A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction.
Learning transfer (i.e. accelerated learning over a series of structurally related learning tasks) differentiates species and age-groups, but the evolutionary and developmental implications of such differences are unclear. To this end, the relational schema induction paradigm employing tasks that sh...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS Computational Biology |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008641 |
_version_ | 1818927016569733120 |
---|---|
author | Steven Phillips |
author_facet | Steven Phillips |
author_sort | Steven Phillips |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Learning transfer (i.e. accelerated learning over a series of structurally related learning tasks) differentiates species and age-groups, but the evolutionary and developmental implications of such differences are unclear. To this end, the relational schema induction paradigm employing tasks that share algebraic (group-like) structures was introduced to contrast stimulus-independent (relational) versus stimulus-dependent (associative) learning processes. However, a theory explaining this kind of relational learning transfer has not been forthcoming beyond a general appeal to some form of structure-mapping, as typically assumed in models of analogy. In this paper, we provide a theory of relational schema induction as a "reconstruction" process: the algebraic structure underlying transfer is reconstructed by comparing stimulus relations, learned within each task, for structural consistency across tasks-formally, the theory derives from a category theory version of Tannakian reconstruction. The theory also applies to non-human studies of relational concepts, thereby placing human and non-human transfer on common ground for sharper comparison and contrast. As the theory and paradigm do not depend on linguistic ability, we also have a way for pinpointing where aspects of human learning diverge from other species without begging the question of language. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:06:19Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d12589e155364e17ac932f58ca82fdce |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1553-734X 1553-7358 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-20T03:06:19Z |
publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS Computational Biology |
spelling | doaj.art-d12589e155364e17ac932f58ca82fdce2022-12-21T19:55:36ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582021-01-01171e100864110.1371/journal.pcbi.1008641A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction.Steven PhillipsLearning transfer (i.e. accelerated learning over a series of structurally related learning tasks) differentiates species and age-groups, but the evolutionary and developmental implications of such differences are unclear. To this end, the relational schema induction paradigm employing tasks that share algebraic (group-like) structures was introduced to contrast stimulus-independent (relational) versus stimulus-dependent (associative) learning processes. However, a theory explaining this kind of relational learning transfer has not been forthcoming beyond a general appeal to some form of structure-mapping, as typically assumed in models of analogy. In this paper, we provide a theory of relational schema induction as a "reconstruction" process: the algebraic structure underlying transfer is reconstructed by comparing stimulus relations, learned within each task, for structural consistency across tasks-formally, the theory derives from a category theory version of Tannakian reconstruction. The theory also applies to non-human studies of relational concepts, thereby placing human and non-human transfer on common ground for sharper comparison and contrast. As the theory and paradigm do not depend on linguistic ability, we also have a way for pinpointing where aspects of human learning diverge from other species without begging the question of language.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008641 |
spellingShingle | Steven Phillips A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. PLoS Computational Biology |
title | A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. |
title_full | A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. |
title_fullStr | A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. |
title_full_unstemmed | A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. |
title_short | A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction. |
title_sort | reconstruction theory of relational schema induction |
url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stevenphillips areconstructiontheoryofrelationalschemainduction AT stevenphillips reconstructiontheoryofrelationalschemainduction |