1969, un año inexistente
The proposal to study one year, as an arbitrary unit that allows us to observe a series of literary and cultural phenomena, is both an excellent hermeneutic option, and a gesture that intensifies the paradoxes inherent to the historicity of artistic production. Actually, if we unpack the components...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Réseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la Plata
|
| Series: | Cuadernos LIRICO |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/2697 |
| _version_ | 1797310747850571776 |
|---|---|
| author | Julio Premat |
| author_facet | Julio Premat |
| author_sort | Julio Premat |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The proposal to study one year, as an arbitrary unit that allows us to observe a series of literary and cultural phenomena, is both an excellent hermeneutic option, and a gesture that intensifies the paradoxes inherent to the historicity of artistic production. Actually, if we unpack the components of this supposed unit, we find a dizzying variety of things that remind us that the times of literature are multiple, contradictory and unstable. Anachronism, the simultaneity of different practices, the radical oppositions between certain aesthetic choices, and the different ways of integrating tradition and establishing relations with the present, weaken the possibility of finding synthetic and panoramic synchrony.In this article, instead of analyzing the plurality of that year of ’69, which is to say the observable contents in a given temporal period, I will focus on conceptions of literary history that might be mobilized to study a phenomenon of that kind. That is to say, I will take advantage of the example to ask certain questions about the axial dates that establish and demarcate, about ideas of periodization, nominalism, and national segmentation within the chronological organization of literary production. In contrast to certain logical figures of criticism, I also highlight the specific temporality of works and the modalities of one thought process of writers about their incorporation into the literary future. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T01:47:30Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d10df0d360244165bfcb4c11fc1c59b9 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2262-8339 |
| language | Spanish |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T01:47:30Z |
| publisher | Réseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la Plata |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cuadernos LIRICO |
| spelling | doaj.art-d10df0d360244165bfcb4c11fc1c59b92024-02-14T12:57:28ZspaRéseau Interuniversitaire d'Ètude des Littératures Contemporaines du Río de la PlataCuadernos LIRICO2262-83391510.4000/lirico.26971969, un año inexistenteJulio PrematThe proposal to study one year, as an arbitrary unit that allows us to observe a series of literary and cultural phenomena, is both an excellent hermeneutic option, and a gesture that intensifies the paradoxes inherent to the historicity of artistic production. Actually, if we unpack the components of this supposed unit, we find a dizzying variety of things that remind us that the times of literature are multiple, contradictory and unstable. Anachronism, the simultaneity of different practices, the radical oppositions between certain aesthetic choices, and the different ways of integrating tradition and establishing relations with the present, weaken the possibility of finding synthetic and panoramic synchrony.In this article, instead of analyzing the plurality of that year of ’69, which is to say the observable contents in a given temporal period, I will focus on conceptions of literary history that might be mobilized to study a phenomenon of that kind. That is to say, I will take advantage of the example to ask certain questions about the axial dates that establish and demarcate, about ideas of periodization, nominalism, and national segmentation within the chronological organization of literary production. In contrast to certain logical figures of criticism, I also highlight the specific temporality of works and the modalities of one thought process of writers about their incorporation into the literary future.https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/2697literary historytemporal imaginariesperiodization. |
| spellingShingle | Julio Premat 1969, un año inexistente Cuadernos LIRICO literary history temporal imaginaries periodization. |
| title | 1969, un año inexistente |
| title_full | 1969, un año inexistente |
| title_fullStr | 1969, un año inexistente |
| title_full_unstemmed | 1969, un año inexistente |
| title_short | 1969, un año inexistente |
| title_sort | 1969 un ano inexistente |
| topic | literary history temporal imaginaries periodization. |
| url | https://journals.openedition.org/lirico/2697 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT juliopremat 1969unanoinexistente |