donna Gillies Melissa Raven Quinn Grundy The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena International Journal of Health Policy and Management mobile applications mhealth regulation policy analysis mental health australia |
| title | The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena |
| title_full | The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena |
| title_fullStr | The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena |
| title_full_unstemmed | The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena |
| title_short | The “Hot Potato” of Mental Health App Regulation: A Critical Case Study of the Australian Policy Arena |
| title_sort | hot potato of mental health app regulation a critical case study of the australian policy arena |
| topic | mobile applications mhealth regulation policy analysis mental health australia |
| url | http://www.ijhpm.com/article_3576_c193c1581dab865d02c2b0ff2e863a45.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lisaparker thehotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT lisabero thehotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT donnagillies thehotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT melissaraven thehotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT quinngrundy thehotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT lisaparker hotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT lisabero hotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT donnagillies hotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT melissaraven hotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena AT quinngrundy hotpotatoofmentalhealthappregulationacriticalcasestudyoftheaustralianpolicyarena |