Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability

The primary objective of this study is to determine the Coir fibres (CF) utilization in solar stills (SS) to boost the quantity of freshwater production. By placing dry CF fibres in the absorber basin, researchers were able to accelerate the rate at which water evaporated from the SS. Under various...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kumar N. Rajiv, Seenivasan S., Hemalatha P., Prakash Kode Jaya, Pitchandi P., Sathiya R.D., Girimurugan R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2023-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/92/e3sconf_icgest2023_02004.pdf
_version_ 1797345310528241664
author Kumar N. Rajiv
Seenivasan S.
Hemalatha P.
Prakash Kode Jaya
Pitchandi P.
Sathiya R.D.
Girimurugan R.
author_facet Kumar N. Rajiv
Seenivasan S.
Hemalatha P.
Prakash Kode Jaya
Pitchandi P.
Sathiya R.D.
Girimurugan R.
author_sort Kumar N. Rajiv
collection DOAJ
description The primary objective of this study is to determine the Coir fibres (CF) utilization in solar stills (SS) to boost the quantity of freshwater production. By placing dry CF fibres in the absorber basin, researchers were able to accelerate the rate at which water evaporated from the SS. Under various CF densities, the freshwater production of the absorber basin was measured (8, 11, 14, 18, 20, 23, and 26). The outcomes demonstrated that yield was raised by 27.23 percent after 18-fiber SSCF was added to the absorber basin. There were 14.27 percent, 19.40 percent, 24.57 percent, 25.00 percent, 16.28 percent, and 6.23 percent yield improvements for solar stills with 8, 11, 14, 18, 20, 23, and 26 fibres in the absorber basin, respectively, as compared to a CSS. The results demonstrate that compared to CSS, the cost to produce one litre of freshwater with SSCF is reduced by 23.1%. The return of investment for SSCF is much more immediate than it is for CSS. An estimated ₹242 was needed to produce 1 litre of freshwater using CSS, while an estimated ₹199 was needed to produce 1 litre of freshwater using SSCF. The payback time for SS was only 6.23 months, which was significantly less than that of solar panels. CF are preferable to other materials for use in the solar still due to their lower cost and higher energy efficiency.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T11:16:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1bd89bc9ae345678595b5c44675b88e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T11:16:51Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-d1bd89bc9ae345678595b5c44675b88e2024-01-26T10:34:40ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422023-01-014550200410.1051/e3sconf/202345502004e3sconf_icgest2023_02004Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viabilityKumar N. Rajiv0Seenivasan S.1Hemalatha P.2Prakash Kode Jaya3Pitchandi P.4Sathiya R.D.5Girimurugan R.6Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, KGISL Institute of TechnologyAssociate Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Rathinam Technical CampusAssistant Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Nandha College of TechnologyAssistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, VNR Vignana Jyothi Institute of Engineering and TechnologyProfessor, Department of Aeronautical Engineering, PSN College of Engineering and TechnologyProfessor, KLEF (Deemed to be University) KL UniversityAssistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Nandha College of TechnologyThe primary objective of this study is to determine the Coir fibres (CF) utilization in solar stills (SS) to boost the quantity of freshwater production. By placing dry CF fibres in the absorber basin, researchers were able to accelerate the rate at which water evaporated from the SS. Under various CF densities, the freshwater production of the absorber basin was measured (8, 11, 14, 18, 20, 23, and 26). The outcomes demonstrated that yield was raised by 27.23 percent after 18-fiber SSCF was added to the absorber basin. There were 14.27 percent, 19.40 percent, 24.57 percent, 25.00 percent, 16.28 percent, and 6.23 percent yield improvements for solar stills with 8, 11, 14, 18, 20, 23, and 26 fibres in the absorber basin, respectively, as compared to a CSS. The results demonstrate that compared to CSS, the cost to produce one litre of freshwater with SSCF is reduced by 23.1%. The return of investment for SSCF is much more immediate than it is for CSS. An estimated ₹242 was needed to produce 1 litre of freshwater using CSS, while an estimated ₹199 was needed to produce 1 litre of freshwater using SSCF. The payback time for SS was only 6.23 months, which was significantly less than that of solar panels. CF are preferable to other materials for use in the solar still due to their lower cost and higher energy efficiency.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/92/e3sconf_icgest2023_02004.pdfcoir fibersolar stillefficiencyproductioneconomic viability
spellingShingle Kumar N. Rajiv
Seenivasan S.
Hemalatha P.
Prakash Kode Jaya
Pitchandi P.
Sathiya R.D.
Girimurugan R.
Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
E3S Web of Conferences
coir fiber
solar still
efficiency
production
economic viability
title Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
title_full Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
title_fullStr Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
title_short Evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
title_sort evaluating the influence of coir fibres on solar still efficiency and economic viability
topic coir fiber
solar still
efficiency
production
economic viability
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2023/92/e3sconf_icgest2023_02004.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarnrajiv evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT seenivasans evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT hemalathap evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT prakashkodejaya evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT pitchandip evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT sathiyard evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability
AT girimuruganr evaluatingtheinfluenceofcoirfibresonsolarstillefficiencyandeconomicviability