How to think about how to think about aesthetic value

Several art scholars have recently doubted the prudence of thinking about the nature of aesthetic value. The problem is that traditional thinking about aesthetic value fails to capture the specificities with which empirical art scholars must grapple. This paper diagnoses how the tradition came to th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Dominic McIver Lopes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2022-12-01
Series:Journal of Aesthetics & Culture
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.2010912
_version_ 1798033668275437568
author Dominic McIver Lopes
author_facet Dominic McIver Lopes
author_sort Dominic McIver Lopes
collection DOAJ
description Several art scholars have recently doubted the prudence of thinking about the nature of aesthetic value. The problem is that traditional thinking about aesthetic value fails to capture the specificities with which empirical art scholars must grapple. This paper diagnoses how the tradition came to think in this problematic way about aesthetic value. It then sketches an approach to aesthetic value that boosts the refractive power of the tools that scholars of the arts can use to bring into focus some of the specificities they care about. The path to that goal skirts the troublesome features of traditional approaches.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:33:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d1f65df78db2414e8ca18fe2fe7ebb72
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2000-4214
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:33:47Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
record_format Article
series Journal of Aesthetics & Culture
spelling doaj.art-d1f65df78db2414e8ca18fe2fe7ebb722022-12-22T04:04:26ZengTaylor & Francis GroupJournal of Aesthetics & Culture2000-42142022-12-0114110.1080/20004214.2021.20109122010912How to think about how to think about aesthetic valueDominic McIver Lopes0University of British ColumbiaSeveral art scholars have recently doubted the prudence of thinking about the nature of aesthetic value. The problem is that traditional thinking about aesthetic value fails to capture the specificities with which empirical art scholars must grapple. This paper diagnoses how the tradition came to think in this problematic way about aesthetic value. It then sketches an approach to aesthetic value that boosts the refractive power of the tools that scholars of the arts can use to bring into focus some of the specificities they care about. The path to that goal skirts the troublesome features of traditional approaches.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.2010912aesthetic valuebeautysocial practicesaction
spellingShingle Dominic McIver Lopes
How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
Journal of Aesthetics & Culture
aesthetic value
beauty
social practices
action
title How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
title_full How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
title_fullStr How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
title_full_unstemmed How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
title_short How to think about how to think about aesthetic value
title_sort how to think about how to think about aesthetic value
topic aesthetic value
beauty
social practices
action
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20004214.2021.2010912
work_keys_str_mv AT dominicmciverlopes howtothinkabouthowtothinkaboutaestheticvalue