REPLY TO “COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?”
Abstract Sign-based semantics and embodied semantics are argued to be mutually beneficial to one another. However, while the body does shape our cognitive activities to a great extent, this does not entail that cognition can be reduced to sensorimotor simulation, i.e that the mind can be reduced to...
Main Author: | PATRICK DUFFLEY |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universidade Estadual de Campinas
2022-03-01
|
Series: | Manuscrito |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-60452022000100145&lng=en&tlng=en |
Similar Items
-
COULD SIGN-BASED SEMANTICS AND EMBODIED SEMANTICS BENEFIT ONE ANOTHER?
by: CESAR FERNANDO MEURER
Published: (2022-03-01) -
REPLY TO “PREDICTIVE PROCESSING AND THE SEMIOLOGICAL PRINCIPLE: COMMENTARY TO DUFFLEY”
by: PATRICK DUFFLEY
Published: (2022-03-01) -
The body and the fading away of abstract concepts and words: a sign language analysis
by: Anna M Borghi, et al.
Published: (2014-07-01) -
Embodiment in Irish Sign Language Passives
by: Lorraine Mary Leeson, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
REPLY TO “LINGUISTIC MEANINGS MEET LINGUISTIC FORM”
by: PATRICK DUFFLEY
Published: (2022-03-01)