Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study

Introduction: Technical skills have many areas of application in general practice and are a dimension of medical competence. Several studies have attempted to describe the technical procedures performed in general practice but most had limitations in the data collection process, the scope of the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Victor Pointis, Henri Panjo, Anne-Marie Schott, Laurent Letrilliart
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: James Cook University 2023-05-01
Series:Rural and Remote Health
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/7359/
_version_ 1797821042490605568
author Victor Pointis
Henri Panjo
Anne-Marie Schott
Laurent Letrilliart
author_facet Victor Pointis
Henri Panjo
Anne-Marie Schott
Laurent Letrilliart
author_sort Victor Pointis
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Technical skills have many areas of application in general practice and are a dimension of medical competence. Several studies have attempted to describe the technical procedures performed in general practice but most had limitations in the data collection process, the scope of the procedures addressed, or the healthcare actors involved. No French comparable data have been published. The aim of the present study was therefore to describe the frequency and type of technical procedures in French general practice, and to assess their determinants, in particular rurality. Methods: The present study was ancillary to the ECOGEN (Eléments de la COnsultation en médecine GENérale) study, which was an observational cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study conducted in 128 French general practices. Data were collected on 20 613 patient-GP encounters, including the characteristics of GPs and encounters, as well as the health problems managed during the encounter and their associated processes of care; the latter two variables were coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care classification. The GPs' practice location was first classified as rural area, urban cluster, or urban area; the former two categories were combined for analysis. The various technical procedures were classified according to the framework of the International Classification of Process in Primary Care. The frequency of each technical procedure was compared according to GP practice location. The dependent variable analysed was the performance of at least one technical procedure per each health problem managed. Bivariate analysis was performed for all independent variables followed by multivariate analysis for key variables, using a hierarchical model including three levels: the physician, the encounter, the health problem managed. Results: The data included 2202 technical procedures performed. At least one technical procedure was performed in 9.9% of encounters and for 4.6% of health problems managed. The two most frequent groups of technical procedures performed were injections (44.2% of all procedures) and clinical laboratory procedures (17.0%). The following procedures were more often performed by GPs practicing in a rural area or an urban cluster than those practicing in an urban area: injection of joints, bursae, tendons and tendon sheaths (4.1% v 1.2% of all procedures), manipulation and osteopathy (10.3% v 0.4%), excision/biopsy of superficial lesions (1.7% v 0.5%), and cryotherapy (1.7% v 0.3%). Conversely, the following procedures were more often performed by GPs practicing in urban areas: vaccine injection (46.6% v 32.1%), point-of-care testing for group A streptococci (11.8% v 7.6%), and ECG (7.6% v 4.3%). GPs practicing in a rural area or an urban cluster performed more often technical procedures than those practising in an urban area (odds ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.65), according to the multivariate model. Conclusion: Technical procedures were more frequently performed and more complex when they were performed in French rural and urban cluster areas. More studies are required to assess patients' needs regarding technical procedures.
first_indexed 2024-03-13T09:46:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1acf11cf19a4efd8c198d2621f11075
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1445-6354
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-13T09:46:56Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher James Cook University
record_format Article
series Rural and Remote Health
spelling doaj.art-d1acf11cf19a4efd8c198d2621f110752023-05-25T02:20:32ZengJames Cook UniversityRural and Remote Health1445-63542023-05-012310.22605/RRH7359Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional studyVictor Pointis0Henri Panjo1Anne-Marie Schott2Laurent Letrilliart3Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008 Lyon, FranceParis-Saclay, UVSQ, Inserm, CESP, Villejuif, France; and Institut national d’études démographiques (INED), Aubervilliers, FranceUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, RESHAPE Inserm U1290, F-69008 Lyon, France; and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Sante Publique, Lyon, FranceUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Collège universitaire de médecine générale, F-69008 Lyon, France; and Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, RESHAPE Inserm U1290, F-69008 Lyon, France Introduction: Technical skills have many areas of application in general practice and are a dimension of medical competence. Several studies have attempted to describe the technical procedures performed in general practice but most had limitations in the data collection process, the scope of the procedures addressed, or the healthcare actors involved. No French comparable data have been published. The aim of the present study was therefore to describe the frequency and type of technical procedures in French general practice, and to assess their determinants, in particular rurality. Methods: The present study was ancillary to the ECOGEN (Eléments de la COnsultation en médecine GENérale) study, which was an observational cross-sectional, multicentre, nationwide study conducted in 128 French general practices. Data were collected on 20 613 patient-GP encounters, including the characteristics of GPs and encounters, as well as the health problems managed during the encounter and their associated processes of care; the latter two variables were coded according to the International Classification of Primary Care classification. The GPs' practice location was first classified as rural area, urban cluster, or urban area; the former two categories were combined for analysis. The various technical procedures were classified according to the framework of the International Classification of Process in Primary Care. The frequency of each technical procedure was compared according to GP practice location. The dependent variable analysed was the performance of at least one technical procedure per each health problem managed. Bivariate analysis was performed for all independent variables followed by multivariate analysis for key variables, using a hierarchical model including three levels: the physician, the encounter, the health problem managed. Results: The data included 2202 technical procedures performed. At least one technical procedure was performed in 9.9% of encounters and for 4.6% of health problems managed. The two most frequent groups of technical procedures performed were injections (44.2% of all procedures) and clinical laboratory procedures (17.0%). The following procedures were more often performed by GPs practicing in a rural area or an urban cluster than those practicing in an urban area: injection of joints, bursae, tendons and tendon sheaths (4.1% v 1.2% of all procedures), manipulation and osteopathy (10.3% v 0.4%), excision/biopsy of superficial lesions (1.7% v 0.5%), and cryotherapy (1.7% v 0.3%). Conversely, the following procedures were more often performed by GPs practicing in urban areas: vaccine injection (46.6% v 32.1%), point-of-care testing for group A streptococci (11.8% v 7.6%), and ECG (7.6% v 4.3%). GPs practicing in a rural area or an urban cluster performed more often technical procedures than those practising in an urban area (odds ratio=1.31, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.65), according to the multivariate model. Conclusion: Technical procedures were more frequently performed and more complex when they were performed in French rural and urban cluster areas. More studies are required to assess patients' needs regarding technical procedures. https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/7359/clinical laboratoryFrancegeneral practiceinjectionsruralityskills
spellingShingle Victor Pointis
Henri Panjo
Anne-Marie Schott
Laurent Letrilliart
Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
Rural and Remote Health
clinical laboratory
France
general practice
injections
rurality
skills
title Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
title_full Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
title_short Frequency and determinants of technical procedures in French general practice: a cross-sectional study
title_sort frequency and determinants of technical procedures in french general practice a cross sectional study
topic clinical laboratory
France
general practice
injections
rurality
skills
url https://www.rrh.org.au/journal/article/7359/
work_keys_str_mv AT victorpointis frequencyanddeterminantsoftechnicalproceduresinfrenchgeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy
AT henripanjo frequencyanddeterminantsoftechnicalproceduresinfrenchgeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy
AT annemarieschott frequencyanddeterminantsoftechnicalproceduresinfrenchgeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy
AT laurentletrilliart frequencyanddeterminantsoftechnicalproceduresinfrenchgeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy