An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves

<p>Ocean-induced ice-shelf melt is one of the largest uncertainty factors in the Antarctic contribution to future sea-level rise. Several parameterisations exist, linking oceanic properties in front of the ice shelf to melt at the base of the ice shelf, to force ice-sheet models. Here, we asse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Burgard, N. C. Jourdain, R. Reese, A. Jenkins, P. Mathiot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2022-12-01
Series:The Cryosphere
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4931/2022/tc-16-4931-2022.pdf
_version_ 1811295436375326720
author C. Burgard
N. C. Jourdain
R. Reese
A. Jenkins
P. Mathiot
author_facet C. Burgard
N. C. Jourdain
R. Reese
A. Jenkins
P. Mathiot
author_sort C. Burgard
collection DOAJ
description <p>Ocean-induced ice-shelf melt is one of the largest uncertainty factors in the Antarctic contribution to future sea-level rise. Several parameterisations exist, linking oceanic properties in front of the ice shelf to melt at the base of the ice shelf, to force ice-sheet models. Here, we assess the potential of a range of these existing basal melt parameterisations to emulate basal melt rates simulated by a cavity-resolving ocean model on the circum-Antarctic scale. To do so, we perform two cross-validations, over time and over ice shelves respectively, and re-tune the parameterisations in a perfect-model approach, to compare the melt rates produced by the newly tuned parameterisations to the melt rates simulated by the ocean model. We find that the quadratic dependence of melt to thermal forcing without dependency on the individual ice-shelf slope and the plume parameterisation yield the best compromise, in terms of integrated shelf melt and spatial patterns. The box parameterisation, which separates the sub-shelf circulation into boxes, the PICOP parameterisation, which combines the box and plume parameterisation, and quadratic parameterisations with dependency on the ice slope yield basal melt rates further from the model reference. The linear parameterisation cannot be recommended as the resulting integrated ice-shelf melt is comparably furthest from the reference. When using offshore hydrographic input fields in comparison to properties on the continental shelf, all parameterisations perform worse; however, the box and the slope-dependent quadratic parameterisations yield the comparably best results. In addition to the new tuning, we provide uncertainty estimates for the tuned parameters.</p>
first_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1ba6f8f8f9548cfae5a658eb3e88609
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1994-0416
1994-0424
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T05:32:30Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series The Cryosphere
spelling doaj.art-d1ba6f8f8f9548cfae5a658eb3e886092022-12-22T03:00:23ZengCopernicus PublicationsThe Cryosphere1994-04161994-04242022-12-01164931497510.5194/tc-16-4931-2022An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelvesC. Burgard0N. C. Jourdain1R. Reese2A. Jenkins3P. Mathiot4Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, FranceUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, FranceDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKDepartment of Geography and Environmental Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UKUniv. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, IRD, Grenoble INP, IGE, 38000 Grenoble, France<p>Ocean-induced ice-shelf melt is one of the largest uncertainty factors in the Antarctic contribution to future sea-level rise. Several parameterisations exist, linking oceanic properties in front of the ice shelf to melt at the base of the ice shelf, to force ice-sheet models. Here, we assess the potential of a range of these existing basal melt parameterisations to emulate basal melt rates simulated by a cavity-resolving ocean model on the circum-Antarctic scale. To do so, we perform two cross-validations, over time and over ice shelves respectively, and re-tune the parameterisations in a perfect-model approach, to compare the melt rates produced by the newly tuned parameterisations to the melt rates simulated by the ocean model. We find that the quadratic dependence of melt to thermal forcing without dependency on the individual ice-shelf slope and the plume parameterisation yield the best compromise, in terms of integrated shelf melt and spatial patterns. The box parameterisation, which separates the sub-shelf circulation into boxes, the PICOP parameterisation, which combines the box and plume parameterisation, and quadratic parameterisations with dependency on the ice slope yield basal melt rates further from the model reference. The linear parameterisation cannot be recommended as the resulting integrated ice-shelf melt is comparably furthest from the reference. When using offshore hydrographic input fields in comparison to properties on the continental shelf, all parameterisations perform worse; however, the box and the slope-dependent quadratic parameterisations yield the comparably best results. In addition to the new tuning, we provide uncertainty estimates for the tuned parameters.</p>https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4931/2022/tc-16-4931-2022.pdf
spellingShingle C. Burgard
N. C. Jourdain
R. Reese
A. Jenkins
P. Mathiot
An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
The Cryosphere
title An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
title_full An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
title_fullStr An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
title_full_unstemmed An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
title_short An assessment of basal melt parameterisations for Antarctic ice shelves
title_sort assessment of basal melt parameterisations for antarctic ice shelves
url https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/16/4931/2022/tc-16-4931-2022.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT cburgard anassessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT ncjourdain anassessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT rreese anassessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT ajenkins anassessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT pmathiot anassessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT cburgard assessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT ncjourdain assessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT rreese assessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT ajenkins assessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves
AT pmathiot assessmentofbasalmeltparameterisationsforantarcticiceshelves