A LiDAR-intensity SLAM and loop closure detection method using an intensity cylindrical-projection shape context descriptor

LiDAR Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) is able to map unknown scene while online estimating the LiDAR’s pose. Traditional LiDAR SLAM frameworks mainly rely on geometric features in the environments, but ignore LiDAR intensity information, leading to low accuracy in scenes with sparse env...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xing Zhang, Hongjuan Zhang, Chuang Qian, Bijun Li, Yongxing Cao
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-08-01
Series:International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569843223002431
Description
Summary:LiDAR Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) is able to map unknown scene while online estimating the LiDAR’s pose. Traditional LiDAR SLAM frameworks mainly rely on geometric features in the environments, but ignore LiDAR intensity information, leading to low accuracy in scenes with sparse environmental features. This paper proposes a novel intensity-based LiDAR-SLAM framework. In the front-end, the geometric and intensity features are extracted to match the two consecutive scans. To keep time efficiency, a self-adaptive feature selection strategy is proposed to select geometric and intensity features and the 6 DOF transformation from the corresponding features are weighted fused for odometry estimation. To improve the effectiveness of loop closure detection (LCD), we propose a novel intensity cylindrical-projection shape context (ICPSC) descriptor and a row-column similarity estimation based on ICPSC. To guarantee the accuracy of LCD, a double-value loop candidate verification strategy is employed. We have conducted comprehensive experimental verification of our LiDAR SLAM framework, including both the public KITTI datasets and data from our platform that involve multiple scenes. The results display that our framework achieves an averaged improvement of about 3 m in scenes with sparse environmental features in terms of on-line localization relative to LeGO-LOAM, while only increases maximum 9 ms in terms of time cost.
ISSN:1569-8432