Guidelines for cell viability assays

Abstract Recently, the interest in the application of cell viability assays has been increasing in various fields. Cell viability assays may be broadly classified as (a) dye exclusion assays, (b) colorimetric assays, (c) fluorometric assays, (d) luminometric assays, and (e) flow cytometric assays. D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Senem Kamiloglu, Gulce Sari, Tugba Ozdal, Esra Capanoglu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-09-01
Series:Food Frontiers
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.44
_version_ 1818341694199824384
author Senem Kamiloglu
Gulce Sari
Tugba Ozdal
Esra Capanoglu
author_facet Senem Kamiloglu
Gulce Sari
Tugba Ozdal
Esra Capanoglu
author_sort Senem Kamiloglu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Recently, the interest in the application of cell viability assays has been increasing in various fields. Cell viability assays may be broadly classified as (a) dye exclusion assays, (b) colorimetric assays, (c) fluorometric assays, (d) luminometric assays, and (e) flow cytometric assays. Dye exclusion assays include trypan blue, eosin, congo red, and erythrosine B stain assays, whereas 3‐[4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl]‐2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐5‐(3‐carboxymethoxyphenyl)‐2‐(4‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium (MTS), 2,3‐bis‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitro‐5‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium‐5‐carboxanilide (XTT), 2‐(4‐iodophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐1), 2‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐8), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sulforhodamine B (SRB), neutral red uptake (NRU), and crystal violet stain (CVS) assays are among the colorimetric assays. Similarly, resazurin and 5‐carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester (5‐CFDA‐AM) assays are based on fluorometric measurements, whereas luminometric assays comprise adenosine triphosphate and real‐time viability assays. Major flow cytometric assays include membrane asymmetry, membrane permeability, and mitochondria assays. In this guideline, the mechanisms and the practice of assessment of the most common cell viability assays applied in research labs are discussed in detail. An ideal cell viability assay should be safe, rapid, reliable, efficient, and time‐ and cost‐effective, and should not interfere with the test compound. Overall, it can be concluded that more than one cell viability assay should be applied in order to obtain reliable results.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T16:02:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1c092b90a6b454196860e8a6fe5f3f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2643-8429
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T16:02:52Z
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Food Frontiers
spelling doaj.art-d1c092b90a6b454196860e8a6fe5f3f42022-12-21T23:39:08ZengWileyFood Frontiers2643-84292020-09-011333234910.1002/fft2.44Guidelines for cell viability assaysSenem Kamiloglu0Gulce Sari1Tugba Ozdal2Esra Capanoglu3Mevsim Gida Sanayi ve Soguk Depo Ticaret A.S. (MVSM Foods) Bursa TurkeyDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam the NetherlandsDepartment of Food Engineering Faculty of Engineering Istanbul Okan University Tuzla TurkeyDepartment of Food Engineering Faculty of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering Istanbul Technical University Maslak TurkeyAbstract Recently, the interest in the application of cell viability assays has been increasing in various fields. Cell viability assays may be broadly classified as (a) dye exclusion assays, (b) colorimetric assays, (c) fluorometric assays, (d) luminometric assays, and (e) flow cytometric assays. Dye exclusion assays include trypan blue, eosin, congo red, and erythrosine B stain assays, whereas 3‐[4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl]‐2,5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), 3‐(4,5‐dimethylthiazol‐2‐yl)‐5‐(3‐carboxymethoxyphenyl)‐2‐(4‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium (MTS), 2,3‐bis‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitro‐5‐sulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium‐5‐carboxanilide (XTT), 2‐(4‐iodophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐1), 2‐(2‐methoxy‐4‐nitrophenyl)‐3‐(4‐nitrophenyl)‐5‐(2,4‐disulfophenyl)‐2H‐tetrazolium, monosodium salt (WST‐8), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), sulforhodamine B (SRB), neutral red uptake (NRU), and crystal violet stain (CVS) assays are among the colorimetric assays. Similarly, resazurin and 5‐carboxyfluorescein diacetate acetoxymethyl ester (5‐CFDA‐AM) assays are based on fluorometric measurements, whereas luminometric assays comprise adenosine triphosphate and real‐time viability assays. Major flow cytometric assays include membrane asymmetry, membrane permeability, and mitochondria assays. In this guideline, the mechanisms and the practice of assessment of the most common cell viability assays applied in research labs are discussed in detail. An ideal cell viability assay should be safe, rapid, reliable, efficient, and time‐ and cost‐effective, and should not interfere with the test compound. Overall, it can be concluded that more than one cell viability assay should be applied in order to obtain reliable results.https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.44annexin V stainingATP assayMTT assayresazurin assaytrypan blue stain assay
spellingShingle Senem Kamiloglu
Gulce Sari
Tugba Ozdal
Esra Capanoglu
Guidelines for cell viability assays
Food Frontiers
annexin V staining
ATP assay
MTT assay
resazurin assay
trypan blue stain assay
title Guidelines for cell viability assays
title_full Guidelines for cell viability assays
title_fullStr Guidelines for cell viability assays
title_full_unstemmed Guidelines for cell viability assays
title_short Guidelines for cell viability assays
title_sort guidelines for cell viability assays
topic annexin V staining
ATP assay
MTT assay
resazurin assay
trypan blue stain assay
url https://doi.org/10.1002/fft2.44
work_keys_str_mv AT senemkamiloglu guidelinesforcellviabilityassays
AT gulcesari guidelinesforcellviabilityassays
AT tugbaozdal guidelinesforcellviabilityassays
AT esracapanoglu guidelinesforcellviabilityassays