Protocol registration improves reporting quality of systematic reviews in dentistry
Abstract Background The aims of this study were to assess whether the previous registration of a systematic review (SR) is associated with the improvement of the quality of the report of SRs and whether SR registration reduced outcome reporting bias. Methods We performed a search in PubMed for SRs i...
Main Authors: | Mateus Bertolini Fernandes dos Santos, Bernardo Antônio Agostini, Rafaela Bassani, Gabriel Kalil Rocha Pereira, Rafael Sarkis-Onofre |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-03-01
|
Series: | BMC Medical Research Methodology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12874-020-00939-7 |
Similar Items
-
Characteristics of systematic reviews published in dentistry by Brazilian corresponding authors
by: Rafael Sarkis-Onofre, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
A systematic review of comparisons between protocols or registrations and full reports in primary biomedical research
by: Guowei Li, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01) -
Assessing the magnitude of changes from protocol to publication—a survey on Cochrane and non-Cochrane Systematic Reviews
by: Maximilian Siebert, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01) -
How are meta-analyses being conducted and reported in dentistry?
by: Leticia Tainá de Oliveira Lemes, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01) -
A systematic review of the processes used to link clinical trial registrations to their published results
by: Rabia Bashir, et al.
Published: (2017-07-01)