Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric

When solving the problem of the minimum cost consensus with asymmetric adjustment costs, decision makers need to face various uncertain situations (such as individual opinions and unit adjustment costs for opinion modifications in the up and down directions). However, in the existing methods for dea...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ziqi Wu, Kai Zhu, Shaojian Qu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-11-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4312
_version_ 1797464651388157952
author Ziqi Wu
Kai Zhu
Shaojian Qu
author_facet Ziqi Wu
Kai Zhu
Shaojian Qu
author_sort Ziqi Wu
collection DOAJ
description When solving the problem of the minimum cost consensus with asymmetric adjustment costs, decision makers need to face various uncertain situations (such as individual opinions and unit adjustment costs for opinion modifications in the up and down directions). However, in the existing methods for dealing with this problem, robust optimization will lead to overly conservative results, and stochastic programming needs to know the exact probability distribution. In order to overcome these shortcomings, it is essential to develop a novelty consensus model. Thus, we propose three new minimum-cost consensus models with a distributionally robust method. Uncertain parameters (individual opinions, unit adjustment costs for opinion modifications in the up and down directions, the degree of tolerance, and the range of thresholds) were investigated by modeling the three new models, respectively. In the distributionally robust method, the construction of an ambiguous set is very important. Based on the historical data information, we chose the Wasserstein ambiguous set with the Wasserstein distance in this study. Then, three new models were transformed into a second-order cone programming problem to simplify the calculations. Further, a case from the EU Trade and Animal Welfare (TAW) program policy consultation was used to verify the practicability of the proposed models. Through comparison and sensitivity analysis, the numerical results showed that the three new models fit the complex decision environment better.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T18:11:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d115525edefc47e4ac8d196e5f7d667e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T18:11:14Z
publishDate 2022-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-d115525edefc47e4ac8d196e5f7d667e2023-11-24T09:09:37ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902022-11-011022431210.3390/math10224312Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein MetricZiqi Wu0Kai Zhu1Shaojian Qu2Alibaba, Hangzhou 311121, ChinaBusiness School, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, ChinaSchool of Management Science and Technology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210000, ChinaWhen solving the problem of the minimum cost consensus with asymmetric adjustment costs, decision makers need to face various uncertain situations (such as individual opinions and unit adjustment costs for opinion modifications in the up and down directions). However, in the existing methods for dealing with this problem, robust optimization will lead to overly conservative results, and stochastic programming needs to know the exact probability distribution. In order to overcome these shortcomings, it is essential to develop a novelty consensus model. Thus, we propose three new minimum-cost consensus models with a distributionally robust method. Uncertain parameters (individual opinions, unit adjustment costs for opinion modifications in the up and down directions, the degree of tolerance, and the range of thresholds) were investigated by modeling the three new models, respectively. In the distributionally robust method, the construction of an ambiguous set is very important. Based on the historical data information, we chose the Wasserstein ambiguous set with the Wasserstein distance in this study. Then, three new models were transformed into a second-order cone programming problem to simplify the calculations. Further, a case from the EU Trade and Animal Welfare (TAW) program policy consultation was used to verify the practicability of the proposed models. Through comparison and sensitivity analysis, the numerical results showed that the three new models fit the complex decision environment better.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4312distributionally robust optimizationgroup decision-makingminimum cost consensusasymmetric adjustment costsWasserstein distance
spellingShingle Ziqi Wu
Kai Zhu
Shaojian Qu
Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
Mathematics
distributionally robust optimization
group decision-making
minimum cost consensus
asymmetric adjustment costs
Wasserstein distance
title Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
title_full Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
title_fullStr Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
title_full_unstemmed Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
title_short Distributionally Robust Optimization Model for a Minimum Cost Consensus with Asymmetric Adjustment Costs Based on the Wasserstein Metric
title_sort distributionally robust optimization model for a minimum cost consensus with asymmetric adjustment costs based on the wasserstein metric
topic distributionally robust optimization
group decision-making
minimum cost consensus
asymmetric adjustment costs
Wasserstein distance
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/10/22/4312
work_keys_str_mv AT ziqiwu distributionallyrobustoptimizationmodelforaminimumcostconsensuswithasymmetricadjustmentcostsbasedonthewassersteinmetric
AT kaizhu distributionallyrobustoptimizationmodelforaminimumcostconsensuswithasymmetricadjustmentcostsbasedonthewassersteinmetric
AT shaojianqu distributionallyrobustoptimizationmodelforaminimumcostconsensuswithasymmetricadjustmentcostsbasedonthewassersteinmetric