Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function

The decision to transfer or share an insurable risk is critical for the decision maker’s economy. This paper deals with this decision, starting with the definition of a function that represents the difference between the expected utility of insuring, with or without deductibles, and the expected uti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Mercè Claramunt, Maite Mármol, Xavier Varea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1070
_version_ 1797614913451982848
author M. Mercè Claramunt
Maite Mármol
Xavier Varea
author_facet M. Mercè Claramunt
Maite Mármol
Xavier Varea
author_sort M. Mercè Claramunt
collection DOAJ
description The decision to transfer or share an insurable risk is critical for the decision maker’s economy. This paper deals with this decision, starting with the definition of a function that represents the difference between the expected utility of insuring, with or without deductibles, and the expected utility of not insuring. Considering a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility function, we provide a decision pattern for the potential policyholders as a function of their wealth level. The obtained rule applies to any premium principle, any per-claim deductible and any risk distribution. Furthermore, numerical results are presented based on the mean principle, a per-claim absolute deductible and a Poisson-exponential model, and a sensitivity analysis regarding the deductible parameter and the insurer security loading was performed. One of the main conclusions of the paper is that the initial level of wealth is the main variable that determines the decision to insure or not to insure; thus, for high levels of wealth, the decision is always not to insure regardless of the risk aversion of the decision maker. Moreover, the parameters defining the deductible and the premium only have an influence at low levels of wealth.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T07:19:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1828897f3e14a0b87a491d500bc1096
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T07:19:01Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-d1828897f3e14a0b87a491d500bc10962023-11-17T08:07:47ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902023-02-01115107010.3390/math11051070Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility FunctionM. Mercè Claramunt0Maite Mármol1Xavier Varea2Department of Mathematics for Economics, Finance and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Avinguda Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Mathematics for Economics, Finance and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Avinguda Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, SpainDepartment of Mathematics for Economics, Finance and Actuarial Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Barcelona, Avinguda Diagonal 690, 08034 Barcelona, SpainThe decision to transfer or share an insurable risk is critical for the decision maker’s economy. This paper deals with this decision, starting with the definition of a function that represents the difference between the expected utility of insuring, with or without deductibles, and the expected utility of not insuring. Considering a constant relative risk aversion (CRRA) utility function, we provide a decision pattern for the potential policyholders as a function of their wealth level. The obtained rule applies to any premium principle, any per-claim deductible and any risk distribution. Furthermore, numerical results are presented based on the mean principle, a per-claim absolute deductible and a Poisson-exponential model, and a sensitivity analysis regarding the deductible parameter and the insurer security loading was performed. One of the main conclusions of the paper is that the initial level of wealth is the main variable that determines the decision to insure or not to insure; thus, for high levels of wealth, the decision is always not to insure regardless of the risk aversion of the decision maker. Moreover, the parameters defining the deductible and the premium only have an influence at low levels of wealth.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1070decision analysisrisk analysisCRRA utility functiondeductible
spellingShingle M. Mercè Claramunt
Maite Mármol
Xavier Varea
Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
Mathematics
decision analysis
risk analysis
CRRA utility function
deductible
title Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
title_full Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
title_fullStr Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
title_full_unstemmed Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
title_short Facing a Risk: To Insure or Not to Insure—An Analysis with the Constant Relative Risk Aversion Utility Function
title_sort facing a risk to insure or not to insure an analysis with the constant relative risk aversion utility function
topic decision analysis
risk analysis
CRRA utility function
deductible
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/11/5/1070
work_keys_str_mv AT mmerceclaramunt facingarisktoinsureornottoinsureananalysiswiththeconstantrelativeriskaversionutilityfunction
AT maitemarmol facingarisktoinsureornottoinsureananalysiswiththeconstantrelativeriskaversionutilityfunction
AT xaviervarea facingarisktoinsureornottoinsureananalysiswiththeconstantrelativeriskaversionutilityfunction