Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing

In order to compare the environmental benefits of two emission reduction measures, i.e. using low-sulphur oil and shore power technology, this paper takes the ships arriving at Guangzhou port as an example, based on the ship data of entry and departure visa of Guangzhou port in 2015, and uses statis...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: He Weijian, Chen Rongchang, Li Tao, Hu Bing, Tian Yujun, Meng Weizhong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2020-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Online Access:https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/05/e3sconf_iaecst2020_02010.pdf
_version_ 1818876336755703808
author He Weijian
Chen Rongchang
Li Tao
Hu Bing
Tian Yujun
Meng Weizhong
author_facet He Weijian
Chen Rongchang
Li Tao
Hu Bing
Tian Yujun
Meng Weizhong
author_sort He Weijian
collection DOAJ
description In order to compare the environmental benefits of two emission reduction measures, i.e. using low-sulphur oil and shore power technology, this paper takes the ships arriving at Guangzhou port as an example, based on the ship data of entry and departure visa of Guangzhou port in 2015, and uses statistical analysis to determine the relationship between different ship types of diesel engines, ship berthing time and ship deadweight tonnage, and based on the use of low-sulphur oil and berthing using shore power air pollutants emission On the basis of emission factors and diesel engine load, the environmental benefits of the two emission reduction measures are calculated by the calculation model established by the dynamic method. The results show that:(1) in 2015, when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.5%, PM10, NOx, SOx and CO2 decreased by 231.6t, 165.5t, 2039.3t and 0t respectively, when using low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.1%, PM10, NOX, SOx and CO2 decreased by 244.1t, 517.1t, 2382.7t and 0t respectively. when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used shore power, PM, NOx, SOx and CO2 decreased by 283.8t, 2975.6t, 2407.7t and - 3782.2t respectively. (2) compared with the use of low sulphur oil, the use of shore power by berthing ships has a significant advantage in NOx emission reduction. In terms of particulate matter, SOX and CO2 emission reduction, there is no significant difference between the two measures.
first_indexed 2024-12-19T13:40:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1e53cea311f484d9573f0c79a6f88f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2267-1242
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-19T13:40:47Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher EDP Sciences
record_format Article
series E3S Web of Conferences
spelling doaj.art-d1e53cea311f484d9573f0c79a6f88f72022-12-21T20:19:01ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422020-01-011450201010.1051/e3sconf/202014502010e3sconf_iaecst2020_02010Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship BerthingHe Weijian0Chen RongchangLi Tao1Hu BingTian Yujun2Meng Weizhong3China Waterborne Transport Research InstituteChina Waterborne Transport Research InstituteChina Waterborne Transport Research InstituteChina COSCO Shipping Seafarer Management Co., Ltd.In order to compare the environmental benefits of two emission reduction measures, i.e. using low-sulphur oil and shore power technology, this paper takes the ships arriving at Guangzhou port as an example, based on the ship data of entry and departure visa of Guangzhou port in 2015, and uses statistical analysis to determine the relationship between different ship types of diesel engines, ship berthing time and ship deadweight tonnage, and based on the use of low-sulphur oil and berthing using shore power air pollutants emission On the basis of emission factors and diesel engine load, the environmental benefits of the two emission reduction measures are calculated by the calculation model established by the dynamic method. The results show that:(1) in 2015, when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.5%, PM10, NOx, SOx and CO2 decreased by 231.6t, 165.5t, 2039.3t and 0t respectively, when using low-sulphur oil with sulphur content of 0.1%, PM10, NOX, SOx and CO2 decreased by 244.1t, 517.1t, 2382.7t and 0t respectively. when ships berthing in Guangzhou port used shore power, PM, NOx, SOx and CO2 decreased by 283.8t, 2975.6t, 2407.7t and - 3782.2t respectively. (2) compared with the use of low sulphur oil, the use of shore power by berthing ships has a significant advantage in NOx emission reduction. In terms of particulate matter, SOX and CO2 emission reduction, there is no significant difference between the two measures.https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/05/e3sconf_iaecst2020_02010.pdf
spellingShingle He Weijian
Chen Rongchang
Li Tao
Hu Bing
Tian Yujun
Meng Weizhong
Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
E3S Web of Conferences
title Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
title_full Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
title_fullStr Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
title_short Comparative Study on Environmental Benefits of Using low-Sulphur Oil and Shore Power Technology for Ship Berthing
title_sort comparative study on environmental benefits of using low sulphur oil and shore power technology for ship berthing
url https://www.e3s-conferences.org/articles/e3sconf/pdf/2020/05/e3sconf_iaecst2020_02010.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT heweijian comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing
AT chenrongchang comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing
AT litao comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing
AT hubing comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing
AT tianyujun comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing
AT mengweizhong comparativestudyonenvironmentalbenefitsofusinglowsulphuroilandshorepowertechnologyforshipberthing