Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In most countries, the numbers of work-related cancer identified are much lower than are the estimated total burden of cancer caused by exposure at work. Therefore, there is a great need to use all available practical as well as epid...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
BMC
2011-09-01
|
| Series: | Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology |
| Online Access: | http://www.occup-med.com/content/6/1/24 |
| _version_ | 1798041754378698752 |
|---|---|
| author | Lee Lukas Langård Sverre |
| author_facet | Lee Lukas Langård Sverre |
| author_sort | Lee Lukas |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In most countries, the numbers of work-related cancer identified are much lower than are the estimated total burden of cancer caused by exposure at work. Therefore, there is a great need to use all available practical as well as epidemiological methods for identification as well as to develop new methods of recognizing cases of work-related cancers.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Primarily based on practical experiences from Norway, methods to identify cases of possible work-related cancers in the general population and at workplaces as well as methods to recognize more specific cases after referral to specialized clinics are reviewed in this publication.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Countries applying a number of the available methods to detect work-related cancer reach a reporting rate of 60 such cases per million, while other countries that do not employ such methods hardly identify any cases. As most subjects previously exposed to cancer causing agents and substances at work are gradually recruited out of work, methods should be versatile for identification of cases in the general population, as well as at work.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Even in countries using a number of the available methods for identification, only a limited fraction of the real number of work-related cancer are notified to the labour inspectorate. Clinicians should be familiar with the methods and do the best to identify work-related cancer to serve prevention.</p> |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:26:00Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d1e8f760b66d403885273a8942871080 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1745-6673 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-11T22:26:00Z |
| publishDate | 2011-09-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology |
| spelling | doaj.art-d1e8f760b66d403885273a89428710802022-12-22T03:59:45ZengBMCJournal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology1745-66732011-09-01612410.1186/1745-6673-6-24Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experienceLee LukasLangård Sverre<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>In most countries, the numbers of work-related cancer identified are much lower than are the estimated total burden of cancer caused by exposure at work. Therefore, there is a great need to use all available practical as well as epidemiological methods for identification as well as to develop new methods of recognizing cases of work-related cancers.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Primarily based on practical experiences from Norway, methods to identify cases of possible work-related cancers in the general population and at workplaces as well as methods to recognize more specific cases after referral to specialized clinics are reviewed in this publication.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Countries applying a number of the available methods to detect work-related cancer reach a reporting rate of 60 such cases per million, while other countries that do not employ such methods hardly identify any cases. As most subjects previously exposed to cancer causing agents and substances at work are gradually recruited out of work, methods should be versatile for identification of cases in the general population, as well as at work.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>Even in countries using a number of the available methods for identification, only a limited fraction of the real number of work-related cancer are notified to the labour inspectorate. Clinicians should be familiar with the methods and do the best to identify work-related cancer to serve prevention.</p>http://www.occup-med.com/content/6/1/24 |
| spellingShingle | Lee Lukas Langård Sverre Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology |
| title | Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience |
| title_full | Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience |
| title_fullStr | Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience |
| title_full_unstemmed | Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience |
| title_short | Methods to recognize work-related cancer in workplaces, the general population, and by experts in the clinic, a Norwegian experience |
| title_sort | methods to recognize work related cancer in workplaces the general population and by experts in the clinic a norwegian experience |
| url | http://www.occup-med.com/content/6/1/24 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leelukas methodstorecognizeworkrelatedcancerinworkplacesthegeneralpopulationandbyexpertsintheclinicanorwegianexperience AT langardsverre methodstorecognizeworkrelatedcancerinworkplacesthegeneralpopulationandbyexpertsintheclinicanorwegianexperience |