Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz

New wireless technologies significantly utilize the spectrum around 6 GHz with some of them, like Wi-Fi®6E, using both the spectrum below and above 6 GHz. At these frequencies, the main challenge for electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure assessments is due to the exposure metric changing f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Walid El Hajj, John Roman, Zhen Yao, Robert Paxman, Valerio De Santis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IEEE 2023-01-01
Series:IEEE Access
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10159216/
_version_ 1797776959743197184
author Walid El Hajj
John Roman
Zhen Yao
Robert Paxman
Valerio De Santis
author_facet Walid El Hajj
John Roman
Zhen Yao
Robert Paxman
Valerio De Santis
author_sort Walid El Hajj
collection DOAJ
description New wireless technologies significantly utilize the spectrum around 6 GHz with some of them, like Wi-Fi®6E, using both the spectrum below and above 6 GHz. At these frequencies, the main challenge for electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure assessments is due to the exposure metric changing from specific absorption rate (SAR) to absorbed power density (APD). Moreover, due to current measurement limitations, the incident power density (IPD) rather than APD is used in practice. In this context, the maximum allowed output power to ensure exposure compliance is dependent on the metric used and can lead to a discontinuity below and above 6 GHz even for different channels of the same technology. This paper studies such a discontinuity at the transition frequency of 6 GHz using a dipole antenna and a Planar Inverted F Antenna (PIFA). The study was performed at several exposure distances by means of numerical simulations as well as experimental measurements. The assessment was based on the comparison between maximum power values obtained while remaining compliant to the SAR and IPD limits for the same exposure conditions. The results have shown that for a specific source there was a distance (between 5 and 10 mm) where the highest power reduction for compliance switched from SAR to IPD. The difference or discontinuity level varied between 2 and 6 dB depending on the exposure distance and the source. In summary, SAR is more restrictive at closer distances, while the IPD induces a higher back-off power with an increase in distance.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T22:57:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d131a901c24b4d84b125a824f6f953d6
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2169-3536
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T22:57:17Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IEEE
record_format Article
series IEEE Access
spelling doaj.art-d131a901c24b4d84b125a824f6f953d62023-07-19T23:00:20ZengIEEEIEEE Access2169-35362023-01-0111621746217910.1109/ACCESS.2023.328469010159216Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHzWalid El Hajj0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2363-2313John Roman1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7550-6805Zhen Yao2Robert Paxman3https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6225-0558Valerio De Santis4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-744XIntel Corporation, Antibes, FranceIntel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USAIntel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USAIntel Corporation, Hillsboro, OR, USADepartment of Industrial and Information Engineering and Economics, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, ItalyNew wireless technologies significantly utilize the spectrum around 6 GHz with some of them, like Wi-Fi®6E, using both the spectrum below and above 6 GHz. At these frequencies, the main challenge for electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure assessments is due to the exposure metric changing from specific absorption rate (SAR) to absorbed power density (APD). Moreover, due to current measurement limitations, the incident power density (IPD) rather than APD is used in practice. In this context, the maximum allowed output power to ensure exposure compliance is dependent on the metric used and can lead to a discontinuity below and above 6 GHz even for different channels of the same technology. This paper studies such a discontinuity at the transition frequency of 6 GHz using a dipole antenna and a Planar Inverted F Antenna (PIFA). The study was performed at several exposure distances by means of numerical simulations as well as experimental measurements. The assessment was based on the comparison between maximum power values obtained while remaining compliant to the SAR and IPD limits for the same exposure conditions. The results have shown that for a specific source there was a distance (between 5 and 10 mm) where the highest power reduction for compliance switched from SAR to IPD. The difference or discontinuity level varied between 2 and 6 dB depending on the exposure distance and the source. In summary, SAR is more restrictive at closer distances, while the IPD induces a higher back-off power with an increase in distance.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10159216/5Gcompliance assessmentEMF exposureincident power densityspecific absorption ratestandardization
spellingShingle Walid El Hajj
John Roman
Zhen Yao
Robert Paxman
Valerio De Santis
Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
IEEE Access
5G
compliance assessment
EMF exposure
incident power density
specific absorption rate
standardization
title Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
title_full Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
title_fullStr Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
title_full_unstemmed Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
title_short Investigation of Power Levels Related to Different EMF Exposure Metrics at 6 GHz
title_sort investigation of power levels related to different emf exposure metrics at 6 ghz
topic 5G
compliance assessment
EMF exposure
incident power density
specific absorption rate
standardization
url https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10159216/
work_keys_str_mv AT walidelhajj investigationofpowerlevelsrelatedtodifferentemfexposuremetricsat6ghz
AT johnroman investigationofpowerlevelsrelatedtodifferentemfexposuremetricsat6ghz
AT zhenyao investigationofpowerlevelsrelatedtodifferentemfexposuremetricsat6ghz
AT robertpaxman investigationofpowerlevelsrelatedtodifferentemfexposuremetricsat6ghz
AT valeriodesantis investigationofpowerlevelsrelatedtodifferentemfexposuremetricsat6ghz