No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention

What happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: David Marriott
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-10-01
Series:Humanities
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517
_version_ 1818529361302650880
author David Marriott
author_facet David Marriott
author_sort David Marriott
collection DOAJ
description What happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of an appeal to a “new humanism”…), but in the sense that Fanonism itself, as such, would be a discourse and reading of invention? In this essay I compare Fanon’s reading of invention with that of C.L.R. James’s reading of spontaneity in Notes on Dialectics.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T17:05:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1f143b8b1d34da082eba7f76d4af5a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-0787
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T17:05:54Z
publishDate 2014-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Humanities
spelling doaj.art-d1f143b8b1d34da082eba7f76d4af5a22022-12-22T00:57:42ZengMDPI AGHumanities2076-07872014-10-013451754510.3390/h3040517h3040517No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of InventionDavid Marriott0History of Consciousness, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St, CA 95064, USAWhat happens to Fanonism when, instead of resistance or liberation, it becomes a discourse of invention? What happens to Fanon’s critique of colonialism and his imagining of a decolonial future, when that critique and imagining are staked not on the refusal of racial humanity itself (in the sense of an appeal to a “new humanism”…), but in the sense that Fanonism itself, as such, would be a discourse and reading of invention? In this essay I compare Fanon’s reading of invention with that of C.L.R. James’s reading of spontaneity in Notes on Dialectics.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517Frantz FanonC.L.R. JamesHegelwillinventionLeninsovereignty
spellingShingle David Marriott
No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
Humanities
Frantz Fanon
C.L.R. James
Hegel
will
invention
Lenin
sovereignty
title No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
title_full No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
title_fullStr No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
title_full_unstemmed No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
title_short No Lords A-Leaping: Fanon, C.L.R. James, and the Politics of Invention
title_sort no lords a leaping fanon c l r james and the politics of invention
topic Frantz Fanon
C.L.R. James
Hegel
will
invention
Lenin
sovereignty
url http://www.mdpi.com/2076-0787/3/4/517
work_keys_str_mv AT davidmarriott nolordsaleapingfanonclrjamesandthepoliticsofinvention