Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices
Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Horticulturae |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107 |
_version_ | 1827720852329725952 |
---|---|
author | Pasquale Cirigliano Andrea Cresti Andrea Rengo Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo Elena Brunori |
author_facet | Pasquale Cirigliano Andrea Cresti Andrea Rengo Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo Elena Brunori |
author_sort | Pasquale Cirigliano |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Soil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (organo-mineral (OMN) versus chemical (C)) on soil under-vine CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (TSR) in an Italian rainfed vineyard (cv Chardonnay). The TSR was measured using the chamber technique as follows: a close multi-chamber system (prototype) was placed under a vine. Data (CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and moisture) were acquired hourly during two consecutive years (2021 and 2022) from flowering to berry ripening. Physical–hydrological soil parameters were determined, and the seasonal trends of the TSR, soil temperature, and soil moisture were assessed. The TSR measurements fluctuated for the 2021 season, ranging from 1.03 to 1.97 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> for the C treatment, while for the OMN treatment, the TSR measurements ranged from 1.24 to 1.71 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup>. Extreme weather conditions (2022) highlighted the differences between the two agronomical practices, and a decoupling was found between the TSR and the soil water content, with the TSR being controlled primarily by the soil temperature. At the daily scale, the findings showed that the TSR reached its minimum in the early morning hours (5:00–8:00). The results promote organic–mineral nutrition as an improved practice for soil carbon storage (restoration of the organic fraction) by reducing the TSR, permitting the preservation of soil quality and stabilizing the hydrological traits by preserving the biotic activities. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-10T21:13:08Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d20ad151d7a94386b5cb7bd46de625ab |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2311-7524 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-10T21:13:08Z |
publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Horticulturae |
spelling | doaj.art-d20ad151d7a94386b5cb7bd46de625ab2023-11-19T16:39:27ZengMDPI AGHorticulturae2311-75242023-10-01910110710.3390/horticulturae9101107Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization PracticesPasquale Cirigliano0Andrea Cresti1Andrea Rengo2Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo3Elena Brunori4CREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyCREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyDepartment of Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forestry Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, ItalyCREA—Council for Agricultural Research and Agricultural Economics Analysis, Research Centre in Viticulture and Oenology, Research Unit for Viticulture (Arezzo), 52100 Arezzo, ItalyDepartment of Innovation in Biological, Agro-Food and Forestry Systems (DIBAF), University of Tuscia, 01100 Viterbo, ItalySoil CO<sub>2</sub> efflux is a pivotal component of agro-ecosystem C budgets. It is considered a proxy indicator of biological activity and a descriptor of soil quality that is strongly linked to agricultural soil management. We investigated the effects of soil fertilization practices (organo-mineral (OMN) versus chemical (C)) on soil under-vine CO<sub>2</sub> efflux (TSR) in an Italian rainfed vineyard (cv Chardonnay). The TSR was measured using the chamber technique as follows: a close multi-chamber system (prototype) was placed under a vine. Data (CO<sub>2</sub>, temperature, and moisture) were acquired hourly during two consecutive years (2021 and 2022) from flowering to berry ripening. Physical–hydrological soil parameters were determined, and the seasonal trends of the TSR, soil temperature, and soil moisture were assessed. The TSR measurements fluctuated for the 2021 season, ranging from 1.03 to 1.97 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup> for the C treatment, while for the OMN treatment, the TSR measurements ranged from 1.24 to 1.71 µmol CO<sub>2</sub>∙m<sup>−2</sup>∙s<sup>−1</sup>. Extreme weather conditions (2022) highlighted the differences between the two agronomical practices, and a decoupling was found between the TSR and the soil water content, with the TSR being controlled primarily by the soil temperature. At the daily scale, the findings showed that the TSR reached its minimum in the early morning hours (5:00–8:00). The results promote organic–mineral nutrition as an improved practice for soil carbon storage (restoration of the organic fraction) by reducing the TSR, permitting the preservation of soil quality and stabilizing the hydrological traits by preserving the biotic activities.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107ecosystem serviceshydrological soil traitsorgano-mineral fertilizationsoil abiotic factors<i>Vitis vinifera</i> L. |
spellingShingle | Pasquale Cirigliano Andrea Cresti Andrea Rengo Mauro Eugenio Maria D’Arcangelo Elena Brunori Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices Horticulturae ecosystem services hydrological soil traits organo-mineral fertilization soil abiotic factors <i>Vitis vinifera</i> L. |
title | Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices |
title_full | Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices |
title_fullStr | Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices |
title_full_unstemmed | Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices |
title_short | Monitoring of Seasonal Under-Vine CO<sub>2</sub> Effluxes in a Vineyard under Different Fertilization Practices |
title_sort | monitoring of seasonal under vine co sub 2 sub effluxes in a vineyard under different fertilization practices |
topic | ecosystem services hydrological soil traits organo-mineral fertilization soil abiotic factors <i>Vitis vinifera</i> L. |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/9/10/1107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pasqualecirigliano monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices AT andreacresti monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices AT andrearengo monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices AT mauroeugeniomariadarcangelo monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices AT elenabrunori monitoringofseasonalundervinecosub2subeffluxesinavineyardunderdifferentfertilizationpractices |