Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge

This paper addresses the problem of modeling credit risk for multi-product and global loan portfolios. The authors presented an improved version of the Basel Committee’s one-factor model for capital requirements calculation. They examined whether latent market factors corresponding to distinct portf...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pawel Siarka
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Series:Mathematics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/562
_version_ 1797413150220353536
author Pawel Siarka
author_facet Pawel Siarka
author_sort Pawel Siarka
collection DOAJ
description This paper addresses the problem of modeling credit risk for multi-product and global loan portfolios. The authors presented an improved version of the Basel Committee’s one-factor model for capital requirements calculation. They examined whether latent market factors corresponding to distinct portfolios are always highly correlated within the global portfolio and how this correlation impacts total losses distribution function. Historical losses of top-tier banks (JPMorgan Chace, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp) were analyzed. Furthermore, the estimation of the correlations between latent market factors was conducted, and its impact on the total loss distribution function was assessed. The research was performed based on consolidated financial statements for holding companies - FR Y-9C reports provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. To verify the improved model, the authors analyzed two distinct loan portfolios for each bank, i.e., credit cards and commercial and industrial loans. They showed that the correlation between latent market factors could be significantly lower than one and disregarding this conclusion may lead to overestimating total unexpected losses. Hence, capital requirements calculated according to the IRB (Internal Ratings Based Approach) formula as a sum of individual VaR999 estimates may be biased. According to this finding, the enhanced one-factor model seems to be more accurate while calculating unexpected total loss for global portfolios. The authors proved that the active credit risk management process aiming to lower market factors’ correlation results in less volatile total losses. Therefore, financial institutions could be more resistant to macroeconomic downturns.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T05:13:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-d2364a448abb4476ae34754cb7773eb4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2227-7390
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T05:13:28Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Mathematics
spelling doaj.art-d2364a448abb4476ae34754cb7773eb42023-12-03T12:47:27ZengMDPI AGMathematics2227-73902021-03-019556210.3390/math9050562Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis ChallengePawel Siarka0Department of Accounting, Reporting and Financial Analysis, Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 53-345 Wroclaw, PolandThis paper addresses the problem of modeling credit risk for multi-product and global loan portfolios. The authors presented an improved version of the Basel Committee’s one-factor model for capital requirements calculation. They examined whether latent market factors corresponding to distinct portfolios are always highly correlated within the global portfolio and how this correlation impacts total losses distribution function. Historical losses of top-tier banks (JPMorgan Chace, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp) were analyzed. Furthermore, the estimation of the correlations between latent market factors was conducted, and its impact on the total loss distribution function was assessed. The research was performed based on consolidated financial statements for holding companies - FR Y-9C reports provided by the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. To verify the improved model, the authors analyzed two distinct loan portfolios for each bank, i.e., credit cards and commercial and industrial loans. They showed that the correlation between latent market factors could be significantly lower than one and disregarding this conclusion may lead to overestimating total unexpected losses. Hence, capital requirements calculated according to the IRB (Internal Ratings Based Approach) formula as a sum of individual VaR999 estimates may be biased. According to this finding, the enhanced one-factor model seems to be more accurate while calculating unexpected total loss for global portfolios. The authors proved that the active credit risk management process aiming to lower market factors’ correlation results in less volatile total losses. Therefore, financial institutions could be more resistant to macroeconomic downturns.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/562credit riskprobability of defaultone-factor modelstress tests
spellingShingle Pawel Siarka
Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
Mathematics
credit risk
probability of default
one-factor model
stress tests
title Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
title_full Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
title_fullStr Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
title_full_unstemmed Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
title_short Global Portfolio Credit Risk Management: The US Banks Post-Crisis Challenge
title_sort global portfolio credit risk management the us banks post crisis challenge
topic credit risk
probability of default
one-factor model
stress tests
url https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/9/5/562
work_keys_str_mv AT pawelsiarka globalportfoliocreditriskmanagementtheusbankspostcrisischallenge