Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension

Abstract Objective The efficacy and safety of 1‐month atomoxetine and midodrine therapies were compared. Three‐month atomoxetine and combination therapies were investigated for additional benefits. Methods This prospective open‐label randomized trial included 50 patients with symptomatic neurogenic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jung‐Ick Byun, Do‐Yong Kim, Jangsup Moon, Hye-Rim Shin, Jun‐Sang Sunwoo, Woo‐Jin Lee, Han‐Sang Lee, Kyung‐Il Park, Soon‐Tae Lee, Keun‐Hwa Jung, Ki‐Young Jung, Manho Kim, Sang Kun Lee, Kon Chu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-01-01
Series:Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50968
_version_ 1831539435505713152
author Jung‐Ick Byun
Do‐Yong Kim
Jangsup Moon
Hye-Rim Shin
Jun‐Sang Sunwoo
Woo‐Jin Lee
Han‐Sang Lee
Kyung‐Il Park
Soon‐Tae Lee
Keun‐Hwa Jung
Ki‐Young Jung
Manho Kim
Sang Kun Lee
Kon Chu
author_facet Jung‐Ick Byun
Do‐Yong Kim
Jangsup Moon
Hye-Rim Shin
Jun‐Sang Sunwoo
Woo‐Jin Lee
Han‐Sang Lee
Kyung‐Il Park
Soon‐Tae Lee
Keun‐Hwa Jung
Ki‐Young Jung
Manho Kim
Sang Kun Lee
Kon Chu
author_sort Jung‐Ick Byun
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective The efficacy and safety of 1‐month atomoxetine and midodrine therapies were compared. Three‐month atomoxetine and combination therapies were investigated for additional benefits. Methods This prospective open‐label randomized trial included 50 patients with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). The patients received either atomoxetine 18 mg daily or midodrine 5 mg twice daily and were evaluated 1 and 3 months later. Those who still met the criteria for nOH at 1 month received both midodrine and atomoxetine for an additional 2 months, and if not, they continued their initial medication. The primary outcome was an improvement in orthostatic blood pressure (BP) drop (maximum BP change from supine to 3 min after standing) at 1 month. The secondary endpoints were symptom scores, percentage of patients with nOH at 1 and 3 months. Results Patients with midodrine or atomoxetine treatment showed comparative improvement in the orthostatic BP drop, and overall only 26.2% of the patients had nOH at 1 month, which was similar between the treatment groups. Only atomoxetine resulted in significant symptomatic improvements at 1 month. For those without nOH at 1 month, there was additional symptomatic improvement at 3 months with their initial medication. For those with nOH at 1 month, the combination treatment resulted in no additional improvement. Mild‐to‐moderate adverse events were reported by 11.6% of the patients. Interpretation One‐month atomoxetine treatment was effective and safe in nOH patients. Atomoxetine improved orthostatic BP changes as much as midodrine and was better in terms of ameliorating nOH symptoms.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T23:41:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d196cf79c2004310a178a1f901bde489
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2328-9503
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T23:41:00Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
spelling doaj.art-d196cf79c2004310a178a1f901bde4892022-12-21T22:11:37ZengWileyAnnals of Clinical and Translational Neurology2328-95032020-01-017111212010.1002/acn3.50968Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotensionJung‐Ick Byun0Do‐Yong Kim1Jangsup Moon2Hye-Rim Shin3Jun‐Sang Sunwoo4Woo‐Jin Lee5Han‐Sang Lee6Kyung‐Il Park7Soon‐Tae Lee8Keun‐Hwa Jung9Ki‐Young Jung10Manho Kim11Sang Kun Lee12Kon Chu13Laboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaDepartment of Neurology Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaLaboratory for Neurotherapeutics Department of Neurology Comprehensive Epilepsy Center Center for Medical Innovations Biomedical Research Institute Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Republic of KoreaAbstract Objective The efficacy and safety of 1‐month atomoxetine and midodrine therapies were compared. Three‐month atomoxetine and combination therapies were investigated for additional benefits. Methods This prospective open‐label randomized trial included 50 patients with symptomatic neurogenic orthostatic hypotension (nOH). The patients received either atomoxetine 18 mg daily or midodrine 5 mg twice daily and were evaluated 1 and 3 months later. Those who still met the criteria for nOH at 1 month received both midodrine and atomoxetine for an additional 2 months, and if not, they continued their initial medication. The primary outcome was an improvement in orthostatic blood pressure (BP) drop (maximum BP change from supine to 3 min after standing) at 1 month. The secondary endpoints were symptom scores, percentage of patients with nOH at 1 and 3 months. Results Patients with midodrine or atomoxetine treatment showed comparative improvement in the orthostatic BP drop, and overall only 26.2% of the patients had nOH at 1 month, which was similar between the treatment groups. Only atomoxetine resulted in significant symptomatic improvements at 1 month. For those without nOH at 1 month, there was additional symptomatic improvement at 3 months with their initial medication. For those with nOH at 1 month, the combination treatment resulted in no additional improvement. Mild‐to‐moderate adverse events were reported by 11.6% of the patients. Interpretation One‐month atomoxetine treatment was effective and safe in nOH patients. Atomoxetine improved orthostatic BP changes as much as midodrine and was better in terms of ameliorating nOH symptoms.https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50968
spellingShingle Jung‐Ick Byun
Do‐Yong Kim
Jangsup Moon
Hye-Rim Shin
Jun‐Sang Sunwoo
Woo‐Jin Lee
Han‐Sang Lee
Kyung‐Il Park
Soon‐Tae Lee
Keun‐Hwa Jung
Ki‐Young Jung
Manho Kim
Sang Kun Lee
Kon Chu
Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
title Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
title_full Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
title_fullStr Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
title_short Efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
title_sort efficacy of atomoxetine versus midodrine for neurogenic orthostatic hypotension
url https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.50968
work_keys_str_mv AT jungickbyun efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT doyongkim efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT jangsupmoon efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT hyerimshin efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT junsangsunwoo efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT woojinlee efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT hansanglee efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT kyungilpark efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT soontaelee efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT keunhwajung efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT kiyoungjung efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT manhokim efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT sangkunlee efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension
AT konchu efficacyofatomoxetineversusmidodrineforneurogenicorthostatichypotension