The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time

Research on escalation of commitment has predominantly been studied in the context of a single decision without consideration for the psychological consequences of escalating. This study sought to examine (a) the extent to which people escalate their commitment to a failing course of action in a seq...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alexander T. Jackson, Satoris S. Howes, Edgar E. Kausel, Michael E. Young, Megan E. Loftis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01136/full
_version_ 1819260212526186496
author Alexander T. Jackson
Satoris S. Howes
Edgar E. Kausel
Michael E. Young
Megan E. Loftis
author_facet Alexander T. Jackson
Satoris S. Howes
Edgar E. Kausel
Michael E. Young
Megan E. Loftis
author_sort Alexander T. Jackson
collection DOAJ
description Research on escalation of commitment has predominantly been studied in the context of a single decision without consideration for the psychological consequences of escalating. This study sought to examine (a) the extent to which people escalate their commitment to a failing course of action in a sequential decision-making task, (b) confidence and anger as psychological consequences of escalation of commitment, and (c) the reciprocal relationship between escalation of commitment and confidence and anger. Participants were 110 undergraduate students who completed a series of investment decisions regarding a failing endeavor. Results revealed that although a high proportion of individuals escalate through all decisions, the extent to which they escalated decreased with each decision as they were less willing to invest money in the project. Furthermore, as participants escalated, confidence in one’s decision decreased and anger increased. Lastly, the analyses revealed that the relationship between escalation and confidence is reciprocal. Escalation was negatively associated with confidence, and confidence predicted escalation in the subsequent decision. These results highlight the importance of considering both the determinants and psychological consequences of escalation of commitment.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T19:22:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1c86f0060514aa9b3d2ee751ae476cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T19:22:19Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-d1c86f0060514aa9b3d2ee751ae476cb2022-12-21T17:34:08ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-07-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.01136356096The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over TimeAlexander T. Jackson0Satoris S. Howes1Edgar E. Kausel2Michael E. Young3Megan E. Loftis4Department of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United StatesDepartment of Management, Oregon State University, Bend, OR, United StatesSchool of Management, Pontifical Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, ChileDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN, United StatesResearch on escalation of commitment has predominantly been studied in the context of a single decision without consideration for the psychological consequences of escalating. This study sought to examine (a) the extent to which people escalate their commitment to a failing course of action in a sequential decision-making task, (b) confidence and anger as psychological consequences of escalation of commitment, and (c) the reciprocal relationship between escalation of commitment and confidence and anger. Participants were 110 undergraduate students who completed a series of investment decisions regarding a failing endeavor. Results revealed that although a high proportion of individuals escalate through all decisions, the extent to which they escalated decreased with each decision as they were less willing to invest money in the project. Furthermore, as participants escalated, confidence in one’s decision decreased and anger increased. Lastly, the analyses revealed that the relationship between escalation and confidence is reciprocal. Escalation was negatively associated with confidence, and confidence predicted escalation in the subsequent decision. These results highlight the importance of considering both the determinants and psychological consequences of escalation of commitment.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01136/fullescalation of commitmentsequential decision makingconfidenceangerjudgments
spellingShingle Alexander T. Jackson
Satoris S. Howes
Edgar E. Kausel
Michael E. Young
Megan E. Loftis
The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
Frontiers in Psychology
escalation of commitment
sequential decision making
confidence
anger
judgments
title The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
title_full The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
title_fullStr The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
title_full_unstemmed The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
title_short The Reciprocal Relationships Between Escalation, Anger, and Confidence in Investment Decisions Over Time
title_sort reciprocal relationships between escalation anger and confidence in investment decisions over time
topic escalation of commitment
sequential decision making
confidence
anger
judgments
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01136/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alexandertjackson thereciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT satorisshowes thereciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT edgarekausel thereciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT michaeleyoung thereciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT meganeloftis thereciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT alexandertjackson reciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT satorisshowes reciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT edgarekausel reciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT michaeleyoung reciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime
AT meganeloftis reciprocalrelationshipsbetweenescalationangerandconfidenceininvestmentdecisionsovertime