Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices

Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pasquale Cirigliano, Andrea Cresti, Andrea Rengo, Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo, Elena Brunori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-10-01
Series:Horticulturae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107
_version_ 1827720852329725952
author Pasquale Cirigliano
Andrea Cresti
Andrea Rengo
Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo
Elena Brunori
author_facet Pasquale Cirigliano
Andrea Cresti
Andrea Rengo
Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo
Elena Brunori
author_sort Pasquale Cirigliano
collection DOAJ
description Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (organo-mineral (OMN) versus chemical (C)) on soil under-vine CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (TSR) in an Italian rainfed vineyard (cv Chardonnay). The TSR was measured using the chamber technique as follows: a close multi-chamber system (prototype) was placed under a vine. Data (CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and moisture) were acquired hourly during two consecutive years (2021 and 2022) from flowering to berry ripening. Physical–hydrological soil parameters were determined, and the seasonal trends of the TSR, soil temperature, and soil moisture were assessed. The TSR measurements fluctuated for the 2021 season, ranging from 1.03 to 1.97 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> for the C treatment, while for the OMN treatment, the TSR measurements ranged from 1.24 to 1.71 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup>. Extreme weather conditions (2022) highlighted the differences between the two agronomical practices, and a decoupling was found between the TSR and the soil water content, with the TSR being controlled primarily by the soil temperature. At the daily scale, the findings showed that the TSR reached its minimum in the early morning hours (5:00–8:00). The results promote organic–mineral nutrition as an improved practice for soil carbon storage (restoration of the organic fraction) by reducing the TSR, permitting the preservation of soil quality and stabilizing the hydrological traits by preserving the biotic activities.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T21:13:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d20ad151d7a94386b5cb7bd46de625ab
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2311-7524
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T21:13:08Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Horticulturae
spelling doaj.art-d20ad151d7a94386b5cb7bd46de625ab2023-11-19T16:39:27ZengMDPI AGHorticulturae2311-75242023-10-01910110710.3390/horticulturae9101107Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization PracticesPasquale Cirigliano0Andrea Cresti1Andrea Rengo2Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo3Elena Brunori4CREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyCREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyDepartment of Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forestry Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyCREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyDepartment of Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forestry Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, ItalySoil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (organo-mineral (OMN) versus chemical (C)) on soil under-vine CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (TSR) in an Italian rainfed vineyard (cv Chardonnay). The TSR was measured using the chamber technique as follows: a close multi-chamber system (prototype) was placed under a vine. Data (CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and moisture) were acquired hourly during two consecutive years (2021 and 2022) from flowering to berry ripening. Physical–hydrological soil parameters were determined, and the seasonal trends of the TSR, soil temperature, and soil moisture were assessed. The TSR measurements fluctuated for the 2021 season, ranging from 1.03 to 1.97 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> for the C treatment, while for the OMN treatment, the TSR measurements ranged from 1.24 to 1.71 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup>. Extreme weather conditions (2022) highlighted the differences between the two agronomical practices, and a decoupling was found between the TSR and the soil water content, with the TSR being controlled primarily by the soil temperature. At the daily scale, the findings showed that the TSR reached its minimum in the early morning hours (5:00–8:00). The results promote organic–mineral nutrition as an improved practice for soil carbon storage (restoration of the organic fraction) by reducing the TSR, permitting the preservation of soil quality and stabilizing the hydrological traits by preserving the biotic activities.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107ecosystem serviceshydrological soil traitsorgano-mineral fertilizationsoil abiotic factors<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L.
spellingShingle Pasquale Cirigliano
Andrea Cresti
Andrea Rengo
Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo
Elena Brunori
Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
Horticulturae
ecosystem services
hydrological soil traits
organo-mineral fertilization
soil abiotic factors
<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L.
title Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
title_full Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
title_fullStr Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
title_short Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
title_sort monitoring of seasonal under vine co sub 2 sub effluxes in a vineyard under different fertilization practices
topic ecosystem services
hydrological soil traits
organo-mineral fertilization
soil abiotic factors
<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L.
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107
work_keys_str_mv AT pasqualecirigliano monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices
AT andreacresti monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices
AT andrearengo monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices
AT mauroeugeniomariadarcangelo monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices
AT elenabrunori monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices