No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
What happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2014-10-01
|
Series: | Humanities |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517 |
_version_ | 1818529361302650880 |
---|---|
author | David Marriott |
author_facet | David Marriott |
author_sort | David Marriott |
collection | DOAJ |
description | What happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of an appeal to a “new humanism”…), but in the sense that Fanonism itself, as such, would be a discourse and reading of invention? In this essay I compare Fanon’s reading of invention with that of C.L.R. James’s reading of spontaneity in Notes on Dialectics. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-11T17:05:54Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d1f143b8b1d34da082eba7f76d4af5a2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2076-0787 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-11T17:05:54Z |
publishDate | 2014-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Humanities |
spelling | doaj.art-d1f143b8b1d34da082eba7f76d4af5a22022-12-22T00:57:42ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872014-10-013451754510.3390/h3040517h3040517No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of InventionDavid Marriott0History of Consciousness, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, CA 95064, USAWhat happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of an appeal to a “new humanism”…), but in the sense that Fanonism itself, as such, would be a discourse and reading of invention? In this essay I compare Fanon’s reading of invention with that of C.L.R. James’s reading of spontaneity in Notes on Dialectics.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517Frantz FanonC.L.R. JamesHegelwillinventionLeninsovereignty |
spellingShingle | David Marriott No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention Humanities Frantz Fanon C.L.R. James Hegel will invention Lenin sovereignty |
title | No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention |
title_full | No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention |
title_fullStr | No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention |
title_full_unstemmed | No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention |
title_short | No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention |
title_sort | no lords a leaping fanon c l r james and the politics of invention |
topic | Frantz Fanon C.L.R. James Hegel will invention Lenin sovereignty |
url | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT davidmarriott nolordsaleapingfanonclrjamesandthepoliticsofinvention |