Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968)
AbstractIn the practice of international journalism, the imagination used by journalists and publishers is helpful for understanding the country, but it also has the drawback of creating a ‘fog’ on the contrary. Mongolia was a mysterious country like an enigma to foreigners. To open it, foreigners w...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2024-12-01
|
| Series: | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2303178 |
| _version_ | 1797351519577702400 |
|---|---|
| author | Amartuvshin Sukhee Tserenjav Tsevegjav |
| author_facet | Amartuvshin Sukhee Tserenjav Tsevegjav |
| author_sort | Amartuvshin Sukhee |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | AbstractIn the practice of international journalism, the imagination used by journalists and publishers is helpful for understanding the country, but it also has the drawback of creating a ‘fog’ on the contrary. Mongolia was a mysterious country like an enigma to foreigners. To open it, foreigners wrote with various ideas. Did their stereotypes succeed? Based on such questionable assumptions, the circle analysis is presented. Stereotypes regarding Mongolia were examined in pieces published in the American Press between 1868 and 1968. To begin, stereotypes were extracted from the texts using content analysis. Second, on the topics of stereotypes, the study has discovered five frames of stereotypes. In the end the study examined the many meanings of stereotypes in frames. Some of these meanings could be the ‘fog’ that is distorting Mongolian understanding. However, other definitions may be more extensive, leading to a better comprehension of Mongolia. To recap all of these misconceptions, publications in the American press revealed admissible information about Mongolia at that time. This validates the five-frame analysis proposed in this study of Mongolian stereotypes in the American press. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:00:43Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d152e745bb304884b1ea4614864daafc |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2331-1983 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T13:00:43Z |
| publishDate | 2024-12-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Cogent Arts & Humanities |
| spelling | doaj.art-d152e745bb304884b1ea4614864daafc2024-01-19T07:16:54ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Arts & Humanities2331-19832024-12-0111110.1080/23311983.2024.2303178Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968)Amartuvshin Sukhee0Tserenjav Tsevegjav1Department of Journalism, School of Social Science and Humanities, MNUE, Ulaanbaatar, MongoliaDepartment of Journalism, School of Social Science and Humanities, MNUE, Ulaanbaatar, MongoliaAbstractIn the practice of international journalism, the imagination used by journalists and publishers is helpful for understanding the country, but it also has the drawback of creating a ‘fog’ on the contrary. Mongolia was a mysterious country like an enigma to foreigners. To open it, foreigners wrote with various ideas. Did their stereotypes succeed? Based on such questionable assumptions, the circle analysis is presented. Stereotypes regarding Mongolia were examined in pieces published in the American Press between 1868 and 1968. To begin, stereotypes were extracted from the texts using content analysis. Second, on the topics of stereotypes, the study has discovered five frames of stereotypes. In the end the study examined the many meanings of stereotypes in frames. Some of these meanings could be the ‘fog’ that is distorting Mongolian understanding. However, other definitions may be more extensive, leading to a better comprehension of Mongolia. To recap all of these misconceptions, publications in the American press revealed admissible information about Mongolia at that time. This validates the five-frame analysis proposed in this study of Mongolian stereotypes in the American press.https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2303178Frame analysisstereotypesimaginationMongoliaAmerican Pressstereotypes about Mongolia’s |
| spellingShingle | Amartuvshin Sukhee Tserenjav Tsevegjav Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) Cogent Arts & Humanities Frame analysis stereotypes imagination Mongolia American Press stereotypes about Mongolia’s |
| title | Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) |
| title_full | Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) |
| title_fullStr | Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) |
| title_full_unstemmed | Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) |
| title_short | Framing studies: stereotypes about Mongolia’s in the American Press (1868–1968) |
| title_sort | framing studies stereotypes about mongolia s in the american press 1868 1968 |
| topic | Frame analysis stereotypes imagination Mongolia American Press stereotypes about Mongolia’s |
| url | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/23311983.2024.2303178 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT amartuvshinsukhee framingstudiesstereotypesaboutmongoliasintheamericanpress18681968 AT tserenjavtsevegjav framingstudiesstereotypesaboutmongoliasintheamericanpress18681968 |