True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective
Objective: The impact of previous aortic root replacement (True-Redo) versus any previous operation (Any-Redo) on outcomes after reoperative aortic root replacement (redo-ROOT) is largely unknown. In this first multi-institutional study, the clinical impact True-Redo versus Any-Redo in the setting o...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2023-12-01
|
| Series: | JTCVS Open |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002887 |
| _version_ | 1797385046638723072 |
|---|---|
| author | Parth M. Patel, MD Dov Levine, MD Andy Dong, MD Tsuyoshi Yamabe, MD Jane Wei, MPH Jose Binongo, PhD Bradley G. Leshnower, MD Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD Edward P. Chen, MD |
| author_facet | Parth M. Patel, MD Dov Levine, MD Andy Dong, MD Tsuyoshi Yamabe, MD Jane Wei, MPH Jose Binongo, PhD Bradley G. Leshnower, MD Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD Edward P. Chen, MD |
| author_sort | Parth M. Patel, MD |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: The impact of previous aortic root replacement (True-Redo) versus any previous operation (Any-Redo) on outcomes after reoperative aortic root replacement (redo-ROOT) is largely unknown. In this first multi-institutional study, the clinical impact True-Redo versus Any-Redo in the setting of redo-ROOT was reviewed. Methods: From 2004 to 2021, 822 patients underwent redo-ROOT at 2 major academic centers: 638 Any-Redo and 184 True-Redo. Matching based on preoperative demographics and concomitant operations resulted in 174 matched pairs. An independent risk factor analysis was performed to determine risk factors for early and late mortality. Results: Patients in the True-Redo group were younger, at 49.9 ± 15.1 versus 55.3 ± 14.7 years, P < .001. Concomitant operations were largely similar between the 2 groups, P > .05. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time (P < .001) and aortic crossclamp time (P = .03) were longer for True-Redo group. In-hospital mortality was 13% (109) and was without significant difference between groups, P = .41. Ten-year survival was 78% versus 76% for True-Redo versus Any-Redo groups respectively, P = .7. Landmark survival analysis at 4 years' postoperatively on the matched groups found that patients in the True-Redo group had improved survival outcomes (P = .046). Risk factors of in-hospital mortality consisted of older age (P < .0001), lower ejection fraction (P = .02), and male patient (P = .0003). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes following redo-ROOT are excellent. Performance of a True-Redo-ROOT does not result in worse in-hospital morbidity or mortality and has improved survival benefit at midterm follow-up when compared with patients in the Any-Redo group. The decision to perform a redo-ROOT must be taken seriously and must be individualized in a patient-specific manner for optimal outcomes. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:48:28Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-d1ec9b2e8ab146259ced7d94d105a8f1 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2666-2736 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-08T21:48:28Z |
| publishDate | 2023-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | JTCVS Open |
| spelling | doaj.art-d1ec9b2e8ab146259ced7d94d105a8f12023-12-20T07:38:16ZengElsevierJTCVS Open2666-27362023-12-0116167176True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspectiveParth M. Patel, MD0Dov Levine, MD1Andy Dong, MD2Tsuyoshi Yamabe, MD3Jane Wei, MPH4Jose Binongo, PhD5Bradley G. Leshnower, MD6Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD7Edward P. Chen, MD8Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GaDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NYDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GaDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NYDepartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GaDepartment of Biostatistics, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GaDivision of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GaDivision of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NYDivision of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC; Address for reprints: Edward P. Chen, MD, Duke University Medical Center, 2310 Erwin Rd, 8660 HAFS Building, Durham, NC 27710.Objective: The impact of previous aortic root replacement (True-Redo) versus any previous operation (Any-Redo) on outcomes after reoperative aortic root replacement (redo-ROOT) is largely unknown. In this first multi-institutional study, the clinical impact True-Redo versus Any-Redo in the setting of redo-ROOT was reviewed. Methods: From 2004 to 2021, 822 patients underwent redo-ROOT at 2 major academic centers: 638 Any-Redo and 184 True-Redo. Matching based on preoperative demographics and concomitant operations resulted in 174 matched pairs. An independent risk factor analysis was performed to determine risk factors for early and late mortality. Results: Patients in the True-Redo group were younger, at 49.9 ± 15.1 versus 55.3 ± 14.7 years, P < .001. Concomitant operations were largely similar between the 2 groups, P > .05. Median cardiopulmonary bypass time (P < .001) and aortic crossclamp time (P = .03) were longer for True-Redo group. In-hospital mortality was 13% (109) and was without significant difference between groups, P = .41. Ten-year survival was 78% versus 76% for True-Redo versus Any-Redo groups respectively, P = .7. Landmark survival analysis at 4 years' postoperatively on the matched groups found that patients in the True-Redo group had improved survival outcomes (P = .046). Risk factors of in-hospital mortality consisted of older age (P < .0001), lower ejection fraction (P = .02), and male patient (P = .0003). Conclusions: Clinical outcomes following redo-ROOT are excellent. Performance of a True-Redo-ROOT does not result in worse in-hospital morbidity or mortality and has improved survival benefit at midterm follow-up when compared with patients in the Any-Redo group. The decision to perform a redo-ROOT must be taken seriously and must be individualized in a patient-specific manner for optimal outcomes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002887aortic root replacementaortic valveaortic surgeryreoperation |
| spellingShingle | Parth M. Patel, MD Dov Levine, MD Andy Dong, MD Tsuyoshi Yamabe, MD Jane Wei, MPH Jose Binongo, PhD Bradley G. Leshnower, MD Hiroo Takayama, MD, PhD Edward P. Chen, MD True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective JTCVS Open aortic root replacement aortic valve aortic surgery reoperation |
| title | True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective |
| title_full | True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective |
| title_fullStr | True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective |
| title_full_unstemmed | True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective |
| title_short | True redo-aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgeryCentral MessagePerspective |
| title_sort | true redo aortic root replacement versus root replacement after any previous surgerycentral messageperspective |
| topic | aortic root replacement aortic valve aortic surgery reoperation |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666273623002887 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT parthmpatelmd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT dovlevinemd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT andydongmd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT tsuyoshiyamabemd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT janeweimph trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT josebinongophd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT bradleygleshnowermd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT hirootakayamamdphd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective AT edwardpchenmd trueredoaorticrootreplacementversusrootreplacementafteranyprevioussurgerycentralmessageperspective |