Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students
Introduction: self-regulation is an important construct in motivation through which the students regulate their learning meta-cognition. Self-regulation is one of the most important predictive factors of academic achievement. Therefore evaluating academic self-regulation in learners is critical. The...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fas |
Published: |
Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences
2013-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Medical Education and Development |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-53-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
_version_ | 1818598979228663808 |
---|---|
author | S Borjalilu R Mojtahedzadeh A Mohammadi |
author_facet | S Borjalilu R Mojtahedzadeh A Mohammadi |
author_sort | S Borjalilu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Introduction: self-regulation is an important construct in motivation through which the students regulate their learning meta-cognition. Self-regulation is one of the most important predictive factors of academic achievement. Therefore evaluating academic self-regulation in learners is critical. The aim of this study was to develop validity and to determine the factors structure a self-regulation scale. Methods: We validated the 34-items of Hong and O’Neil self-regulation scale. The scale consisted of four factors: effort, self-checking, self-efficacy, and planning. The score was translated, back translated and checked by several experts. 336 medical students were chosen through multiple steps random sampling and completed the questionnaire. We analyzed the data using SPSS and LISREL software using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods. Results: Principle component analysis revealed that self-regulation scale consists of four factors. The scale accounted for %55 of variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all of the factors confirmed with data. Conclusion: This scale is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing Iranian students’, especially medical students’, self-regulation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:12:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d1f60cafd0eb41acb7e424c7889e1db4 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2251-7065 2251-8266 |
language | fas |
last_indexed | 2024-12-16T12:12:18Z |
publishDate | 2013-09-01 |
publisher | Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Medical Education and Development |
spelling | doaj.art-d1f60cafd0eb41acb7e424c7889e1db42022-12-21T22:32:10ZfasShahid Sadoughi University of Medical SciencesJournal of Medical Education and Development2251-70652251-82662013-09-018200Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical studentsS Borjalilu0R Mojtahedzadeh1A Mohammadi2 Virtual school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Virtual school, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Center for Educational Research in Medical Sciences, Tehran University of Medical Sciences Introduction: self-regulation is an important construct in motivation through which the students regulate their learning meta-cognition. Self-regulation is one of the most important predictive factors of academic achievement. Therefore evaluating academic self-regulation in learners is critical. The aim of this study was to develop validity and to determine the factors structure a self-regulation scale. Methods: We validated the 34-items of Hong and O’Neil self-regulation scale. The scale consisted of four factors: effort, self-checking, self-efficacy, and planning. The score was translated, back translated and checked by several experts. 336 medical students were chosen through multiple steps random sampling and completed the questionnaire. We analyzed the data using SPSS and LISREL software using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis methods. Results: Principle component analysis revealed that self-regulation scale consists of four factors. The scale accounted for %55 of variance. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all of the factors confirmed with data. Conclusion: This scale is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing Iranian students’, especially medical students’, self-regulation.http://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-53-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1Self-regulation reliability validity exploratory factor confirmatory factor analysis |
spellingShingle | S Borjalilu R Mojtahedzadeh A Mohammadi Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students Journal of Medical Education and Development Self-regulation reliability validity exploratory factor confirmatory factor analysis |
title | Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students |
title_full | Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students |
title_fullStr | Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students |
title_full_unstemmed | Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students |
title_short | Exploring the validity, reliability and factor analysis of self-regulation scale for medical students |
title_sort | exploring the validity reliability and factor analysis of self regulation scale for medical students |
topic | Self-regulation reliability validity exploratory factor confirmatory factor analysis |
url | http://jmed.ssu.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-53-1&slc_lang=en&sid=1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sborjalilu exploringthevalidityreliabilityandfactoranalysisofselfregulationscaleformedicalstudents AT rmojtahedzadeh exploringthevalidityreliabilityandfactoranalysisofselfregulationscaleformedicalstudents AT amohammadi exploringthevalidityreliabilityandfactoranalysisofselfregulationscaleformedicalstudents |