Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

<h4>Background</h4>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), acutely or slowly progressing into irreversible pulmonary disease, causes severe damage to patients' lung functions, as well as death. In China, Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) have been generally combined with Western medic...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shuai-Yang Huang, Hong-Sheng Cui, Ming-Sheng Lyu, Gui-Rui Huang, Dan Hou, Ming-Xia Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272047
_version_ 1811221980848848896
author Shuai-Yang Huang
Hong-Sheng Cui
Ming-Sheng Lyu
Gui-Rui Huang
Dan Hou
Ming-Xia Yu
author_facet Shuai-Yang Huang
Hong-Sheng Cui
Ming-Sheng Lyu
Gui-Rui Huang
Dan Hou
Ming-Xia Yu
author_sort Shuai-Yang Huang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), acutely or slowly progressing into irreversible pulmonary disease, causes severe damage to patients' lung functions, as well as death. In China, Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) have been generally combined with Western medicine (WM) to treat IPF, which are safe and effective. This study aimed to systematically compare the efficacy of 14 CMIs combined with WM in the treatment of IPF based on a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).<h4>Material and methods</h4>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Chinese databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Scientific Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to October 31, 2021. The inclusion criterion was randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CMIs with WM for treating IPF. Reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.4 software and Stata software (version 16.0) were used for the data analysis. NMA were carried out for calculating the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and the probabilities of being the best.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 63 eligible RCTs involving 14 CMIs were included in this NMA. More CMIs can significantly improve the clinical effectiveness rate (CER); Shuxuening injection (SXN)+WM (OR 8.91, 95% CI 3.81-20.83), Shuxuetong injection (SXT)+WM (OR 7.36, 95% CI 3.30-16.00), Shenxiong injection (SX)+WM (OR 5.42, 95% CI 2.90-10.13), Danhong injection (DH)+WM (OR 4.06, 95% CI 2.62-6.29), and Huangqi injection (HQ)+WM (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.55-7.77) were the top five treatment strategies. Furthermore, DH +WM ranked relatively high in the SUCRA value of the nine outcome indicators, oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) (OR -13.39; 95% CI -14.90,-11.89; SUCRA 83.7%), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) (OR -4.77; 95% CI -5.55,-3.99; SUCRA 83.3), orced vital capacity (FVC) (OR -1.42; 95% CI -2.47,-0.36; SUCRA 73.5%), total lung capacity (TLC) (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.51,1.36; SUCRA 89.0%), forced expiratory volume 1/ forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%) (OR -10.30; 95% CI -12.98,-7.62; SUCRA 72.7%), type III collagen (IIIC) (OR 13.08; 95% CI 5.11,21.05; SUCRA 54.9%), and transforming growth factor (TGF) (OR -4.22; 95% CI -6.06,-2.37; SUCRA 85.7%) respectively, which seems to indicate that DH+WM had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This review specified several CMIs combined with WM in the treatment of IPF in China. In contrast to glucocorticoids or antioxidants, CMIs combined with WM delayed the decline in lung function, maintained oxygenation and quality of life in patients with IPF. The combined use of DH, SXN, SX, and safflower yellow sodium chloride injection (HHS) with WM exerted a more positive effect in treating IPF than WM alone. However, there were limitations to the conclusions of this study due to quality control differences in the included trials.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T08:09:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d207f2cfdc3c458c9e7cb06a8d231cd7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T08:09:30Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-d207f2cfdc3c458c9e7cb06a8d231cd72022-12-22T03:41:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-01177e027204710.1371/journal.pone.0272047Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Shuai-Yang HuangHong-Sheng CuiMing-Sheng LyuGui-Rui HuangDan HouMing-Xia Yu<h4>Background</h4>Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), acutely or slowly progressing into irreversible pulmonary disease, causes severe damage to patients' lung functions, as well as death. In China, Chinese medicine injections (CMIs) have been generally combined with Western medicine (WM) to treat IPF, which are safe and effective. This study aimed to systematically compare the efficacy of 14 CMIs combined with WM in the treatment of IPF based on a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA).<h4>Material and methods</h4>PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, and Chinese databases, including the China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, Scientific Journal Database, and China Biology Medicine Database were searched from inception to October 31, 2021. The inclusion criterion was randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on CMIs with WM for treating IPF. Reviewers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan 5.4 software and Stata software (version 16.0) were used for the data analysis. NMA were carried out for calculating the odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), the surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) and the probabilities of being the best.<h4>Results</h4>A total of 63 eligible RCTs involving 14 CMIs were included in this NMA. More CMIs can significantly improve the clinical effectiveness rate (CER); Shuxuening injection (SXN)+WM (OR 8.91, 95% CI 3.81-20.83), Shuxuetong injection (SXT)+WM (OR 7.36, 95% CI 3.30-16.00), Shenxiong injection (SX)+WM (OR 5.42, 95% CI 2.90-10.13), Danhong injection (DH)+WM (OR 4.06, 95% CI 2.62-6.29), and Huangqi injection (HQ)+WM (OR 3.47, 95% CI 1.55-7.77) were the top five treatment strategies. Furthermore, DH +WM ranked relatively high in the SUCRA value of the nine outcome indicators, oxygen partial pressure (PaO2) (OR -13.39; 95% CI -14.90,-11.89; SUCRA 83.7%), carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) (OR -4.77; 95% CI -5.55,-3.99; SUCRA 83.3), orced vital capacity (FVC) (OR -1.42; 95% CI -2.47,-0.36; SUCRA 73.5%), total lung capacity (TLC) (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.51,1.36; SUCRA 89.0%), forced expiratory volume 1/ forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%) (OR -10.30; 95% CI -12.98,-7.62; SUCRA 72.7%), type III collagen (IIIC) (OR 13.08; 95% CI 5.11,21.05; SUCRA 54.9%), and transforming growth factor (TGF) (OR -4.22; 95% CI -6.06,-2.37; SUCRA 85.7%) respectively, which seems to indicate that DH+WM had the highest likelihood of being the best treatment.<h4>Conclusions</h4>This review specified several CMIs combined with WM in the treatment of IPF in China. In contrast to glucocorticoids or antioxidants, CMIs combined with WM delayed the decline in lung function, maintained oxygenation and quality of life in patients with IPF. The combined use of DH, SXN, SX, and safflower yellow sodium chloride injection (HHS) with WM exerted a more positive effect in treating IPF than WM alone. However, there were limitations to the conclusions of this study due to quality control differences in the included trials.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272047
spellingShingle Shuai-Yang Huang
Hong-Sheng Cui
Ming-Sheng Lyu
Gui-Rui Huang
Dan Hou
Ming-Xia Yu
Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
PLoS ONE
title Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_fullStr Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_short Efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
title_sort efficacy of traditional chinese medicine injections for treating idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis a systematic review and network meta analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272047
work_keys_str_mv AT shuaiyanghuang efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT hongshengcui efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingshenglyu efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT guiruihuang efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT danhou efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingxiayu efficacyoftraditionalchinesemedicineinjectionsfortreatingidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysis