Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers
In this essay, I start by entering three methodological concerns about Pinckaers’s work, concerns that will resurface, in different forms, over the course of the paper. I then elaborate some more substantive challenges to Pinckaers’s moral theoretical argument. These are meant not as devastating obj...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Journal of Moral Theology |
Online Access: | https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11430-quaestiones-disputatae-de-pinckaers |
_version_ | 1797654117264392192 |
---|---|
author | Tom Angier |
author_facet | Tom Angier |
author_sort | Tom Angier |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this essay, I start by entering three methodological concerns about Pinckaers’s work, concerns that will resurface, in different forms, over the course of the paper. I then elaborate some more substantive challenges to Pinckaers’s moral theoretical argument. These are meant not as devastating objections, but they do require a convincing response—a response I leave up to moral theologians. Finally, I offer a summary of my critique of Pinckaers’s project. Overall, what I appreciate about that project will take a back seat, not because I fail to appreciate it, but because philosophers thrive on disagreement, and rarely put pen to paper in order to express agreement. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:54:43Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d1f7310f5119437ba35f63958683d5a2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2166-2851 2166-2118 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T16:54:43Z |
publishDate | 2019-05-01 |
publisher | The Journal of Moral Theology, Inc. |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Moral Theology |
spelling | doaj.art-d1f7310f5119437ba35f63958683d5a22023-10-20T17:34:28ZengThe Journal of Moral Theology, Inc.Journal of Moral Theology2166-28512166-21182019-05-018SI2Quaestiones Disputatae de PinckaersTom AngierIn this essay, I start by entering three methodological concerns about Pinckaers’s work, concerns that will resurface, in different forms, over the course of the paper. I then elaborate some more substantive challenges to Pinckaers’s moral theoretical argument. These are meant not as devastating objections, but they do require a convincing response—a response I leave up to moral theologians. Finally, I offer a summary of my critique of Pinckaers’s project. Overall, what I appreciate about that project will take a back seat, not because I fail to appreciate it, but because philosophers thrive on disagreement, and rarely put pen to paper in order to express agreement.https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11430-quaestiones-disputatae-de-pinckaers |
spellingShingle | Tom Angier Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers Journal of Moral Theology |
title | Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers |
title_full | Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers |
title_fullStr | Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers |
title_full_unstemmed | Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers |
title_short | Quaestiones Disputatae de Pinckaers |
title_sort | quaestiones disputatae de pinckaers |
url | https://jmt.scholasticahq.com/article/11430-quaestiones-disputatae-de-pinckaers |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tomangier quaestionesdisputataedepinckaers |