Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions
In the history of decision theory Daniel Ellsberg is known because his seminal paper “Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms” presented the counterexample to Bayesian decision-making that got the normative value of the theory into trouble. An assessment of Ellsberg’s contribution in the more encompas...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Association Œconomia
2016-03-01
|
Series: | Œconomia |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/2276 |
_version_ | 1828751988886601728 |
---|---|
author | Carlo Zappia |
author_facet | Carlo Zappia |
author_sort | Carlo Zappia |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the history of decision theory Daniel Ellsberg is known because his seminal paper “Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms” presented the counterexample to Bayesian decision-making that got the normative value of the theory into trouble. An assessment of Ellsberg’s contribution in the more encompassing framework of his long unnoticed 1962 doctoral thesis suggests that, although he did not take part to the ensuing debate, Ellsberg provided a thorough philosophical and methodological background for his critique of Savage’s axiomatization of decision theory. By concentrating mainly on Ellsberg’s analysis of decision-making in his thesis, this paper examines the way he conceived of the possibility to test normative propositions and tries to identify the kind of normative value he attributed to his own suggested solution for the Ellsberg Paradox. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T21:02:04Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-d2144e8620f34698a6edebb247553395 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2113-5207 2269-8450 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T21:02:04Z |
publishDate | 2016-03-01 |
publisher | Association Œconomia |
record_format | Article |
series | Œconomia |
spelling | doaj.art-d2144e8620f34698a6edebb2475533952022-12-22T01:33:46ZengAssociation ŒconomiaŒconomia2113-52072269-84502016-03-0161577910.4000/oeconomia.2276Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative PropositionsCarlo ZappiaIn the history of decision theory Daniel Ellsberg is known because his seminal paper “Risk, ambiguity and the Savage axioms” presented the counterexample to Bayesian decision-making that got the normative value of the theory into trouble. An assessment of Ellsberg’s contribution in the more encompassing framework of his long unnoticed 1962 doctoral thesis suggests that, although he did not take part to the ensuing debate, Ellsberg provided a thorough philosophical and methodological background for his critique of Savage’s axiomatization of decision theory. By concentrating mainly on Ellsberg’s analysis of decision-making in his thesis, this paper examines the way he conceived of the possibility to test normative propositions and tries to identify the kind of normative value he attributed to his own suggested solution for the Ellsberg Paradox.http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/2276Ellsberg (Daniel)decision theoryambiguityEllsberg Paradox |
spellingShingle | Carlo Zappia Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions Œconomia Ellsberg (Daniel) decision theory ambiguity Ellsberg Paradox |
title | Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions |
title_full | Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions |
title_fullStr | Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions |
title_full_unstemmed | Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions |
title_short | Daniel Ellsberg and the Validation of Normative Propositions |
title_sort | daniel ellsberg and the validation of normative propositions |
topic | Ellsberg (Daniel) decision theory ambiguity Ellsberg Paradox |
url | http://journals.openedition.org/oeconomia/2276 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlozappia danielellsbergandthevalidationofnormativepropositions |