Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onset...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhou Zhou, Xiaogai Li, Yuzhe Liu, Warren N. Hardy, Svein Kleiven
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-01-01
Series:Brain Multiphysics
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522023000114
_version_ 1797801734113853440
author Zhou Zhou
Xiaogai Li
Yuzhe Liu
Warren N. Hardy
Svein Kleiven
author_facet Zhou Zhou
Xiaogai Li
Yuzhe Liu
Warren N. Hardy
Svein Kleiven
author_sort Zhou Zhou
collection DOAJ
description Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onsets. With respect to the flourishment of strain-based investigation, ambiguity and inconsistency are noted in the scheme for strain rate calculation within the TBI research community. Furthermore, there is no experimental data that can be used to validate the strain rate responses of finite element (FE) models of the human brain. The current work presented a theoretical clarification of two commonly used strain rate computational schemes: the strain rate was either calculated as the time derivative of strain or derived from the rate of deformation tensor. To further substantiate the theoretical disparity, these two schemes were respectively implemented to estimate the strain rate responses from a previous-published cadaveric experiment and an FE head model secondary to a concussive impact. The results clearly showed scheme-dependent responses, both in the experimentally determined principal strain rate and model-derived principal and tract-oriented strain rates. The results highlight that cross-scheme comparison of strain rate responses is inappropriate, and the utilized strain rate computational scheme needs to be reported in future studies. The newly calculated experimental strain rate curves in the supplementary material can be used for strain rate validation of FE head models.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T04:54:59Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d0e938baea2c47b8815524f69f9f4962
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2666-5220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T04:54:59Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Brain Multiphysics
spelling doaj.art-d0e938baea2c47b8815524f69f9f49622023-06-18T05:03:25ZengElsevierBrain Multiphysics2666-52202023-01-014100073Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validationZhou Zhou0Xiaogai Li1Yuzhe Liu2Warren N. Hardy3Svein Kleiven4Neuronic Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 14152, Sweden; Corresponding author.Neuronic Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 14152, SwedenDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, United States of America; School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100083, ChinaVirginia Tech-Wake Forest Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, United States of AmericaNeuronic Engineering, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, 14152, SwedenTraumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alarming global public health issue with high morbidity and mortality rates. Although the causal link between external insults and consequent brain injury remains largely elusive, both strain and strain rate are generally recognized as crucial factors for TBI onsets. With respect to the flourishment of strain-based investigation, ambiguity and inconsistency are noted in the scheme for strain rate calculation within the TBI research community. Furthermore, there is no experimental data that can be used to validate the strain rate responses of finite element (FE) models of the human brain. The current work presented a theoretical clarification of two commonly used strain rate computational schemes: the strain rate was either calculated as the time derivative of strain or derived from the rate of deformation tensor. To further substantiate the theoretical disparity, these two schemes were respectively implemented to estimate the strain rate responses from a previous-published cadaveric experiment and an FE head model secondary to a concussive impact. The results clearly showed scheme-dependent responses, both in the experimentally determined principal strain rate and model-derived principal and tract-oriented strain rates. The results highlight that cross-scheme comparison of strain rate responses is inappropriate, and the utilized strain rate computational scheme needs to be reported in future studies. The newly calculated experimental strain rate curves in the supplementary material can be used for strain rate validation of FE head models.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522023000114Traumatic brain injuryTime derivative of strainRate of deformation tensorStrain rate validation
spellingShingle Zhou Zhou
Xiaogai Li
Yuzhe Liu
Warren N. Hardy
Svein Kleiven
Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
Brain Multiphysics
Traumatic brain injury
Time derivative of strain
Rate of deformation tensor
Strain rate validation
title Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
title_full Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
title_fullStr Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
title_full_unstemmed Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
title_short Brain strain rate response: Addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
title_sort brain strain rate response addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
topic Traumatic brain injury
Time derivative of strain
Rate of deformation tensor
Strain rate validation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666522023000114
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouzhou brainstrainrateresponseaddressingcomputationalambiguityandexperimentaldataformodelvalidation
AT xiaogaili brainstrainrateresponseaddressingcomputationalambiguityandexperimentaldataformodelvalidation
AT yuzheliu brainstrainrateresponseaddressingcomputationalambiguityandexperimentaldataformodelvalidation
AT warrennhardy brainstrainrateresponseaddressingcomputationalambiguityandexperimentaldataformodelvalidation
AT sveinkleiven brainstrainrateresponseaddressingcomputationalambiguityandexperimentaldataformodelvalidation