Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study
Introduction: Mandibular angle fracture is common in road traffic accidents. This study was conducted to compare 3D miniplate system with 2D plates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 120 patients with mandibular angle fracture of both gende...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2020;volume=31;issue=1;spage=134;epage=137;aulast=Singh |
_version_ | 1828412906237067264 |
---|---|
author | Rohit Singh Konark Anju Singh D K Singh Jazib Nazeer Supriya Singh |
author_facet | Rohit Singh Konark Anju Singh D K Singh Jazib Nazeer Supriya Singh |
author_sort | Rohit Singh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: Mandibular angle fracture is common in road traffic accidents. This study was conducted to compare 3D miniplate system with 2D plates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 120 patients with mandibular angle fracture of both genders. After selecting patients, patients were divided into 2 groups of 60 each. In group I, patients were treated with 3D, 2.0-mm titanium plates, and in group II, patients were treated with 2D, 2.0-mm titanium miniplate in mandibular angle fracture. Patients were evaluated regularly after 1, 3, and 6 months for outcome of treatment. Results: In group I, males were 22 and females were 38. In group II, males were 40 and females were 20. Right angle fracture was seen in 32 patients in group I and 26 in group II. Left angle fracture was seen in 24 in group I and 28 in group II. Right angle and left parasymphysis fracture was seen in 3 in group I and 4 in group II. Left angle and right parasymphysis fracture was seen in 1 in group I and 2 in group II. [Table 3], [Graph 1] shows that in group I, after 1 month sensory deficit was present in 5 patients and in group II in 12 patients. After 3 months, there were no patients with sensory deficit in group I and 2 in group II. Preoperatively in group I, mouth opening was 24 mm and in group II patients was 25.80 mm, which increased to 31.20 mm in group I and 28.20 mm in group II at 1 month, 32 mm in group I and 30 mm in group II at 3 months, and 37.20 and 32.12 mm in groups I and II, respectively, at 6 months. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: 3D miniplate system is reliable and effective treatment modality for mandibular angle fractures as compared with traditional 2D miniplates.[INLINE:1] |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T12:57:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d103e396751d49c1b973debd9ac87885 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0970-9290 1998-3603 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T12:57:37Z |
publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
record_format | Article |
series | Indian Journal of Dental Research |
spelling | doaj.art-d103e396751d49c1b973debd9ac878852022-12-22T01:48:03ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Dental Research0970-92901998-36032020-01-0131113413710.4103/ijdr.IJDR_885_19Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical studyRohit SinghKonarkAnju SinghD K SinghJazib NazeerSupriya SinghIntroduction: Mandibular angle fracture is common in road traffic accidents. This study was conducted to compare 3D miniplate system with 2D plates for treatment of mandibular angle fractures. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted on 120 patients with mandibular angle fracture of both genders. After selecting patients, patients were divided into 2 groups of 60 each. In group I, patients were treated with 3D, 2.0-mm titanium plates, and in group II, patients were treated with 2D, 2.0-mm titanium miniplate in mandibular angle fracture. Patients were evaluated regularly after 1, 3, and 6 months for outcome of treatment. Results: In group I, males were 22 and females were 38. In group II, males were 40 and females were 20. Right angle fracture was seen in 32 patients in group I and 26 in group II. Left angle fracture was seen in 24 in group I and 28 in group II. Right angle and left parasymphysis fracture was seen in 3 in group I and 4 in group II. Left angle and right parasymphysis fracture was seen in 1 in group I and 2 in group II. [Table 3], [Graph 1] shows that in group I, after 1 month sensory deficit was present in 5 patients and in group II in 12 patients. After 3 months, there were no patients with sensory deficit in group I and 2 in group II. Preoperatively in group I, mouth opening was 24 mm and in group II patients was 25.80 mm, which increased to 31.20 mm in group I and 28.20 mm in group II at 1 month, 32 mm in group I and 30 mm in group II at 3 months, and 37.20 and 32.12 mm in groups I and II, respectively, at 6 months. The difference was significant (P < 0.05). Conclusion: 3D miniplate system is reliable and effective treatment modality for mandibular angle fractures as compared with traditional 2D miniplates.[INLINE:1]http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2020;volume=31;issue=1;spage=134;epage=137;aulast=Singhmandibular angleminiplatestitanium |
spellingShingle | Rohit Singh Konark Anju Singh D K Singh Jazib Nazeer Supriya Singh Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study Indian Journal of Dental Research mandibular angle miniplates titanium |
title | Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study |
title_full | Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study |
title_fullStr | Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study |
title_short | Comparative evaluation of 2D miniplates and 3D miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture - A clinical study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of 2d miniplates and 3d miniplates fixation in mandibular angle fracture a clinical study |
topic | mandibular angle miniplates titanium |
url | http://www.ijdr.in/article.asp?issn=0970-9290;year=2020;volume=31;issue=1;spage=134;epage=137;aulast=Singh |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rohitsingh comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy AT konark comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy AT anjusingh comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy AT dksingh comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy AT jazibnazeer comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy AT supriyasingh comparativeevaluationof2dminiplatesand3dminiplatesfixationinmandibularanglefractureaclinicalstudy |