Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome

ObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Malakh Shrestha, Tim Kaufeld, Pamila Shrestha, Andreas Martens, Saad Rustum, Linda Rudolph, Heike Krüger, Morsi Arar, Axel Haverich, Erik Beckmann
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/full
_version_ 1811241552617406464
author Malakh Shrestha
Tim Kaufeld
Pamila Shrestha
Andreas Martens
Saad Rustum
Linda Rudolph
Heike Krüger
Morsi Arar
Axel Haverich
Erik Beckmann
author_facet Malakh Shrestha
Tim Kaufeld
Pamila Shrestha
Andreas Martens
Saad Rustum
Linda Rudolph
Heike Krüger
Morsi Arar
Axel Haverich
Erik Beckmann
author_sort Malakh Shrestha
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019, a total of 732 patients underwent a valve sparing root replacement (David) procedure. Out of these, 220 patients underwent elective David-I procedure (isolated) without any other concomitant procedures at our center. Patients were assigned to either group A (n = 42, mini-access) or group B (n = 178, full sternotomy).ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time were 188.5 ± 35.4 min in group A and 149.0 (135.5–167.5) in group B (p < 0.001). Aortic cross-clamp time were 126.2 ± 27.2 min in group A and 110.0 (97.0–126.0) in group B (p < 0.001). Post-operative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≤ I° in 41 (100%) patients of group A and 155 (95%) of group B. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1) in group A and 0% (n = 0) in group B (p = 0.191). Perioperative stroke occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient of group A and 2 (1.1%) patients of group B (p = 0.483). Reexploration for bleeding was necessary in 4 (9.5%) patients of group A and 7 (3.9%) of group B (p = 0.232). Follow-up was complete for 98% of all patients. The 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-year survival rates were: 97, 97, 97, and 97%, in group A (mini-access) and 99, 96, 95, and 92% in group B (full sternotomy), respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related re-operation at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after initial surgery were: 97, 95, 95, and 84% in group A and 97, 95, 91, and 90% in group B, respectively.ConclusionEarly post-operative results after David procedure via minimally invasive access are comparable to conventional full sternotomy. Meticulous attention to hemostasis is a critical factor during minimally access David procedures. Long-term outcome including the durability of the reimplanted aortic valve seems to be comparable, too.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T13:37:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d17f1289aaad440bad1621d2a139eeaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T13:37:50Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-d17f1289aaad440bad1621d2a139eeaa2022-12-22T03:30:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-10-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.966126966126Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcomeMalakh ShresthaTim KaufeldPamila ShresthaAndreas MartensSaad RustumLinda RudolphHeike KrügerMorsi ArarAxel HaverichErik BeckmannObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019, a total of 732 patients underwent a valve sparing root replacement (David) procedure. Out of these, 220 patients underwent elective David-I procedure (isolated) without any other concomitant procedures at our center. Patients were assigned to either group A (n = 42, mini-access) or group B (n = 178, full sternotomy).ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time were 188.5 ± 35.4 min in group A and 149.0 (135.5–167.5) in group B (p < 0.001). Aortic cross-clamp time were 126.2 ± 27.2 min in group A and 110.0 (97.0–126.0) in group B (p < 0.001). Post-operative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≤ I° in 41 (100%) patients of group A and 155 (95%) of group B. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1) in group A and 0% (n = 0) in group B (p = 0.191). Perioperative stroke occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient of group A and 2 (1.1%) patients of group B (p = 0.483). Reexploration for bleeding was necessary in 4 (9.5%) patients of group A and 7 (3.9%) of group B (p = 0.232). Follow-up was complete for 98% of all patients. The 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-year survival rates were: 97, 97, 97, and 97%, in group A (mini-access) and 99, 96, 95, and 92% in group B (full sternotomy), respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related re-operation at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after initial surgery were: 97, 95, 95, and 84% in group A and 97, 95, 91, and 90% in group B, respectively.ConclusionEarly post-operative results after David procedure via minimally invasive access are comparable to conventional full sternotomy. Meticulous attention to hemostasis is a critical factor during minimally access David procedures. Long-term outcome including the durability of the reimplanted aortic valve seems to be comparable, too.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/fullaortic valve-sparing root replacementDavid procedurereimplantation procedureminimally invasive surgerymini access
spellingShingle Malakh Shrestha
Tim Kaufeld
Pamila Shrestha
Andreas Martens
Saad Rustum
Linda Rudolph
Heike Krüger
Morsi Arar
Axel Haverich
Erik Beckmann
Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
aortic valve-sparing root replacement
David procedure
reimplantation procedure
minimally invasive surgery
mini access
title Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
title_full Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
title_fullStr Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
title_full_unstemmed Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
title_short Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
title_sort valve sparing david procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
topic aortic valve-sparing root replacement
David procedure
reimplantation procedure
minimally invasive surgery
mini access
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/full
work_keys_str_mv AT malakhshrestha valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT timkaufeld valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT pamilashrestha valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT andreasmartens valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT saadrustum valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT lindarudolph valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT heikekruger valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT morsiarar valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT axelhaverich valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome
AT erikbeckmann valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome