Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome
ObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/full |
_version_ | 1811241552617406464 |
---|---|
author | Malakh Shrestha Tim Kaufeld Pamila Shrestha Andreas Martens Saad Rustum Linda Rudolph Heike Krüger Morsi Arar Axel Haverich Erik Beckmann |
author_facet | Malakh Shrestha Tim Kaufeld Pamila Shrestha Andreas Martens Saad Rustum Linda Rudolph Heike Krüger Morsi Arar Axel Haverich Erik Beckmann |
author_sort | Malakh Shrestha |
collection | DOAJ |
description | ObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019, a total of 732 patients underwent a valve sparing root replacement (David) procedure. Out of these, 220 patients underwent elective David-I procedure (isolated) without any other concomitant procedures at our center. Patients were assigned to either group A (n = 42, mini-access) or group B (n = 178, full sternotomy).ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time were 188.5 ± 35.4 min in group A and 149.0 (135.5–167.5) in group B (p < 0.001). Aortic cross-clamp time were 126.2 ± 27.2 min in group A and 110.0 (97.0–126.0) in group B (p < 0.001). Post-operative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≤ I° in 41 (100%) patients of group A and 155 (95%) of group B. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1) in group A and 0% (n = 0) in group B (p = 0.191). Perioperative stroke occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient of group A and 2 (1.1%) patients of group B (p = 0.483). Reexploration for bleeding was necessary in 4 (9.5%) patients of group A and 7 (3.9%) of group B (p = 0.232). Follow-up was complete for 98% of all patients. The 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-year survival rates were: 97, 97, 97, and 97%, in group A (mini-access) and 99, 96, 95, and 92% in group B (full sternotomy), respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related re-operation at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after initial surgery were: 97, 95, 95, and 84% in group A and 97, 95, 91, and 90% in group B, respectively.ConclusionEarly post-operative results after David procedure via minimally invasive access are comparable to conventional full sternotomy. Meticulous attention to hemostasis is a critical factor during minimally access David procedures. Long-term outcome including the durability of the reimplanted aortic valve seems to be comparable, too. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-12T13:37:50Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d17f1289aaad440bad1621d2a139eeaa |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2297-055X |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-12T13:37:50Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-d17f1289aaad440bad1621d2a139eeaa2022-12-22T03:30:57ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2022-10-01910.3389/fcvm.2022.966126966126Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcomeMalakh ShresthaTim KaufeldPamila ShresthaAndreas MartensSaad RustumLinda RudolphHeike KrügerMorsi ArarAxel HaverichErik BeckmannObjectivesAortic valve sparing-aortic root replacement (David procedure) has not been routinely performed via minimally invasive access due to its complexity. We compared our results of elective David procedure via minimally invasive access to those via a full sternotomy.MethodsBetween 1993 and 2019, a total of 732 patients underwent a valve sparing root replacement (David) procedure. Out of these, 220 patients underwent elective David-I procedure (isolated) without any other concomitant procedures at our center. Patients were assigned to either group A (n = 42, mini-access) or group B (n = 178, full sternotomy).ResultsCardiopulmonary bypass time were 188.5 ± 35.4 min in group A and 149.0 (135.5–167.5) in group B (p < 0.001). Aortic cross-clamp time were 126.2 ± 27.2 min in group A and 110.0 (97.0–126.0) in group B (p < 0.001). Post-operative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≤ I° in 41 (100%) patients of group A and 155 (95%) of group B. In-hospital mortality was 2.4% (n = 1) in group A and 0% (n = 0) in group B (p = 0.191). Perioperative stroke occurred in 1 (2.4%) patient of group A and 2 (1.1%) patients of group B (p = 0.483). Reexploration for bleeding was necessary in 4 (9.5%) patients of group A and 7 (3.9%) of group B (p = 0.232). Follow-up was complete for 98% of all patients. The 1-, 2-, 4-, and 6-year survival rates were: 97, 97, 97, and 97%, in group A (mini-access) and 99, 96, 95, and 92% in group B (full sternotomy), respectively. The rates for freedom from valve-related re-operation at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after initial surgery were: 97, 95, 95, and 84% in group A and 97, 95, 91, and 90% in group B, respectively.ConclusionEarly post-operative results after David procedure via minimally invasive access are comparable to conventional full sternotomy. Meticulous attention to hemostasis is a critical factor during minimally access David procedures. Long-term outcome including the durability of the reimplanted aortic valve seems to be comparable, too.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/fullaortic valve-sparing root replacementDavid procedurereimplantation procedureminimally invasive surgerymini access |
spellingShingle | Malakh Shrestha Tim Kaufeld Pamila Shrestha Andreas Martens Saad Rustum Linda Rudolph Heike Krüger Morsi Arar Axel Haverich Erik Beckmann Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine aortic valve-sparing root replacement David procedure reimplantation procedure minimally invasive surgery mini access |
title | Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
title_full | Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
title_fullStr | Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
title_full_unstemmed | Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
title_short | Valve-sparing David procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
title_sort | valve sparing david procedure via minimally invasive access does not compromise outcome |
topic | aortic valve-sparing root replacement David procedure reimplantation procedure minimally invasive surgery mini access |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2022.966126/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT malakhshrestha valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT timkaufeld valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT pamilashrestha valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT andreasmartens valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT saadrustum valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT lindarudolph valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT heikekruger valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT morsiarar valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT axelhaverich valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome AT erikbeckmann valvesparingdavidprocedureviaminimallyinvasiveaccessdoesnotcompromiseoutcome |