Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT

Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, causes joint destruction, and leads to physical disability. Advances in the treatment of RA, such as biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), have provided better clinical outcomes, includ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Naoki Iwamoto, Shuntaro Sato, Remi Sumiyoshi, Ko Chiba, Nanami Miyamoto, Kumiko Arinaga, Makiko Kobayashi, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Makoto Osaki, Atsushi Kawakami
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-08-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3589-8
_version_ 1811322692173824000
author Naoki Iwamoto
Shuntaro Sato
Remi Sumiyoshi
Ko Chiba
Nanami Miyamoto
Kumiko Arinaga
Makiko Kobayashi
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Makoto Osaki
Atsushi Kawakami
author_facet Naoki Iwamoto
Shuntaro Sato
Remi Sumiyoshi
Ko Chiba
Nanami Miyamoto
Kumiko Arinaga
Makiko Kobayashi
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Makoto Osaki
Atsushi Kawakami
author_sort Naoki Iwamoto
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, causes joint destruction, and leads to physical disability. Advances in the treatment of RA, such as biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), have provided better clinical outcomes, including the achievement of remission for patients with RA, but some patients cannot receive these treatments because of their side effects and high cost, and not all patients achieve remission. Although the efficacy of denosumab, which is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody with a high affinity for the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), in the treatment of RA has been reported in clinical trials, the efficacy of denosumab in both preventing joint destruction and improving disease activity has not been evaluated in a real-world setting. Methods/design This open-label, randomized, parallel-group study will compare the continued use of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) alone with the combined use of csDMARDs and denosumab in patients whose RA is treated with csDMARDs. In total, 44 patients with RA will be randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with denosumab or to continue RA treatment without additional denosumab. The duration of the intervention will be 12 months. To analyze bone erosion and bone micro-architecture precisely, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) will be performed every 6 months. The primary endpoint is changes in the depth of bone erosion as measured by HR-pQCT from baseline to 6 months. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from baseline in the width and volume of bone erosion as measured by HR-pQCT and changes from baseline in the depth of bone erosion at 12 months. Changes in bone micro-architecture will also be analyzed as an exploratory endpoint. Discussion The results of this study are expected to provide strong evidence regarding the usefulness of denosumab for the treatment of RA. Moreover, by using HR-pQCT, this study will also reveal the effect of denosumab not only on bone erosion but also on bone micro-architecture. Trial registration This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000030575 on December 26, 2017.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T13:40:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d11b28ac95ff439b90cd468e6be4045f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T13:40:36Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-d11b28ac95ff439b90cd468e6be4045f2022-12-22T02:44:39ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-08-012011810.1186/s13063-019-3589-8Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCTNaoki Iwamoto0Shuntaro Sato1Remi Sumiyoshi2Ko Chiba3Nanami Miyamoto4Kumiko Arinaga5Makiko Kobayashi6Hiroshi Yamamoto7Makoto Osaki8Atsushi Kawakami9Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki University Hospital, Clinical Research CenterDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesNagasaki University Hospital, Clinical Research CenterNagasaki University Hospital, Clinical Research CenterMedical Science Department, Daiichi Sankyo Co., LtdNagasaki University Hospital, Clinical Research CenterDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesDepartment of Immunology and Rheumatology, Division of Advanced Preventive Medical Sciences, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesAbstract Background Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the joints, causes joint destruction, and leads to physical disability. Advances in the treatment of RA, such as biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs), have provided better clinical outcomes, including the achievement of remission for patients with RA, but some patients cannot receive these treatments because of their side effects and high cost, and not all patients achieve remission. Although the efficacy of denosumab, which is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody with a high affinity for the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B (RANK) ligand (RANKL), in the treatment of RA has been reported in clinical trials, the efficacy of denosumab in both preventing joint destruction and improving disease activity has not been evaluated in a real-world setting. Methods/design This open-label, randomized, parallel-group study will compare the continued use of conventional synthetic DMARDs (csDMARDs) alone with the combined use of csDMARDs and denosumab in patients whose RA is treated with csDMARDs. In total, 44 patients with RA will be randomly assigned to receive additional treatment with denosumab or to continue RA treatment without additional denosumab. The duration of the intervention will be 12 months. To analyze bone erosion and bone micro-architecture precisely, high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) will be performed every 6 months. The primary endpoint is changes in the depth of bone erosion as measured by HR-pQCT from baseline to 6 months. Important secondary endpoints are the changes from baseline in the width and volume of bone erosion as measured by HR-pQCT and changes from baseline in the depth of bone erosion at 12 months. Changes in bone micro-architecture will also be analyzed as an exploratory endpoint. Discussion The results of this study are expected to provide strong evidence regarding the usefulness of denosumab for the treatment of RA. Moreover, by using HR-pQCT, this study will also reveal the effect of denosumab not only on bone erosion but also on bone micro-architecture. Trial registration This study was registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000030575 on December 26, 2017.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3589-8Rheumatoid arthritisRANKLDenosumabBone erosionBone micro-architectureHR-pQCT
spellingShingle Naoki Iwamoto
Shuntaro Sato
Remi Sumiyoshi
Ko Chiba
Nanami Miyamoto
Kumiko Arinaga
Makiko Kobayashi
Hiroshi Yamamoto
Makoto Osaki
Atsushi Kawakami
Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
Trials
Rheumatoid arthritis
RANKL
Denosumab
Bone erosion
Bone micro-architecture
HR-pQCT
title Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
title_full Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
title_fullStr Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
title_short Comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients: study protocol for an open-label randomized controlled trial by HR-pQCT
title_sort comparative study of the inhibitory effect on bone erosion progression with denosumab treatment and conventional treatment in rheumatoid arthritis patients study protocol for an open label randomized controlled trial by hr pqct
topic Rheumatoid arthritis
RANKL
Denosumab
Bone erosion
Bone micro-architecture
HR-pQCT
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3589-8
work_keys_str_mv AT naokiiwamoto comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT shuntarosato comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT remisumiyoshi comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT kochiba comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT nanamimiyamoto comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT kumikoarinaga comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT makikokobayashi comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT hiroshiyamamoto comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT makotoosaki comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct
AT atsushikawakami comparativestudyoftheinhibitoryeffectonboneerosionprogressionwithdenosumabtreatmentandconventionaltreatmentinrheumatoidarthritispatientsstudyprotocolforanopenlabelrandomizedcontrolledtrialbyhrpqct