The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions

Two-stage testing is a form of collaborative assessment that creates an active learning environment during test taking. In two-stage testing, students first complete an exam individually, and then complete a subset of the same questions as part of a learning team with the ultimate exam score being...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Brian Rempel, Elizabeth McGinitie, Maria Dirks
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education 2023-10-01
Series:Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/cjsotl_rcacea/article/view/14252
_version_ 1797385592878661632
author Brian Rempel
Elizabeth McGinitie
Maria Dirks
author_facet Brian Rempel
Elizabeth McGinitie
Maria Dirks
author_sort Brian Rempel
collection DOAJ
description Two-stage testing is a form of collaborative assessment that creates an active learning environment during test taking. In two-stage testing, students first complete an exam individually, and then complete a subset of the same questions as part of a learning team with the ultimate exam score being a weighted average of the individual and team portions. In the second (team-based) part of the exam, students are encouraged to discuss solutions until a consensus among team members is achieved, thus actively engaging students with course material and each other during the exam. A short open-ended survey was administered to students at the end of the semester, and the responses coded by thematic analysis, with themes generated using inductive coding based on the principles of grounded theory. The most important conclusion was that students overwhelmingly preferred two-stage tests for the development of positive peer relationships in class. The most common themes that emerged from student responses involved positive feelings from forced interaction with their peers, the benefits of meeting and socializing with other students, sharing of knowledge with others, and solidarity or positive affect towards the process of working as part of a team. Finally, students also expressed an overall preference for two-stage exams when compared to solely individual, one-stage exams.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T21:56:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d18195d0880d4160be1b5b8756465197
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1918-2902
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T21:56:24Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Society for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education
record_format Article
series Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
spelling doaj.art-d18195d0880d4160be1b5b87564651972023-12-19T19:15:47ZengSociety for Teaching and Learning in Higher EducationCanadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning1918-29022023-10-0114210.5206/cjsotlrcacea.2023.2.14252The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student PerceptionsBrian Rempel0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1838-5055Elizabeth McGinitie1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6319-9841Maria DirksUniversity of Alberta - Augustana CampusUniversity of Alberta - Augustana Campus Two-stage testing is a form of collaborative assessment that creates an active learning environment during test taking. In two-stage testing, students first complete an exam individually, and then complete a subset of the same questions as part of a learning team with the ultimate exam score being a weighted average of the individual and team portions. In the second (team-based) part of the exam, students are encouraged to discuss solutions until a consensus among team members is achieved, thus actively engaging students with course material and each other during the exam. A short open-ended survey was administered to students at the end of the semester, and the responses coded by thematic analysis, with themes generated using inductive coding based on the principles of grounded theory. The most important conclusion was that students overwhelmingly preferred two-stage tests for the development of positive peer relationships in class. The most common themes that emerged from student responses involved positive feelings from forced interaction with their peers, the benefits of meeting and socializing with other students, sharing of knowledge with others, and solidarity or positive affect towards the process of working as part of a team. Finally, students also expressed an overall preference for two-stage exams when compared to solely individual, one-stage exams. https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/cjsotl_rcacea/article/view/14252collaborative learningtesting and assessmentpeer relationshipsfirst-year undergraduate
spellingShingle Brian Rempel
Elizabeth McGinitie
Maria Dirks
The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning
collaborative learning
testing and assessment
peer relationships
first-year undergraduate
title The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
title_full The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
title_fullStr The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
title_full_unstemmed The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
title_short The Influence of Two-Stage Collaborative Testing on Peer Relationships: A Study of First-Year University Student Perceptions
title_sort influence of two stage collaborative testing on peer relationships a study of first year university student perceptions
topic collaborative learning
testing and assessment
peer relationships
first-year undergraduate
url https://ojs.lib.uwo.ca/index.php/cjsotl_rcacea/article/view/14252
work_keys_str_mv AT brianrempel theinfluenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions
AT elizabethmcginitie theinfluenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions
AT mariadirks theinfluenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions
AT brianrempel influenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions
AT elizabethmcginitie influenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions
AT mariadirks influenceoftwostagecollaborativetestingonpeerrelationshipsastudyoffirstyearuniversitystudentperceptions